Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:41:32.855Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Employees with mental health problems: Survey of UK employers' knowledge, attitudes and workplace practices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2011

Elaine Brohan*
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London (United Kingdom)
Claire Henderson
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London (United Kingdom)
Kirsty Little
Affiliation:
Cardiff Institute of Society Health and Ethics, Cardiff University, Cardiff (United Kingdom)
Graham Thornicroft
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London (United Kingdom)
*
Address for correspondence: Ms E. Brohan, Institute of Psychiatry, Box PO29, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF (United kingdom). Fax: +44–020–78481462 E-mail: [email protected]

Summary

Aim – To investigate whether employers who have experience of hiring people with mental health problems differ significantly from those without such experience in terms of knowledge, attitudes and behaviours regarding mental health in the workplace, and the concerns which they report about employing people with mental health problems. We also examine whether non-workplace social contact is associated with the above variables. Methods – A telephone survey was conducted with a randomly selected sample of British employers. The sample included a similar number of human resource managers and managers/executive employees in other roles. Results – 502 employers took part. Having employed someone with a mental health problem was associated with closer non-workplace social contact. Those with experience of employing applicants with mental health problems had significant differences in knowledge (regarding the law), and behaviour (having a policy on hiring applicants with disabilities) but not in attitudes. Conclusions – Non-workplace social contact may be useful to consider in understanding hiring practices. The nature of social contact at work and possible lack of impact of this contact on employer attitudes and concerns warrants further study. Greater support is needed for employers to understand the law regarding mental health problems in the workplace.

Declaration of Interest: The study was part funded by Big Lottery and Comic Relief through their funding of the Time to Change programme. The study was also supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) applied programme grant awarded to the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust. The authors report no conflict of interest in the preparation of this manuscript.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allport, G. W. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA.Google Scholar
Cooper, B. (2009). Strange bedfellows: economics, happiness and mental disorder. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 18, 210213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Couture, S.M. & Penn, D.L. (2003). Interpersonal contact and the stigma of mental illness: A review of the literature. Journal of Mental Health 12, 291305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diksa, E.J. & Rogers, E.S. (1996). Employer concerns about hiring persons with psychiatric disability: results of the Employer Attitude Questionnaire. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin 40, 3144.Google Scholar
Fenton, J.W., O'Hanlon, D. & Allen, D. (2003). Does having been on a ‘section’ reduce your chances of getting a job? Psychiatric Bulletin 27, 177178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hand, C. & Tryssenaar, J. (2006). Small business employers' views on hiring individuals with mental illness. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 29, 166173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hazer, J.T. & Bedell, K.V. (2000). Effects of seeking accommodation and disability on preemployment evaluations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 30, 12011223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolodziej, M.E. & Johnson, B.T. (1996). Interpersonal contact and acceptance of persons with psychiatric disorders: a research synthesis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 64, 13871396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Little, K., Henderson, C., Brohan, E. & Thornicroft, G. (in press). Employers' attitudes to people with mental health problems in the work place in Britain: changes between 2006 and 2009. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale.Google Scholar
Manning, C. & White, P.D. (1995). Attitudes of employers to the mentally ill. Psychiatric Bulletin 19, 541543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mental Health Foundation (2002). Out at Work. A Survey of the Experiences of People with Mental Health Problems within the Workplace. Mental Health Foundation: London.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, T.F. & Tropp, L.R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90, 751783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw, Trust (2006). Mental Health: the Last Workplace Taboo. Shaw Trust: London.Google Scholar
Thornicroft, G., Rose, D., Kassam, A. & Sartorius, N. (2007). Stigma: ignorance, prejudice or discrimination? British Journal of Psychiatry 190, 192193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thornicroft, G., Brohan, E., Rose, D., Sartorius, N., Leese, M. & the INDIGO Study Group (2009). Global pattern of experienced and anticipated discrimination against people with schizophrenia: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet 373, no. 9661, 408415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wahl, O.F. (1999). Mental health consumers' experience of stigma. Schizophrenia Bulletin 25, 467478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warner, R. (2008). Implementing local projects to reduce the stigma of mental illness. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 17, 2025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wheat, K., Brohan, E., Henderson, C. & Thornicroft, G. (2010). How should doctors advise people with mental illness who are seeking work? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 103, 8386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar