Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:18:52.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CLOSED-MINDEDNESS AND DOGMATISM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 June 2018

Heather Battaly
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The primary goal of this paper is to propose a working analysis of the disposition of closed-mindedness. I argue that closed-mindedness (CM) is an unwillingness or inability to engage (seriously) with relevant intellectual options. Dogmatism (DG) is one kind of closed-mindedness: it is an unwillingness to engage seriously with relevant alternatives to the beliefs one already holds. I do not assume that the disposition of closed-mindedness is always an intellectual vice; rather I treat the analysis of the disposition, and its status as an intellectual vice, as separate questions. The concluding section develops a framework for determining the conditions under which closed-mindedness will be an intellectual vice.

Type
Articles
Information
Episteme , Volume 15 , Special Issue 3: 2017 Episteme Conference , September 2018 , pp. 261 - 282
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alfano, M. MS. ‘Virtues for Agents in Directed Social Networks.’ Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Audi, R. 2018. ‘Intellectual Virtue, Knowledge, and Justification.’ In Battaly, H. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Virtue Epistemology. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baehr, J. 2010. ‘Epistemic Malevolence.’ In Battaly, H. (ed.), Virtue and Vice, Moral and Epistemic, pp. 189–213. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Baehr, J. 2011. The Inquiring Mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Battaly, H. (ed.) 2010. ‘Epistemic Self-Indulgence.’ In Virtue and Vice, Moral and Epistemic, pp. 215–35. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Battaly, H. 2014. ‘Varieties of Epistemic Vice.’ In Matheson, J. and Vitz, R. (eds), The Ethics of Belief, pp. 51–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Battaly, H. 2016. ‘Epistemic Virtue and Vice: Reliabilism, Responsibilism, and Personalism.’ In Mi, C., Slote, M. and Sosa, E. (eds), Moral and Intellectual Virtues in Western and Chinese Philosophy, pp. 99–120. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Battaly, H. 2017 a. ‘Testimonial Injustice, Epistemic Vice, and Vice Epistemology.’ In Kidd, I. J., Polhaus, G. and Medina, J. (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice, pp. 223–31. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Battaly, H. 2017 b. ‘Intellectual Perseverance.’ Journal of Moral Philosophy. doi: 10.1163/17455243-46810064.Google Scholar
Battaly, H. 2018. ‘Can Closed-mindedness be an Intellectual Virtue?’ Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 85.Google Scholar
Battaly, H. Forthcoming. ‘Closed-mindedness as an Intellectual Vice.’ In Kelp, C. and Greco, J. (eds), Virtue Theoretic Epistemology: New Methods and Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
BonJour, L. 1985. The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Callan, E. and Arena, D. 2009. ‘Indoctrination.’ In Siegel, H. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Education, pp. 104–21. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cassam, Q. Forthcoming. Vices of the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cassam, Q. 2016. ‘Vice Epistemology.’ The Monist, 99: 159–80.Google Scholar
Fricker, M. 2007. Epistemic Injustice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hare, W. 1979. Open-mindedness and Education. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Kidd, I. J. 2018. ‘Epistemic Corruption and Education.’ Episteme. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2018.3.Google Scholar
Lindsay, B. C. 2012. Murder State: California's Native American Genocide, 1846–1873. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. 2004. True to Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. Forthcoming. ‘Epistemic Arrogance and the Value of Political Dissent.’ In Johnson, C. R. (ed.), Voicing Dissent: The Ethics and Epistemology of Making Disagreement Public. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Medina, J. 2013. The Epistemology of Resistance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nguyen, C. T. 2018. ‘Escape the Echo Chamber.’ Aeon. https://aeon.co/essays/why-its-as-hard-to-escape-an-echo-chamber-as-it-is-to-flee-a-cult.Google Scholar
Orwell, G. 1949. 1984. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & Co.Google Scholar
Riggs, W. 2016. ‘Open-mindedness, Insight, and Understanding.’ In Baehr, J. (ed.), Intellectual Virtues and Education, pp. 18–37. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. and Wood, W. J. 2007. Intellectual Virtues. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zagzebski, L. 1996. Virtues of the Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar