Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:44:28.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Vibrio alginolyticus infections in the USA, 1988–2012

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2017

K. M. JACOBS SLIFKA*
Affiliation:
Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA Enteric Diseases Epidemiology Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
A. E. NEWTON
Affiliation:
Enteric Diseases Epidemiology Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
B. E. MAHON
Affiliation:
Enteric Diseases Epidemiology Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
*
*Author for correspondence: K. M. Jacobs Slifka, MD, MPH, Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 49 Jesse Hill Jr Drive, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA. (Email: [email protected])
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Vibrio alginolyticus causes soft tissue and bloodstream infection; little systematically collected clinical and epidemiological information is available. In the USA, V. alginolyticus infections are reported to the Cholera and Other Vibrio Illness Surveillance system. Using data from 1988 to 2012, we categorised infections using specimen source and exposure history, analysed case characteristics, and calculated incidence rates using US Census Bureau data. Most (96%) of the 1331 V. alginolyticus infections were from coastal states. Infections of the skin and ear were most frequent (87%); ear infections occurred more commonly in children, lower extremity infections more commonly in older adults. Most (86%) infections involved water activity. Reported incidence of infections increased 12-fold over the study period, although the extent of diagnostic or surveillance bias is unclear. Prevention efforts should target waterborne transmission in coastal areas and provider education to promote more rapid diagnosis and prevent complications.

Type
Original Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

BACKGROUND

Vibrio alginolyticus, a halophilic bacterium found in marine and estuarine environments, causes severe soft tissue infections, sepsis, and other extraintestinal infections. People come into contact with the bacteria through water exposure or through eating contaminated seafood [Reference Newton1Reference Dechet, Koram and Painter6]. V. alginolyticus is one of roughly a dozen Vibrio species that cause human illness and can cause significant morbidity and mortality [Reference Scallan7, Reference Morris and Black39]. Vibrio infections have been reported to the Cholera and Other Vibrio Illness Surveillance (COVIS) system in the USA since 1988. Surveillance started in the Gulf Coast states and has expanded over time, and Vibrio infection became nationally notifiable in 2007. An analysis of both COVIS data and data from the 10-state Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet) from 1996 to 2010 showed a dramatic increase in the incidence of V. alginolyticus infection in both systems [Reference Newton1]. For many years, V. alginolyticus was the third most common Vibrio species reported in human illness, but since 2007, during a period of increasing overall vibriosis rates, it has been the second most common, despite substantial increases in other species [8]. However, little systematically collected clinical and epidemiological information is available regarding V. alginolyticus infection.

Although most vibriosis caused by other species is foodborne, V. alginolyticus is predominantly transmitted by water [Reference Newton1, Reference Dechet, Koram and Painter6], which is reflected by geographic clustering in coastal regions [Reference Dechet, Koram and Painter6] and multiple case reports of otitis externa and traumatic wound infections involving seawater exposure [Reference Gomez9Reference Pien, Lee and Higa19, Reference Hornstrup and Gahrn-Hansen36]. Significant morbidity, including multiple surgeries, prolonged antibiotic treatment, amputations, and other complications [Reference Gomez9Reference Opal and Saxon11, Reference Patterson, Bell and Bia13, Reference Bonner14, Reference Lee20] can occur. Clinical suspicion is important as special media are needed to isolate Vibrio organisms, which may delay diagnosis and appropriate treatment.

We have reviewed surveillance data on V. alginolyticus infections in the USA to describe the epidemiology and clinical presentation, and to provide the basis for recommendations for improving prevention.

METHODS

Surveillance and reporting of culture-confirmed vibriosis in the USA, through COVIS (http://www.cdc.gov/nationalsurveillance/cholera_vibrio_surveillance.html), was established in 1988 in the Gulf Coast states of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, and Texas. Reporting expanded outside of the Gulf Coast in the mid-1990s, and vibriosis became nationally notifiable in 2007 [Reference Newton1]. COVIS collects information on isolates, demographics, pre-existing conditions, clinical features of infection, including presence of a wound, treatments and outcomes, as well as information on travel, seafood, and seawater exposures in the 7 days before illness onset.

For V. alginolyticus infections reported to COVIS from 1988 through 2012, we reviewed state and geographical region, patient demographics (age, sex, race), clinical information, and patient exposure(s) (seawater or sea life contact and seafood consumption) in the 7 days before illness onset. Clinical information included source of the isolate (blood, wound, stool, other), patients’ pre-existing conditions (specifically liver disease, alcohol use, and immunodeficiency), features of the illness, treatment, and outcome.

Infection site was categorised as (1) blood; (2) gastrointestinal (GI); (3) skin, soft tissue, and other non-sterile sites (hereafter called ‘skin-related sites’); and (4) unknown using standard COVIS methods (http://www.cdc.gov/ncezid/dfwed/pdfs/covis-annual-report-2013-508c.pdf; report appendix). The skin-related sites were divided into ear, lower extremity, and other (including head, trunk, upper extremity, and less-common sites) based on the source(s) of the isolate(s). Ear infections were classified as otitis media only if the isolate was specifically described as from a middle or inner ear source (e.g. inner ear fluid, inner ear aspirate); other isolates from the ear were classified as otitis externa. Ear infections were included in the skin-related sites category because very few middle ear infections were reported. We determined the likely transmission route (foodborne, non-foodborne, unknown) from the reported infection site(s) and exposure(s) (single vs. multiple exposures and type(s) of exposure, such as seafood consumption or recreational water activity) using COVIS's standard method, as above, without distinction between confirmed and probable routes of transmission.

We conducted analyses nationally, for each state individually, and also for four US regions: the Gulf Coast, Atlantic, Pacific, and Non-Coastal states.Footnote 1 We calculated descriptive statistics and determined mechanisms of transmission using data from 1988 to 2012. We calculated incidence rates using previously described methods by dividing the annual number of laboratory-confirmed infections by US Census Bureau population estimates for the surveillance area [Reference Newton1]. To account for the expansion of the surveillance system over time, states were included in the surveillance area from the first year they reported a case [Reference Newton1]. We limited incidence rate calculations to 1996–2012, when reporting had expanded beyond the Gulf Coast states, and focused on 2007–2012 for incidence rate and clinical comparisons, when vibriosis was nationally notifiable. Analysis was conducted using SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina).

RESULTS

Epidemiologic observations

A total of 1331 V. alginolyticus infections were reported during 1988–2012. Of these, 1272 (96% of all reported cases with an average of 75 cases/year) were reported from 1996 to 2012, after reporting expanded beyond the Gulf Coast, and 825 (62% of all reported cases with an average of 138 cases/year) from 2007 to 2012, after reporting became nationally notifiable. The incidence rate of reported infections increased 12-fold, from 0·005 infections per 100 000 population in 1996 to 0·064 in 2012 nationally (Figure 1) during the period of expanding surveillance. During 2007–2012, when surveillance was stable, most of the increase in reported incidence occurred in the Gulf Coast region, where reported incidence increased from 0·04 per 100 000 population in 2007 to 0·13 in 2012.

Fig. 1. Annual incidence of Vibrio alginolyticus infections per 100 000 population nationally (1996–2012) and by region (2007–2012), USA.

The Gulf Coast reported 528 (40%) infections, the Atlantic 393 (30%), and the Pacific 351 (26%). The number varied substantially by state within the Gulf Coast and Pacific regions, whereas much less variability was observed within the Atlantic region (Supplementary Table S1). Non-Coastal states reported 59 cases (4%), mostly (33, 56%) in patients who reported out-of-state travel; the destination was the Atlantic or Gulf Coast regions for all 23 patients with information reported. Infections peaked during the summers, with the largest number of cases reported during July. The median age of patients was 33 years (0–92 years). Most (913, 70%) were male (Table 1), with at least 60% males in all groups. Information on race was reported for 1140 (86%) patients; the most commonly reported races were white (842/1140, 74%) and black or African American (61/1140, 5%). Information on ethnicity was reported for 592 (44%) patients; because the data were so incomplete, we did not conduct further analysis.

Table 1. Characteristics of Vibrio alginolyticus infections, USA, 1988–2012

* Infections of the ear were predominantly otitis externa (422/437 (97%)).

