Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T20:51:22.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

COMMENTS ON “WHAT THE INTERNALIST SHOULD SAY TO THE TORTOISE”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2015

Sarah Wright
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Richard Fumerton has provided two possible responses that the internalist might make to the “Tortoise problem.” I argue that the second of these two responses is preferable, and I suggest one way that it might be strengthened.

Type
Articles
Information
Episteme , Volume 12 , Special Issue 2: 10th Anniversary of Episteme , June 2015 , pp. 219 - 223
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baehr, J. 2011. The Inquiring Mind: On Intellectual Virtues and Virtue Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blackburn, S. 2010. Practical Tortoise Raising: and Other Philosophical Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fumerton, R. 1995. Metaepistemology and Skepticism. Boston, MA: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Fumerton, R. 2015. ‘What the Internalist should say to the Tortoise.’ Episteme, doi:10.1017/epi.2015.12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillies, D. 2003. ‘Probability and Uncertainty in Keynes's General Theory.’ In Runde, J. and Mizuhara, S. (eds), The Philosophy of Keynes’ Economics: Probability, Uncertainty and Convention, pp. 111–29. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lehrer, K. 1997. Self-Trust. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montmarquet, J. 1993. Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Wright, S. 2010. ‘Internalist Virtues and Knowledge.’ Acta Analytica, 25: 119–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. 2013. ‘A Neo-Stoic Approach to Epistemic Agency.’ Philosophical Issues, 23: 262–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagzebski, L. 2012. Epistemic Authority: A Theory of Trust, Authority, and Autonomy in Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar