Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T19:15:30.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development and psychometric properties of the Reported and Intended Behaviour Scale (RIBS): a stigma-related behaviour measure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

S. Evans-Lacko ,
D. Rose ,
K. Little ,
C. Flach ,
D. Rhydderch ,
C. Henderson  and
G. Thornicroft
S. Evans-Lacko*
Affiliation:
Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK
D. Rose
Affiliation:
Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK
K. Little
Affiliation:
Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK
C. Flach
Affiliation:
Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK
D. Rhydderch
Affiliation:
Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK
C. Henderson
Affiliation:
Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK
G. Thornicroft
Affiliation:
Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK
*
*Address for correspondence: S. Evans-Lacko, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Box P029, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background.

Although stigma in relation to mental health has been defined as including components of knowledge, attitudes and behaviour, no psychometrically tested instrument to assess behavioural discrimination at the population level has been developed. This paper presents details of the development and psychometric properties of the Reported and Intended Behaviour Scale (RIBS), an instrument based on the Star Social Distance Scale, to assess reported (past and current) and intended (future) behavioural discrimination among the general public against people with mental health problems.

Methods.

Three studies were carried out to evaluate psychometric properties of the RIBS (Study 1, n = 92; Study 2, n = 37; Study 3, n = 403). Adults aged 25–45 in socio-economic groups: B, C1 and C2 (middle-income groups) took part in development and testing of the RIBS.

Results.

Internal consistency and test–retest reliability is moderate/substantial. Strong consensus validity was found, as rated by service users/consumers and international experts in stigma research.

Conclusions.

Use of a behavioural outcome may be important to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions intended to reduce stigma and/or discrimination related to mental illness. The RIBS was found to be a brief, feasible and psychometrically robust measure for assessing mental health-related reported and intended behavioural discrimination.

Keywords

Behaviourmental disordersscalessocial changestigmatisation
Type
Original Articles
Information
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , September 2011 , pp. 263 - 271
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angermeyer, M, Matschinger, H (1997). Social distance towards the mentally ill: results of representative surveys in the Federal Republic of Germany. Psychological Medicine 27, 131–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brohan, E, Henderson, C, Little, K, Thornicroft, G (2010). Employees with mental health problems: Survey of UK employers' knowledge, attitudes and workplace practices. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 19, 326–332.Google Scholar
Corrigan, PW, Edwards, AB, Green, A, Diwan, SL, Penn, DL (2001). Prejudice, social distance, and familiarity with mental illness. Schizophrenia Bulletin 27, 219–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crisp, A, Gelder, M, Goddard, E, Meltzer, H (2005). Stigmatization of people with mental illnesses: a follow-up study within the Changing Minds campaign of the Royal College of Psychiatrists. World Psychiatry 4, 106–113.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L (1984). Essentials of Psychological Testing. Harper and Row: New York.Google Scholar
Evans, WD, Price, S, Blahut, S (2005). Evaluating the truth brand. Journal of Health Communication 10, 181–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans-Lacko, S, Little, K, Meltzer, H, Rose, D, Rhydderch, D, Henderson, C, Thornicroft, G (2010 a). Development and Psychometric Properties of the Mental Health Knowledge Schedule (MAKS). Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 55, 440–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans-Lacko, S, London, J, Little, K, Henderson, C, Thornicroft, G (2010 b). Evaluation of a brief anti-stigma campaign in Cambridge: do short-term campaigns work? BMC Public Health 10, 339.Google Scholar
Guy, RJ, Goller, JL, Leslie, DE, Thorpe, RD, Grierson, JW, Batrouney, CG, Kennedy, MI, Lewis, JA, Fairley, C, Ginige, S, Zablotska, IB, Hellard, ME (2009). HIV or STI testing following a social marketing campaign among men who have sex with men. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 63, 391–396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamre, P, Dahl, AA, Malt, UF (1994). Public attitudes to the quality of psychiatric treatment, psychiatric patients, and prevalence of mental disorders. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry 48, 275–281.Google Scholar
Henderson, C, Thornicroft, G (2009). Stigma and discrimination in mental illness: Time to Change. Lancet 373, 1928–1930.Google Scholar
Hocking, B (2003). Reducing mental illness stigma and discrimination - everybody's business. Medical Journal of Australia 178 (Suppl.), S47–S48.Google Scholar
Lin, LI (1989). A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45, 255–268.Google Scholar
Link, BG, Phelan, JC (2009). Conceptualizing Stigma. Annual Review of Sociology 27, 363–385.Google Scholar
Link, BG, Phelan, JC, Bresnahan, M, Stueve, A, Pescosolido, BA (1999). Public conceptions of mental illness: labels, causes, dangerousness, and social distance. American Journal of Public Health 89, 1328–1333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mental Health Commission of Canada (2009). Opening Minds Campaign. (http://www.mentalhealthcommission.ca/English/Pages/OpeningMinds.aspx).Google Scholar
Myers, F, Woodhouse, A, Whitehead, I, McCollam, A, McBryde, L, Pinfold, V (2009). Evaluation of ‘see me’ – the National Scottish Campaign Against the Stigma and Discrimination Associated with Mental Ill-Health. In (Anonymous).Google Scholar
NICE (2007). Behaviour change at population, community and individual levels. In (Anonymous). National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: London.Google Scholar
Phillips, D (1967). Identification of mental illness: its consequences for rejection. Community Mental Health Journal 3, 262–266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richman, WL, Kiesler, S, Weisband, S, Drasgow, F (1999). A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology 85, 754–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, D, Lucas, J (2007). The user and survivor movement in Europe. In Mental Health Policy and Practice Across Europe. The Future Direction of Mental Health Care (ed. Knapp, M, McDaid, D, Mossialos, E and Thornicroft, G). Open University Press: Maidenhead, Berkshire, 336–355.Google Scholar
Rose, D, Thornicroft, G, Pinfold, V, Kassam, A (2007). 250 labels used to stigmatise people with mental illness. BMC. Health Services Research 7, 97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossi, G, Ricci, A, Cicolini, A, Lasalvia, A (2010). Patterns of experienced and anticipated discrimination in patients with schizophremia. Italian results from the INDIGO international multisite project. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 19, 314–325.Google Scholar
Rüsch, N, Corrigan, PW, Wassel, A, Michaels, P, Olschewski, M, Wilkniss, S, Batia, K (2009). Ingroup perception and responses to stigma among persons with mental illness. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 320–328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sartorius, N (1997). Fighting schizophrenia and its stigma. A new World Psychiatric Association educational programme. British Journal of Psychiatry 170, 297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Star, SA (1952). What The Public Thinks About Mental Health And Mental Illness. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association of Mental Health, Indianapolis, Indiana.Google Scholar
Thornicroft, G (2006). Shunned: Discrimination against People with Mental Illness. Oxford University Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
Thornicroft, G, Brohan, E, Rose, D, Sartorius, N, Leese, M (2009). Global pattern of experienced and anticipated discrimination against people with schizophrenia: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet 373, 408–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thornicroft, G, Rose, D, Kassam, A, Sartorius, N (2007). Stigma: ignorance, prejudice or discrimination? British Journal of Psychiatry 190, 192–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Brakel, WH (2006). Measuring health-related stigma – a literature review. Psychological Health Medicine 11, 307–334.Google Scholar
Vaughan, G, Hansen, C (2004). ‘Like minds, Like mine’: a New Zealand project to counter the stigma and discrimination associated with mental illness. Australasian Psychiatry 12, 113–117.Google Scholar
Wahl, OF (1999). Mental health consumers' experience of stigma. Schizophrenia Bulletin 25, 467–478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willis, G (2005). Cognitive Interviewing: A tool for Improving Questionnaire Design. Sage Publications: London, New Delhi.Google Scholar