Clinical observations

Most (1162; 87%) infections were in skin-related sites, with an increasing percentage over time. Focusing on 1996–2012, when numbers were large enough for proportions to be relatively stable, the percentage of infections that were in skin-related sites increased from <80% in the mid-1990s to >90% in the 2000s. Infections of skin-related sites were responsible for most of the increase in incidence, increasing 10-fold from 0·0048 infections per 100 000 population in 1996 to 0·047 in 2012. The lower extremity (455, 34% of all infections) and ear (437, 33% of all infections) were the most common skin-related infection sites. Both blood and GI infections were rare and increased minimally, each with 0·0017 infections per 100 000 population reported in 2012. Ear infections were usually described as draining otitis externa (422/437 ear infections with information, 97%); otitis media was uncommon (15, 3%). The next most common other skin-related sites, reported in 270 patients, were upper extremity, head, and trunk. GI infections occurred in 5% (62), blood infections in 4% (56), and the site was not reported in 4% (51). In younger age groups, especially children <10 years of age, most skin-related infections were of the ear, whereas in older age groups, especially those ⩾50 years of age, most were of the lower extremity (Figure 2). During 2007–2012, lower extremity infections were more common in the Gulf Coast (207/433, 48%) than in the Pacific (125, 29%) and Atlantic Coasts (101, 23%).

Fig. 2. Percentage of Vibrio alginolyticus infections by age category for skin-related sites, USA, 1988–2012.

Most patients (794/1040 with information reported, 76%) did not report any pre-existing conditions. Another 204 (15%) reported one or more comorbidities. Heart disease and diabetes were the most commonly reported comorbidities (among those with information reported, 107/894 (10%) and 107/895 (10%), respectively). Alcohol use (47, 5%), liver disease (28, 3%), and immunodeficiency (28, 3%) were each relatively uncommon overall. However, in patients with blood infection, 42% (16/38) reported diabetes, 36% (20/56) heart disease, 11% (6/56) alcoholism, and 5% (3/56) liver disease. Comorbid conditions were uncommon in patients with ear infections (no single condition was reported by >2%) and lower extremity infections. Diabetes was reported in 15% (58/386) of patients with lower extremity infections, and heart disease in 11% (49/455). Overall, cellulitis (396/1022, 39%) and fever (198/1006, 20%) were the most commonly reported clinical findings at presentation. Fever was infrequently reported by patients with ear infections (<15%) (Table 2). Diarrhoea was very common in patients with GI infections (84%), as was cellulitis in patients with blood (49%) and lower extremity (66%) infections. Patients with GI infection reported a median of 10 stools per day (range 3 to >24); 28% (12/43) reported bloody stools. Hospitalisation was reported by 20% of patients, and 1% (12) died. Information on cause of death was available for seven and included drowning (2), cardiac causes (6, specified as heart failure in 3), and intracerebral haemorrhage (1). V. alginolyticus was isolated from the blood in 8 (66%) of the 12 patients who died. Most patients were treated with antibiotics (1047/1156, 91%), but the details of antibiotic therapy were rarely reported. Most patients with blood infections were hospitalised (43/51, 84%), whereas about a quarter of patients with GI infection (14/58, 24%), lower extremity infection (104/419, 25%), and other skin-related infections (61/237, 26%) were hospitalised. Hospitalisation was uncommon in patients with ear infections (5/388, 1%). Any type of invasive treatment or complication was reported in 18% of patients with blood infections and 11% of those with lower extremity infections. These complications and invasive treatments were described in 60 of the non-foodborne infections, including debridement (33%), amputation (13%), skin grafting (12%), and hearing loss (3%) (Table 1). Debridement, skin grafts, and amputation were most commonly reported by patients with lower extremity infections, although some type of surgery or wound care were also reported by patients with ear or other skin-related site infections. None of the patients with GI disease reported complications or invasive treatment (Table 2).

Table 2. Clinical findings and complications and invasive treatment by infection site, Vibrio alginolyticus infections, USA, 1988–2012

* Gastrointestinal (GI).

Lower extremity (LE).

Complications and invasive treatment were: debridement (19), skin graft (9), other surgery or wound care (15), amputation (8), and hearing loss (2).

Circumstances of exposure

A likely transmission route could be assigned for all but 89 (6%) reported infections, with non-foodborne transmission accounting for 86% (1141/1331) and foodborne transmission for 8% (101). Of patients with non-foodborne infections, 83% (829/998) reported exposure to a body of water, usually salt water (706/802, 88%). The most commonly reported water-related activities among these patients were swimming, diving, or wading (595/758, 78%), followed by walking on the beach, shore, or falling on rocks or shells (370/661, 56%), and boating, skiing, or surfing (197/641, 31%). Activities such as cleaning seafood, being bitten by sea life, or performing construction or repairs were uncommon. Wound exposure was reported by 71% (521/745) of patients with non-foodborne transmission, with 50% of wounds sustained during the water activity (258), 44% reported as pre-existing (229), and the remainder unknown. A variety of pre-existing wounds were described, including chronic ulcerations of the feet and lower extremities, recently sustained cuts, scrapes, or bug bites, as well as history of ear-related wounds described in more detail below. Exposures did not differ substantially by geographical region or by gender.

The types of water activity reported were similar for patients with lower extremity and ear infections. However, patients with a lower extremity infection were more likely to have reported wound exposure (of wounds either sustained during activity or pre-existing) during water activity (294/329 (89%)) than patients with ear infections (68/198 (34%)). Fifty-eight patients with ear infections gave a description of a wound or other breach of the tympanic membrane (either sustained during activity or pre-existing), with 19 reporting tympanic membrane rupture and 14 reporting pre-existing tympanostomy tubes. Patients whose illness was categorised as foodborne reported eating a variety of seafood, most commonly fish, shrimp, crab, and clams. The majority of patients with a GI infection were categorised with foodborne transmission (55/62 (89%)). Seven patients with GI infection whose illnesses were not categorised as foodborne all had stool isolates and reported water exposure but did not report seafood consumption. V. alginolyticus was isolated from the stool in 61 patients with GI infection and from the gallbladder in one. We do not have information on whether additional pathogens were identified in stool specimens from these patients.

DISCUSSION

Our analysis of 25 years of US National Surveillance Data shows that 95% of V. alginolyticus infections were non-foodborne, primarily waterborne. This transmission pattern contrasts with other Vibrio species [Reference Scallan7, 8, Reference Mead25], which are transmitted primarily by food, and it leads to several characteristic epidemiologic findings. First, more than 95% of V. alginolyticus infections were reported from coastal states. Second, skin-related infection sites, mainly of the lower extremities and external ear, account for a large majority of V. alginolyticus infections, likely because transmission occurs primarily through direct contact with water. Third, ear infections predominated in children, whereas lower extremity infections predominated in older adults. Routine beach activities, such as swimming, diving, or wading; walking on a beach or shore; or boating, skiing, or surfing were most commonly reported; some patients reported falling on rocks or shells, but for the most part, the exposures were not traumatic. We hypothesise that the predominance of males overall and of ear infections in younger age groups and lower extremity infections in older adults reflect exposure-related factors. These findings indicate that effective prevention could be targeted to the coasts and to beachgoers and persons whose work involves salt water activities, although it would ideally not be limited to these groups, since disease is not limited to these groups. Our data also suggest that incidence has increased markedly, although improved awareness of and surveillance for infections may explain some part of the increase.

A closer look at skin-related infection sites reveals some interesting but unexplained observations. For instance, we observed that ear infections were relatively evenly distributed across all coastal regions, while lower extremity infections were more common in the Gulf Coast. We wondered whether Gulf Coast catastrophes – Hurricane Katrina in 2005 and the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010 – might have been associated with higher risk of lower extremity infections, but temporal analyses did not support this idea (data not shown). Also, a higher proportion of infections were of the blood in the Atlantic and Gulf Coast regions than in the Pacific region. Differences in exposure do not appear to explain these observations, as exposures for patients with non-foodborne infections did not differ substantially by region. There is data suggesting that other Vibrio species, such as vulnificus and parahaemolyticus are present in higher concentrations in both water and shellfish, and for a longer part of the year, in the Gulf Coast compared with other US coastal regions [Reference Motes26, Reference DePaola27]. This supports the possibility that patients are exposed to higher concentrations of V. alginolyticus in Gulf Coast waters. It is also possible that mild infections are less likely to be diagnosed in areas with lower incidence.

Our review sheds light on clinical aspects of V. alginolyticus infection. As in other studies, our review shows that V. alginolyticus was rarely isolated from stool [Reference Newton1, Reference Dechet, Koram and Painter6, Reference Pien, Lee and Higa19]. Stool isolation does not in itself elucidate whether V. alginolyticus was a cause of diarrhoea or was present incidentally. Stool culture is unlikely to be performed in patients who do not have diarrhoea. Therefore, although the patients categorised as having GI infection in our review usually had both diarrhoea and seafood exposure, without a control group, it is unclear whether V. alginolyticus is associated with GI symptoms. Our data indicate that most patients with V. alginolyticus infection were generally healthy before their infection and confirm that liver disease, alcohol use, and immunodeficiency are seen less commonly with V. alginolyticus infections than in V. vulnificus infection [Reference Dechet, Koram and Painter6]. However, in our data, patients in whom V. alginolyticus was isolated from the blood were more likely to report diabetes mellitus, heart disease, or alcoholism than patients with infection at other sites. Too, the proportion of patients in our review with these conditions is greater than the proportion in corresponding age groups in the general population [21, Reference Mozaffarian22, 24]. These comorbid conditions may increase the risk of invasive infection after an initial skin or soft tissue infection, although none of the patients in our reports had isolates from more than one site.

Not surprisingly, clinical features of V. alginolyticus infection reflect the site of infection, with cellulitis usually reported in lower extremity infections, sometimes with bullae, and fever usually reported in blood infections, sometimes with shock. Overall, fever was relatively uncommon. None of the clinical features on the COVIS report form were common in ear infections, likely because the form has no ear-specific items. Although our data did not frequently describe ear infections specific to the middle ear, numerous patients reported injury to the tympanic membrane or pre-existing tympanostomy tubes, leading us to believe our data underestimates the amount of otitis media present. The mortality rate in our review was low, but as supported by previous case reports [Reference Gomez9, Reference Opal and Saxon11, Reference Patterson, Bell and Bia13, Reference Pien, Lee and Higa19, Reference Lee20], morbidity was substantial, including complications requiring debridement, skin grafting, and in some cases even amputation. Almost all patients were treated with antibiotics, but the data do not allow us to assess timeliness of diagnosis and appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy overall or in patients with more severe infections or outcomes. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing conducted by the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS) show that V. alginolyticus isolates are almost always resistant to ampicillin and susceptible to other agents [28].

Although changes in reporting related to vibriosis becoming nationally notifiable make interpretation of possible increasing infections in other regions more challenging, the large increase we observed in the Gulf Coast is unlikely to be attributable entirely to surveillance artefact or increased clinical suspicion because COVIS surveillance has been active in this region for more than two decades. The laboratory methods used for detection of Vibrio species did not change significantly during the study period. Some authors have proposed that warming of surface water temperatures and an increase in water salinity could lead to increased exposure to this organism [Reference Schets29Reference Sganga32]. In Europe, vibriosis outbreaks have been associated with heatwaves [Reference Schets33, Reference Frank34]. Data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration indicate that surface water temperatures have increased along the US coasts as well as in many coastal regions worldwide [23].

