Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T21:58:34.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ventilation conditions and air-borne bacteria and particles in operating theatres: proposed safe economies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

R. P. Clark ,
P. J. Reed ,
D. V. Seal  and
M. L. Stephenson
R. P. Clark
Affiliation:
Division of Bio-Engineering, Clinical Research Centre, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex
P. J. Reed
Affiliation:
Division of Communicable Diseases, Clinical Research Centre, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex
D. V. Seal
Affiliation:
Division of Communicable Diseases, Clinical Research Centre, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex
M. L. Stephenson
Affiliation:
Division of Communicable Diseases, Clinical Research Centre, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Concentrations of air-borne bacteria and particles have been measured in turbulently ventilated operating theatres in full flow, half flow and zero flow conditions. Increased air-borne challenge produced by human activity and by mechanical cleaning procedures is demonstrated: die-away of this contamination is shown to be related to the ventilation rate. Ventilation can be reduced or turned off at night and during weekends, and cleaning can also be carried out, without increased risk of infection if full flow is restored one hour prior to preparation for surgery. Areas surrounding the theatres should remain at positive pressure with regard to the general hospital environment during low or no flow periods. The implementation of such energy-saving policies will substantially reduce theatre running costs without introducing infection hazards.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 95 , Issue 2 , October 1985 , pp. 325 - 335
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

References

REFERENCES

Charnley, Sir J. (1980). Theatre design. In Controversies in Surgical Sepsis (ed. Karran, S.). New York and Eastbourne: Praeger.Google Scholar
Howorth, F. H. (1984). The air in the operating theatre. In The Design and Utilization of Operating Theatres (ed.Johnston, Ivan D. A. and Hunter, Andrew R.). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Lidwell, O. M. (1981). Airborne bacteria and surgical infection. American Journal of Medicine 70, 693–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lidwell, O. M., Lowbury, E. J. L., Whyte, W., Blowers, R., Stanley, S. J. & Lowe, D. (1983). Airborne contamination of wounds in joint replacement operations: the relationship to sepsis rate. Journal of Hospital Infection 4, 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lidwell, O. M. (1984). Bacteriological considerations. In The Design and Utilization of Operating Theatres (ed. Johnston, Ivan D.A. and Hunter, Andrew R.). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Working Party (1972). Report of a Joint Working Party on Ventilation in Operating Suites (Lidwell, chairman O. M.). London: Medical Research Council and Department of Health and Social Security.Google Scholar