Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T22:20:44.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

HUMAN KNOWLEDGE/HUMAN KNOWERS: COMMENTS ON MICHAEL WILLIAMS' “WHAT'S SO SPECIAL ABOUT HUMAN KNOWLEDGE?”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2015

Abstract

In Michael Williams' “What's So Special About Human knowledge?” he argues that the kind of knowledge characteristic of adult humans is distinctive in that it involves epistemic responsibility. In particular, when an adult human has knowledge, they have a certain kind of epistemic authority, and that to attribute knowledge to them is to grant them a certain kind of authority over the subject matter. I argue that, while it is true that when we attribute knowledge to adult humans, we typically also attribute to them the relevant kind of epistemic authority, this need not be because adult humans have a distinctive kind of knowledge. Rather, it may be because adult humans are distinctive kinds of beings - beings that can have epistemic authority over the subject matter about which they know. The only thing that need be special about human knowledge is that it's had by human knowers.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Kornblith, H. 2002. Knowledge and Its Place in Nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M. 2015. ‘What's So Special about Human Knowledge?Episteme.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagzebski, L. 2003. ‘The Search for the Source of Epistemic Good.Metaphilosophy, 34: 1228.Google Scholar