Our results indicate roles for both primary prevention of infection and secondary prevention of bad outcomes. Avoiding all exposure to natural bodies of marine or estuarine water when a wound is present would likely greatly reduce risk but may be unrealistic for many. Wearing a waterproof dressing and washing wounds immediately after water exposure may provide some protection [35, Reference Vugia37, Reference Weis38]. Seeking care early if a wound is worsening is important. The data give little insight into the types of pre-existing wounds that pose the greatest risk for V. alginolyticus infection. Guidance is still needed regarding prevention of external otitis and the best method of preventing wound exposure, but parents and paediatricians should be aware of V. alginolyticus as a potential cause of both otitis externa and otitis media, especially in coastal areas and among patients with water exposure or ear trauma. Physicians may want to consider the depth or extent of pre-existing wounds and the risk of severe outcomes in particular patients when giving advice regarding water activity. Education of healthcare providers, especially those working in coastal areas, on the presentation of and risk factors for V. alginolyticus infection might help with timely diagnosis and treatment. Several case reports describe repeated hospitalisations for severe but unrecognised V. alginolyticus infection resulting in the need for surgical management [Reference Gomez9Reference Patterson, Bell and Bia13]. Thus, consideration of Vibrio in a patient with salt water exposure and lower extremity or ear infections is important, so that appropriate treatment can be initiated, and diagnostic testing can be requested. For example, alerting the laboratory that V. alginolyticus is an organism of interest should prompt the laboratory to plate the specimen on buffered charcoal yeast extract agar plates in addition to the standard media, in order to increase the likelihood that Vibrio will be isolated, if present. At the same time, continued collaboration between federal, state, and local health and environmental agencies to monitor V. alginolyticus infections in humans and in the environment, as well as continue to investigate the exposures identified as increasing risk of infection, is important to monitor whether the increases we have documented continue.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268817000140

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The findings and conclusions in this presentation are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

Footnotes

1 Gulf Coast (Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas), Atlantic (Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, North Carolina, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, South Carolina, and Virginia), Pacific (California, Hawaii, Oregon, Washington, and Alaska), Non-Coastal states including the District of Columbia.

