Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:02:01.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coverage of mental health and substance misuse topics in the Cochrane review system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2012

S. Green-Hennessy
S. Green-Hennessy*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Loyola University Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
*
Address for correspondence: Sharon Green-Hennessy, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Psychology, Department of Psychology, Loyola University Maryland, 4501 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21210, USA. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aims.

To assess the breadth of mental and substance coverage in the Cochrane review system.

Methods.

All mental health and substance entries were identified from the 2005 to April 2012 Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Results.

A total of 1019 entries focused on mental health or substance misuse, with 698 (68.5%) being completed reviews. One out of every five entries focused on serious mental illness/psychosis. Systematic reviews addressing unipolar depression, dementia and certain substance disorders also appeared well-represented. In contrast, a number of impairing disorders frequently seen in practice received less attention, with bipolar disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and autism spectrum disorders each accounting for less than 2% of the entries. The majority of interventions reviewed involved medication (57.1%), although this was not the case for a number of childhood-onset disorders. Some diagnostic areas (sleep, anxiety, mood and substance) were addressed by multiple Cochrane review groups (CRGs).

Conclusions.

The Cochrane Collaboration is well poised to be a strong guiding influence to those seeking to employ evidence-based mental health care. Broadening its diagnostic coverage and diversifying types of intervention reviewed would probably further maximize its impact. A more centralized and directed approach of prioritizing topics could help ensure more comprehensive coverage.

Keywords

Cochrane Collaborationevidence-based health carehealth services researchsystematic reviews
Type
Original Articles
Information
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , June 2013 , pp. 155 - 162
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmad, N, Boutron, I, Deschartres, A, Durieux, P, Ravaud, P (2010). Applicability and generalisability of the results of systematic review to public health practice and policy: a systematic review. Trials 11, 20–28.Google Scholar
Alonso, J, Petukhova, M, Vilagut, G, Chatterji, S, Heeringa, S, Üstün, TB, Alhamzawi, AO, Viana, MC, Angermeyer, M, Bromet, E, Bruffaerts, R, de Girolamo, G, Florescu, S, Gureje, O, Haro, JM, Hinkov, H, Hu, CY, Karam, EG, Kovess, V, Levinson, D, Medina-Mora, ME, Nakamura, Y, Ormel, J, Posada-Villa, J, Sagar, R, Scott, KM, Tsang, A, Williams, DR, Kessler, RC (2011). Days out of role due to common physical and mental conditions: results from the WHO World Mental Health surveys. Molecular Psychiatry 16, 1234–1246.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Revised edn.American Psychiatric Press: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Armstrong, R, Pettman, T, Burford, B, Doyle, J, Waters, E (2012). Cochrane update: tracking and understanding the utility of Cochrane reviews for public health decision making. Journal of Public Health 34, 309–313.Google Scholar
Armstrong, R, Waters, E, Crockett, B, Keleher, H (2007). The nature of evidence resources and knowledge translation for health promotion practitioners. Health Promotion International 22, 254–260.Google Scholar
APA Council of Representatives (2005). Policy statement on evidence-based practice in Psychology. Retrieved 3 July 2012 from http://www.apapracticecentral.org/ce/courses/ebpstatement.pdf.Google Scholar
APA Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice for Children and Adolescents (2008). Disseminating evidence-based practice for children and adolescents: a systems approach to enhancing care. Retrieved 3 July 2012 from http://www.apa.org/practice/resources/evidence/children-report.pdf.Google Scholar
Barbui, C, Tansella, M (2011). Cochrane reviews impact on mental health policy and practice. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 20, 211–214.Google Scholar
Bow, S, Klassen, J, Chisholm, A, Tiosvold, L, Thomson, D, Klassen, TP, Moher, D, Hartling, L (2010). A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. BMC Pediatrics 10, 34–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, RJ (2007). Introduction to the special issue on medically unexplained symptoms: background and future directions. Clinical Psychology Review 27, 769–780.Google Scholar
Cochrane Agenda and Priority Setting Methods Group (2012). Background & History. Retrieved 27 June 2012 from http://capsmg.cochrane.org/background-history.Google Scholar
Cochrane Collaboration. (2012). The Cochrane Policy Manual [updated 14 June 2012]. Retrieved 28 June 2012 from http://www.cochrane.org/policy-manual/325111-guidelines-managing-reviews-overlapping-scope.Google Scholar
Cochrane Library (2012). About the Cochrane Library. Retrieved 13 April 2012 from http://www.cochrane.org/cochranereviews/about-cochrane-library.Google Scholar
Cooper, JL, Aratani, Y (2009). That status of states' policies to support evidence-based practices in children's mental health. Psychiatric Services 60, 1672–1675.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Einfeld, SL, Ellis, LA, Emerson, E (2011). Comorbidity of intellectual disability and mental disorder in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability 36, 137–143.Google Scholar
El Dib, RP, Atallah, AN, Andriolo, RB (2007). Mapping the Cochrane evidence for decision making in health care. Journal of Evaluation and Clinical Practice 13, 689–692.Google Scholar
Forbes, D, Creamer, M, Bisson, JI, Cohen, JA, Crow, BE, Foa, EB, Friedman, MJ, Keane, TM, Kudler, HS, Ursano, RJ (2010). A guide to guidelines for the treatment of PTSD and related conditions. Journal of Traumatic Stress 23, 537–552.Google Scholar
Forsner, T, Hansson, J, Brommels, M, Wistedt, AA, Forsell, Y (2010). Implementing clinical guidelines in psychiatry: a qualitative study of perceived facilitators and barriers. BMC Psychiatry 10, 8.Google Scholar
French, SD, McDonald, S, McKenzie, JE, Green, SE (2005). Investing in updating: how do conclusions change when Cochrane systematic reviews are updated? BMC Medical Research Methodology 5, 33–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaebel, W, Weinmann, S, Sartorius, N, Rutz, W, McIntyre, JS (2005). Schizophrenia practice guidelines: international survey and comparison. British Journal of Psychiatry 187, 248–255.Google Scholar
Gallo, KP, Barlow, DP (2012). Factors involved in clinician adoption and nonadoption of evidence-based interventions in mental health. Clinical Psychology: Research and Practice 19, 93–106.Google Scholar
Gill, PJ, Wang, KY, Mant, D, Hartling, L, Heneghan, C, Perera, R, Klassen, T, Harden, A (2011). The evidence base for interventions delivered to children in primary care: an overview of Cochrane Systematic Reviews. PLos ONE 6, 1–9.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, J (2004). So what has the Cochrane Collaboration ever done for us? A report card on The first 10 years. Canadian Medical Association Journal 171, 747–749.Google Scholar
Handoll, HH, Stott, DJ, Elstub, LJ, Elliott, JC, Kavanagh, AL, Madhok, R (2012). A framework for effective collaboration between specialist and broad-spectrum groups for delivering priority Cochrane reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. Retrieved 28 May 2012 from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089543561200042X.Google Scholar
Hannes, K, Pieters, G, Goedhuys, J, Aertgeerts, B (2010). Exploring barriers to the implementation of evidence-based practice in psychiatry to inform health policy: a focus group study. Community Mental Health Journal 46, 423–432.Google Scholar
Higgins, JPT, Green, S (eds.) (2011). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. Cochrane Collaboration: London.Google Scholar
Isett, KR, Burnam, MA, Coleman-Beattie, B, Hyde, PS, Morrissey, JP, Magnabosco, JL, Rapp, C, Ganju, V, Goldman, HH (2008). The role of state mental health authorities in managing change for the implementation of evidence-based practices. Community Mental Health Journal 44, 195–211.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, AW, Hilden, J, Gøtzsche, PC (2006). Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review. British Medical Journal 333, 782–786.Google Scholar
Kessler, RC, Merikangas, KR, Wang, PS (2010). The epidemiology of mental disorders. In Mental Health Services: A Public Health Perspective, 3rd edn (ed. Levin, BL, Hennessy, KD, Petrila, J), pp. 169–200. Oxford University Press: Oxford, New York.Google Scholar
Littell, JH (2008). Evidence-based or biased? The quality of published reviews of evidence-based practices. Children and Youth Services Review 30, 1299–1317.Google Scholar
Luengo-Fernandez, R, Leal, J, Gray, A (2010). Dementia 2010: economic burden of dementia and associated research funding in the United Kingdom. A Report by the Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford's Alzheimer's Research Trust. Retrieved 15 May 2012 from http://www.dementia2010.org/reports/Dementia2010Full.pdf.Google Scholar
MacLehose, H, Hilton, J, Tovey, D (eds) (2012). The Cochrane Library: Revolution or Evolution? Background paper for The Cochrane Collaboration's Strategic Session, 2012. Retrieved 27 June 2012 from http://www.editorial-unit.cochrane.org/sites/editorial-unit.cochrane.org/files/uploads/2012-CC-strategic-session_full-report.pdf.Google Scholar
Magnabosco, JL (2006). Innovations in mental health services implementation: a report on state-level data from the U.S. Evidence-Based Practices Project. Implementation Science 1, 13–22.Google Scholar
Matthew, SJ, Charney, DS (2009). Publication bias and the efficacy of antidepressant. American Journal of Psychiatry 166, 140–145.Google Scholar
Moher, D, Tsertsvadze, A, Tricco, AC, Eccles, M, Grimshaw, J, Sampson, M, Barrowman, N (2007). A systematic review identified few methods and strategies describing when and how to update systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 60, 1095–1104.Google Scholar
Moseley, AM, Elkins, MR, Herbert, RD, Maher, CG, Sherrington, C (2009). Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 62, 1021–1030.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nasser, M, Welch, V, Tugwell, P, Ueffing, P, Doyle, J, Waters, E (2012). Ensuring relevance for Cochrane reviews: evaluating processes and methods for prioritizing topics for Cochrane reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology Retrieved 28 May 2012 from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435612000029.Google Scholar
Nelson, TD, Steele, RG (2008). Influences on practitioner treatment selection: best research evidence and other considerations. Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research 35, 170–178.Google Scholar
Pagoto, SL, Spring, B, Coups, EJ, Mulvaney, S, Coutu, MF, Ozakinci, G (2007). Barriers and facilitators of evidence-based practice perceived by behavioral science health professionals. Journal of Clinical Psychology 63, 695–705.Google Scholar
Purgato, M, Barbui, C, Adams, CE (2011). Using the needs of the WHO to prioritise Cochrane reviews: the case of antipsychotic drugs. International Journal of Mental Health Systems 5, 25.Google Scholar
Raghavan, R, Bright, CL, Shadoin, AL (2008). Towards a policy ecology of implementation of evidence-based practices in public mental health settings. Implementation Science 3, 26–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, LJ, Noach, MB (2010). Systemic reviews on tobacco control from Cochrane and the Community Guide: different methods, similar findings. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 63, 596–606.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, SE, Glenton, C, Cracknell, J (2008). User experiences of evidence-based online resources for health professionals: user testing of the Cochrane Library. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 8, 34–45.Google Scholar
Slomski, A (2012). US can draw insight from other nations' experiences with evidence-based medicine. Journal of American Medical Association 307, 1567–1569.Google Scholar
Stiles, PG, Boothroyd, RA, Dhont, K, Beiler, PF, Green, AE (2009). Adherence to practice guidelines, clinical outcomes, and costs among Medicaid enrollees with severe mental illness. Evaluation and the Health Professions 32, 69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanenbaum, SJ (2005). Evidence-based practice as mental health policy: three controversies and a caveat. Health Affairs 24, 163–173.Google Scholar
Thase, ME (2008). Do antidepressants really work? A clinicians' guide to evaluating the evidence. Current Psychiatric Reports 10, 487–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tovey, D (2010). The impact of Cochrane reviews [editorial]. Cochrane Library. Retrieved 2 July 2012 from http://www.thecochranelibrary.com/details/editorial/756937/The-Impact-of-Cochrane-Reviews-by-Dr-David-Tovey.html.Google Scholar
Tricco, AC, Tetzlaff, J, Moher, D (2011). The art and science of knowledge synthesis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 64, 11–20.Google Scholar
Vasse, E, Vernooij-Dassen, M, Cantegreil, I, Franco, M, Dorenlots, P, Woods, B, Moniz-Cook, E (2012). Guidelines for psychosocial interventions in dementia care: a European survey and comparison. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 27, 40–48.Google Scholar
Wale, JL, Belizan, M, Nadel, J, Jeffrey, C, Vij, SL (2011). The Cochrane Library review titles that are important to users of health care, a Cochrane Consumer Network project. Health Expectations. Retrieved 3 July 2012 from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00723.x/abstract.Google Scholar
Wittchen, HU, Jacobi, F, Rehm, J, Gustavsson, A, Svensson, M, Jönsson, B, Olesen, J, Allgulander, C, Alonso, J, Faravelli, C, Fratiglioni, L, Jennum, P, Lieb, R, Maercker, A, van Os, J, Preisig, M, Salvador-Carulla, L, Simon, R, Steinhausen, HC (2011). The size and burden of mental disorder and other disorders of the brain in Europe 2010. European Neuropsychopharmacology 21, 655–679.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2008). The Global Burden of Disease: 2004 Update. WHO Press: Geneva.Google Scholar
Yaffe, J, Montgomery, P, Hopewell, S, Sheppard, LD (2012). Empty reviews: a description and consideration of Cochrane systemic reviews with no included studies. Plos ONE 7, e36626.Google Scholar