Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:07:34.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Instrument development in the Italy-USA Collaborative Spectrum Project

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2011

Paola Rucci  and
Jack D. Maser
Paola Rucci*
Affiliation:
1Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (USA) and Department of Psychiatry, Neurobiology, Biotechnology and Psychopharmacology, University of Pisa, Pisa
Jack D. Maser
Affiliation:
2Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego (USA)
*
Indirizzo per la corrispondenza: Dr. Paola Rucci, Via Sacco 2, 40124 Bologna. Fax: +39-051-421.6814 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Scope – The Collaborative Spectrum Project aims to define subthreshold and atyical conditions not sufficiently characterized in the current diagnostic nomenclature and for which adequate assessment instruments are not available. This paper reports on the development and validation of new instruments to assess the spectrum of five psychiatric disorders. Design – Three multicenter studies and one single-site study were conducted in Italy to assess the validity and reliability of the five spectrum interviews. Another cross-sectional study to validate the panic-agoraphobia spectrum has been conducted in Pittsburgh. Setting – Outpatients attending various university clinics, university students and, in one Italian study, gym attenders were recruited for the studies. Main outcome measures – Five structured clinical interview to assess the spectrum of panicagoraphobia (SCI-PAS), mood (SCI-MOODS), social phobia (SCI-SHY), and the obsessive-compulsive (SCI-OBS) and eating disorder spectra (SCI-ABS) were administered along with a diagnostic interview and a number of self-report and interviewerrated instruments. Results – All the domains of the interview showed high test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.61) and satisfactory internal consistency. Mean domain scores were significantly higher in cases than in controls and in patients with the disorder of interest than in patients with other disorders. Convergent validity was satisfactory for panic-agoraphobia, social phobia and obsessive-compulsive spectrum domains. Differences emerged between SCI-ABS and self-report instruments assessing eating disorders. A cut-off score for the panic-agoraphobia spectrum was defined and its clinical validity was tested. Conclusions – The psychometric properties of the five spectrum interviews are very satisfactory, and studies are currently ongoing to test the clinical validity of all the spectra. Subthreshold and atypical symptoms deserve attention in epidemiological investigation.

Riassunto

Scopo – Il Progetto Collaborativo dello Spettro mira a definire condizioni sottosoglia e atipiche non sufficientemente caratterizzate nel DSM-IV e nell'ICD-10, per le quali non sono disponibili adeguati strumenti di valutazione. Scopo di questo articolo è la descrizione delle procedure di sviluppo e validazione degli strumenti per misurare lo spettro di cinque disturbi psichici. Disegno – Sono stati effettuati 4 studi trasversali, di cui 3 multicentrici condotti in Italia, ed uno condotto esclusivamente a Pisa. Un ulteriore studio trasversale di validazione dello spettro del panico-agorafobia è stato condotto a Pittsburgh. Setting – Pazienti ambulatoriali afferenti alle cliniche universitarie, studenti universitari e, in uno degli studi italiani, anche un campione di frequentatori abttuali delle palestre. Principal misure utilizzate – Cinque interviste strutturate per valutare lo spettro del panico-agorafobia (SCI-PAS), dell'umore (SCI-MOODS), della fobia sociale (SCI-SHY), lo spettro ossessivo-compulsìxvo (SCI-OBS) e quello dei disturbi della condotta alimentare (SCI-ABS), unitamente ad una intervista diagnostica e ad una serie di strumenti auto ed eterovalutativi di contenuto analogo ai domini delle interviste. Risultati – Tutti i domini delle interviste hanno mostrato una elevata stabilità temporale (coefficiente di correlazione intraclasse >0.61) ed una soddisfacente consistenza interna. I punteggi medi dei domini sono risultati significativamente più elevati nei casi rispetto ai controlli e, nella quasi totalità dei confronti, nei pazienti con il disturbo di interesse rispetto ad altri disturbi. I confronti con strumenti analoghi per contenuto hanno messo in luce una buona validità concorrente per i domini dello spettro del panico-agorafobia, della fobia sociale e del disturbo ossessivo-compulsivo. Differenze sono emerse tra i domini dello spettro della condotta alimentare ed altri strumenti autovalutativi, verosimilmente legate anche alla forma di somministrazione. E' stata definita e testata clinicamente una soglia per lo spettro del panico-agorafobia nel campione americano. Conclusioni – Le proprietà psicometriche degli strumenti sono molto soddisfacenti e sono in corso studi di validazione clinica. Le condizioni atipiche e sottosoglia richedono attenzione negli studi clinici ed epidemiologici.