References

REFERENCES

1. Newton, A, et al. Increasing rates of vibriosis in the United States, 1996–2010: review of surveillance data from 2 systems. Clinical Infectious Disease 2012; 54 (Suppl. 5): S391S395.Google Scholar
2. Altekruse, SF, et al. Vibrio gastroenteritis in the US Gulf of Mexico region: the role of raw oysters. Epidemiology and Infection 2000; 124: 489495.Google Scholar
3. Daniels, NA, et al. Vibrio parahaemolyticus infections in the United States, 1973–1998. Journal of Infectious Diseases 2000; 181: 16611666.Google Scholar
4. Horseman, MA, Surani, S. A comprehensive review of Vibrio vulnificus: an important cause of severe sepsis and skin and soft-tissue infection. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 2011; 15: e157e166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Pickering, LK, Peter, G, Shulman, ST. The Red Book through the ages. Pediatrics 2013; 132: 898906.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Dechet, AM, Koram, N, Painter, J. Non-foodborne Vibrio infections: an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States, 1997–2006. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2008; 46: 7.Google Scholar
7. Scallan, E, et al. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—major pathogens. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2011; 17: 715.Google Scholar
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Cholera and Other Vibrio Illness Surveillance (COVIS), summary data, 2008–2012. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services. (https://www.cdc.gov/vibrio/surveillance.html). Accessed 19 December 2014.Google Scholar
9. Gomez, JM, et al. Necrotizing fasciitis due to Vibrio alginolyticus in an immunocompetent patient. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2003; 41: 34273429.Google Scholar
10. Li, XC, et al. Endophthalmitis caused by Vibrio alginolyticus . Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2009; 47: 33793381.Google Scholar
11. Opal, SM, Saxon, JR. Intracranial infection by Vibrio alginolyticus following injury in salt water. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1986; 23: 373374.Google Scholar
12. Rubin, SJ, Tilton, RC. Isolation of Vibrio alginolyticus from wound infections. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1975; 2: 556558.Google Scholar
13. Patterson, TF, Bell, SR, Bia, FJ. Vibrio alginolyticus cellulitis following coral injury. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 1988; 61: 507512.Google Scholar
14. Bonner, JR, et al. Spectrum of Vibrio infections in a Gulf Coast community. Annals of Internal Medicine 1983; 99: 464469.Google Scholar
15. Hartley, JW, et al. Vibrio alginolyticus in the U.K. Journal of Infection 1991; 23: 223.Google Scholar
16. Penland, RL, Boniuk, M, Wilhelmus, KR. Vibrio ocular infections on the U.S. Gulf Coast. Cornea 2000; 19: 2629.Google Scholar
17. Reilly, GD, et al. Vibrio alginolyticus-associated wound infection acquired in British waters, Guernsey, July 2011. Euro Surveillance 2011; 16.Google Scholar
18. Ryan, WJ. Marine vibrios associated with superficial septic lesions. Journal of Clinical Pathology 1976; 29: 10141015.Google Scholar
19. Pien, F, Lee, K, Higa, H. Vibrio alginolyticus infections in Hawaii. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1977; 5: 670672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Lee, DY, et al. Septic shock due to Vibrio alginolyticus in a cirrhotic patient: the first case in Korea. Yonsei Medical Journal 2008; 49: 329332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: 2009–2012. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services. (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/). Accessed: 5 June, 2015.Google Scholar
22. Mozaffarian, D, et al. Prevalence of coronary heart disease by age and sex. Circulation 2015; 131: e29e322. Accessed 26 July 16.Google Scholar
23. Climate Change Indicators in the United States. United States Environmental Protection Agency. June 2015. (https://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/science/indicators/oceans/sea-surface-temp.html). Accessed 26 July 16.Google Scholar
24. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National Diabetes Statistics Report, 2014. (http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pdfs/data/2014-report-estimates-of-diabetes-and-its-burden-in-the-united-states.pdf). Accessed 26 July 16.Google Scholar
25. Mead, PS, et al. Food-related illness and death in the United States. Emerging Infectious Diseases 1999; 5: 607625.Google Scholar
26. Motes, ML, et al. Influence of water temperature and salinity on Vibrio vulnificus in Northern Gulf and Atlantic Coast oysters (Crassostrea virginica). Applied and Environmental Microbiology 1998; 64: 14591465.Google Scholar
27. DePaola, A, et al. Incidence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in US coastal waters and oysters. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 1990; 58: 22992302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System: Enteric Bacteria; Human Isolates Final Report, 2012. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services. (https://www.cdc.gov/narms/pdf/2012-annual-report-narms-508c.pdf). Accessed 8 January 2015.Google Scholar
29. Schets, FM, et al. Potentially human pathogenic vibrios in marine and fresh bathing waters related to environmental conditions and disease outcome. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 2011; 214: 399406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30. Semenza, JC, et al. Knowledge mapping for climate change and food- and waterborne diseases. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 2012; 42: 378411.Google Scholar
31. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Geneva, Switzerland, 2007.Google Scholar
32. Sganga, G, et al. Global climate change and wound care: case study of an off-season Vibrio alginolyticus infection in a healthy man. Ostomy Wound Management 2009; 55: 6062.Google Scholar
33. Schets, FM, et al. Vibrio alginolyticus infections in the Netherlands after swimming in the North Sea. Euro Surveillance 2006; 11: E061109.3.Google Scholar
34. Frank, C, et al. Vibrio vulnificus wound infections after contact with the Baltic Sea, Germany. Euro Surveillance 2006; 11: E060817.1.Google Scholar
35. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Vibrio illnesses after Hurricane Katrina--multiple states, August-September 2005. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2005; 54: 928931.Google Scholar
36. Hornstrup, MK, Gahrn-Hansen, B. Extraintestinal infections caused by Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio alginolyticus in a Danish county, 1987–1992. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 1993; 25: 735740.Google Scholar
37. Vugia, DJ, et al. Impact of 2003 state regulation on raw oyster-associated Vibrio vulnificus illnesses and deaths, California, USA. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2013; 19: 12761280.Google Scholar
38. Weis, KE, et al. Vibrio illness in Florida, 1998–2007. Epidemiology and Infection 2011; 139: 591598.Google Scholar
39. Morris, JG Jr., Black, RE. Cholera and other vibrioses in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine 1985; 312: 343350.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Annual incidence of Vibrio alginolyticus infections per 100 000 population nationally (1996–2012) and by region (2007–2012), USA.

Figure 1

Table 1. Characteristics of Vibrio alginolyticus infections, USA, 1988–2012

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Percentage of Vibrio alginolyticus infections by age category for skin-related sites, USA, 1988–2012.

Figure 3

Table 2. Clinical findings and complications and invasive treatment by infection site, Vibrio alginolyticus infections, USA, 1988–2012

Supplementary material: File

Jacobs Slifka supplementary material

Table S1

Download Jacobs Slifka supplementary material(File)
File 14.5 KB