Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T00:26:12.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recovery, science and human rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2012

M. Amering
M. Amering*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
*
Address for correspondence: Professor M. Amering, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

Evidencehuman rightsrecoveryUN-Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities
Type
Commentaries
Information
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 367 - 369
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amering, M, Schmolke, M (2009). Recovery in Mental Health. Reshaping Scientific and Clinical Responsibilities. Wiley-Blackwell: London.Google Scholar
Amering, M, Mikus, M, Steffen, S (2012). Recovery in Austria: Mental health trialogue. International Review of Psychiatry 24, 11–18.Google Scholar
Anthony, W (2006). Personal accounts: what my MS has taught me about severe mental illnesses. Psychiatric Services 57, 1081–1082.Google Scholar
Leamy, M, Bird, V, Le Boutillier, C, Williams, J, Slade, M (2011). A conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis. British Journal of Psychiatry 199, 445–452.Google Scholar
Roberts, G, Hollins, S (2007). Recovery: our common purpose? Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 13, 397–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, D, Thornicroft, G, Slade, M (2006). Who decides what evidence is? Developing a multiple perspectives paradigm in mental health. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 113 (Suppl. 429), 109–114.Google Scholar
Sibitz, I, Unger, A, Woppmann, A, Zidek, T, Amering, M (2011). Stigma resistance in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 37, 316–323.Google Scholar
Slade, M, Hayward, M (2007). Recovery, psychosis and psychiatry: research is better than rhetoric. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 116, 81–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallcraft, J, Amering, M, Schrank, B (Eds.) (2009). Handbook of Service User Involvement in Mental Health Research. Wiley: London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallcraft, J, Amering, M, Freidin, J, Davar, B, Froggatt, D, Jafri, H, Javed, A, Katontoka, S, Raja, S, Rataemane, S, Steffen, S, Tyano, S, Underhill, C, Wahlberg, H, Warner, R, Herrman, H (2011). Partnerships for better mental health worldwide: WPA recommendations on best practices in working with service users and family carers. World Psychiatry 10, 229–236.Google Scholar
Warner, R (2010). Does the scientific evidence support the recovery model? Editorial. Psychiatrist 34, 3–5.Google Scholar