Keywords

instrument developmentsubthreshold disordersspectrum of psychiatric disorderssviluppo di strumentidisturbi sottosogliaspettro dei disturbi psichici.
Type
Invited Papers
Information
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , December 2000 , pp. 249 - 256
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akiskal, H.S. & Pinto, O. (1999). The evolving bipolar spectrum. Prototypes I, II, HI, and IV. Psychiatric Clinics of North America 22(3), 517–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akiskal, H.S., Bourgeois, M. L., Angst, J., Post, R., Möller, H.-J. & Hirschfeld, R. (in press). Re-evaluating the prevalence of and diagnostic composition within the broad clinical spectrum of bipolar disorders. Journal of Affective Disorders.Google Scholar
Angst, J. (1997). Depression and anxiety: implications for nosology, course and treatment. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 58, Suppl. 8, 3–5.Google Scholar
Angst, J., Sellaro, R. & Merikangas, K.R. (2000). Depressive spectrum diagnoses. Comprehensive Psychiatry 41, Suppl. 1, 39–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnold, L.E., Aman, M.G., Martin, A., Collier-Crespin, A., Vitiello, B., Tierney, E., Asarnow, R., Bell-Bradshaw, F., Freeman, B.J., Gates-Ulanet, P., Klin, A., McCraken, J.T., McDougle, C.J., McGough, J.J., Posey, D.J., Seahill, L., Swiezy, N.B., Ritz, L. & Volkmar, F. (2000). Assessment in multisite randomized clinical trials of patients with autistic disorder: the Autism RUPP Network. Research Units on Pediatric Psychopharmacology. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 30(2), 99–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartko, J.J. (1966). The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychological Reports 19, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berney, T.P. (2000). Autism: an evolving concept. British Journal of Psychiatry 176, 20–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cassano, G.B. & Pini, S. (2000). A spectrum model for mood disorders: a useful approach in clinical psychiatry in search of an assessment methodology. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 9, 156–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cassano, G.B. & Savino, M. (1993). Symptomatology of panic disorder: An attempt to define the panic-agoraphobic spectrum phenomenology. In Psychopharmacology of Panic (ed. Montgomery, S.A.), pp. 38–57. Oxford University Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
Cassano, G.B., Michelini, S., Shear, M.K., Coli, E., Maser, J.D. & Frank, E. (1997). The panic-agoraphobic spectrum: A descriptive approach to the assessment and treatment of subtle symptoms. American Journal of Psychiatry 154, Suppl. 6, 27–38.Google Scholar
Cassano, G.B., Band, S., Mauri, M., Dell'Osso, L., Miniati, M., Maser, J.D.Shear, M.K., Frank, E., Grochocinski, V.J. & Rucci, P. (1999). Internal consistency and discriminant validity of the Structured Clinical Interview for Panic Agoraphobic Spectrum (SCI-PAS). International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 9, 138–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coplan, J. (2000). Counseling parents regarding prognosis in autistic spectrum disorder. Pediatrics 105(5), E65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dell'Osso, L., Cassano, G.B., Sarno, N., Millanfranchi, A., Pfanner, C., Gemignani, A., Maser, J.D., Shear, M.K., Grochocinski, V.J., Rucci, P. & Frank, E. (2000). Validity and reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum (SCI-OBS) and of the Structured Clinical Interview for Social Phobia Spectrum (SCI-SHY). International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 9, 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagiolini, A., Dell'Osso, L., Pini, S., Armani, A., Bouanani, S., Rucci, P., Cassano, G.B., Endicott, J., Maser, J.D., Shear, M.K., Grochocinski, V.J. & Frank, E. (1999). Validity and reliability of a new instrument for assessing mood symptomatology: The Structured Clinical Interview for Mood Spectrum (SCI-MOODS). International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 8, 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairburn, C.G. & Beglin, S.J. (1994). Assessment of eating disorders: interview or self-report questionnaire? International Journal of Eating Disorder 16, 363–70.3.0.CO;2-#>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frank, E., Cassano, G.B., Shear, M.K., Rotondo, A., Dell'Osso, L., Mauri, M., Maser, J.D. & Grochocinski, V.J. (1998). The spectrum model: a more coherent approach to the complexity of psychiatric symptomatology. CNS Speclrums 3 (4), 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, E., Shear, M.K., Rucci, P., Cyranowski, J.M., Endicott, J., Fagiolini, A., Grochocinski, V.J., Houck, P., Kupfer, D.J., Maser, J.D. & Cassano, G.B. (2000). Influence of panic-agoraphobic spectrum symptomatology on treatment response in patients with recurrent major depression. American Journal of Psychiatry 157, 1101–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, E., Cyranowski, J.M., Rucci, P.. Shear, M.K., Fagiolini, A., Thase, M.E., Cassano, G.B., Kostelnik, B. & Kupfer, D.J. (submitted for publication). Clinical significance of lifetime panic spectrum sympoms in the treatment of patients with bipolar I disorder.Google Scholar
Hollander, E. & Wong, C.M. (1995). Obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 56, Suppl. 4, 3–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Kendler, K.S., Neale, M.C. & Walsh, D. (1995). Evaluating the spectrum concept of schizophrenia in the Roscommon Family Study. American Journal of Psychiatry 152, 749–754.Google ScholarPubMed
Mauri, M., Borri, C., Baldassari, S., Benvenuti, A., Rucci, P., Cassano, G.B., Shear, M.K., Grochocinski, V.J.. Maser, J.D. & Frank, E. (2000). Acceptability and psychometric properties of the Structured Clinical Interview for Anorexic-Bulimic Spectrum (SCI-ABS). International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 9, 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunnally, J.C. & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric Theory. McGraw Hill: New York.Google Scholar
Pini, S., Maser, J.D., Dell'Osso, L & Cassano, G.B. (1998). Origins of the panic-agoraphobic spectrum and its implications for comorbidity. CNS Spectrums 3(4), 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schotte, K. & Cooper, B. (1999). Subthreshold affective disorders, a useful concept in psychiatric epidemiology? Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 8, 255–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shear, M.K., Frank, E., Rucci, P., Fagiolini, A., Grochocinski, V.J., Houck, P., Cassano, G.B.Kupfer, D.J., Endicott, J., Maser, J.D., Mauri, M. & Banti, S. (submitted for publication). Panic-agoraphobic spectrum: reliability and validity of assessment instruments.Google Scholar
Sheehan, D.V., Lecrubier, Y., Harnett Sheehan, K., Janavs, J., Weiller, E., Bonora, L.I., Keskiner, A., Schinka, J., Knapp, E., Sheehan, M.F. & Dunbar, G.C. (1997). Reliability and validity of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI): According to the SCID-P. European Psychiatry 12, 232–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrout, P.E. (1998). Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 7, 301–317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swets, J. A. (1988). Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240, 1285–1293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed