Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:25:21.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tetanus. Analysis of 1458 Cases, which occurred in Home Military Hospitals during the years 1914—1918

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

David Bruce
David Bruce
Affiliation:
Chairman, War Office Committee for the Study of Tetanus.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The purpose of this paper is to place on record the available figures relating to cases of tetanus which occurred in Home Military Hospitals during the Great War of 1914–1918. It may be considered that some of the tables give no very useful or practical information, but they are nevertheless recorded in order that medical officers at the outbreak of some future war may have the opportunity of learning what was done for the prevention and treatment of tetanus during this war. For example nothing can be gained from a study of the figures given in this analysis with regard to the curative or therapeutic value of antitetanic serum, but it may be of some antiquarian interest half a century hence to know the amount given and the mode of administration in the years 1914–1918.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , July 1920 , pp. 1 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1920

References

REFERENCES

A.M.D. 2, War Office (Issued by) (1917). Memorandum on the use of curative sera.Google Scholar
A.M.D. 2, War Office (Issued by) (1917). Notes on the nursing of tetanus.Google Scholar
A.M.D. 2, War Office (Issued by) (1918). Memorandum on Tetanus (4th Edition).Google Scholar
Andrewes, F. W. (5. v. 1917). On the Intrathecal route for the administration of tetanus antitoxin. Lancet.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Stanley (17. III. 1917). Tetanus relapse after a trivial operation. Brit. Med. Journ.Google Scholar
Bowlby, Sir Anthony (2. VIII. 1919). A sketch of the growth of the Surgery of the front in France. Brit. Med. Journ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, Sir David (23. x. 1915). An analysis of cases of tetanus treated in Home Military Hospitals from August 1914 to August 1915. Lancet.Google ScholarPubMed
Bruce, Sir David (2. XII. 1916). 2nd analysis of cases of tetanus treated in Home Military Hospitals from August 1, 1915 to July 31, 1916. Lancet.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, Sir David (30. VI. 1917). 3rd analysis of cases of tetanus treated in Home Military Hospitals from August to October 1916. Lancet.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, Sir David (15. XII. 1917). 4th analysis of cases of tetanus treated in Home Military Hospitals from October to December 1916. Lancet.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, Sir David (22. XII. 1917). 5th analysis of cases of tetanus treated in Home Military Hospitals from December 1916 to March 1917. Lancet.Google Scholar
Bruce, Sir David (16. III. 1918). 6th analysis of cases of tetanus treated in Home Military Hospitals from June 1917. Brit. Med. Journ. (Summary only).Google Scholar
Bruce, Sir David (12. X. 1918). 7th, 8th and 9th analyses of cases of tetanus treated in Home Military Hospitals from June 1917 to April 1918. Brit. Med. Journ. (Summary only).Google Scholar
Bruce, Sir David (XI. 1917). Tetanus in Home Military Hospitals. Analysis of 1000 cases. Trans. Soc. Trop. Med. and Hyg.Google Scholar
Bruce, Sir David (27. I. 1917). Note on the incidence of tetanus among wounded soldiers. Brit. Med. Journ.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruce, Sir David (13. I. 1917). Importance of early prophylactic injection in trench foot. Brit. Med. Journ.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruce, Sir David (5. V. 1917). Intramuscular versus the Intrathecal route in the treatment of tetanus by the injection of antitoxin. Lancet.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, Sir David (XII. 1918). Tetanus. War Medicine.Google ScholarPubMed
Bullock, W. E. and Cramer, W. (15. V. 1919). On a new factor in the mechanism of bacterial infection. Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser. B. XC. 513.Google Scholar
Cummins, S. L. and Gibson, H. Graeme (I. III. 1919). An analysis of cases of tetanus occurring in the British Armies in France between November 1, 1916 and December 31, 1917. Lancet.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, H. R. (5. V. 1917). Report on twenty-five cases of tetanus. Lancet.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, M. (2. II. 1917). Delayed tetanus in connection with fractures. Brit. Med. Journ.Google Scholar
Gibson, H. G. (15. IX. 1917). A note on the reflexes in tetanus. Lancet.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, H. Graeme (XII. 1918). Discussion on tetanus. War Medicine, p. 745.Google Scholar
Goadby, Sir K. (X. 1915). A report on the injection of antitetanus serum in tetanus cases. Journ. Roy. Army Corps.Google Scholar
Goadby, Sir K. (25. V. 1918). The bacterial flora of war wounds. Brit. Med. Journ.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golla, F. (5. V. 1917). A comparison of subcutaneous with intravenous and intrathecal administration of tetanus antitoxin in experimental tetanus. Lancet.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golla, F. (29. II. 1918). Analysis of recent tetanus statistics. Lancet.Google Scholar
Leishman, Sir W. B. and Smallman, A. B. (27. I. 1917). An analysis of recent cases of tetanus in the B.E.F. Lancet.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacConkey, A. T. (10. X. 1914). Tetanus: its prevention and treatment by means of antitetanic serum. Brit. Med. Journ.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacConkey, A. T. (11. XII. 1915). The prophylaxis of tetanus: a Summary. Brit. Med. Journ.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacConkey, A. T. (6. I. 1917). Keeping qualities of therapeutic serum. Brit. Med. Journ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacConkey, A. T. and Zilva, S. S. (18. III. 1916). Iodine in tetanus. Brit. Med. Journ.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacConkey, A. T. and Homer, A. (17. II. 1917). On the passive immunity conferred by a prophylactic dose of antitetanic serum. Lancet.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacConkey, A. T. and Homer, A. (III. 1917). A plea for a collective study of tetanus. Journ. Roy. Army Corps.Google Scholar
Ransom, F. (22. XII. 1917). A modern view of tetanus. Lancet.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherrington, (29. XII. 1917). Observations with antitetanus serum in the monkey. Lancet.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulloch, W. J. (2. IV. 1918). The isolation and serological differentiation of B. tetani. Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser. B, XC. 145.Google Scholar
Tulloch, W. J. (1. VI. 1918). Concomitant anaerobic injections in tetanus. Brit. Med. Journ.Google Scholar
Tulloch, W. J. (1. VII. 1919). The distribution of the serological types of B. tetani in wounds of men who received prophylactic inoculation and a study of the mechanism of infection in and immunity from tetanus. Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser. B. XC. 529.Google Scholar
Tulloch, W. J. (29. VIII. 1919). Report on bacteriological investigations undertaken on behalf of the War Office Committee for the study of Tetanus. Journ. Hyg. XVIII. 103–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worster-Drought, C. C. (I. 1918). Observations on a severe case of tetanus treated with repeated intrathecal injections of antitoxin. Journ. Roy. Army Corps.Google Scholar
Worster-Drought, C. C. (1. VI. 1918). A case illustrating an extreme modification of local tetanus. Lancet.CrossRefGoogle Scholar