Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:11:32.050Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Study of Tubercle Bacilli isolated from cases of Surgical Tuberculosis (chiefly Bone and Joint) in the Sheffield Area

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. W. Edington  and
D. Guest
J. W. Edington
Affiliation:
(From the Department of Pathology, University of Sheffield.)
D. Guest
Affiliation:
(From the Department of Pathology, University of Sheffield.)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

General interest was first aroused regarding the respective powers of the human and bovine types of the tubercle bacillus to infect the human subject by the address of Koch at the Tuberculosis Congress in 1901. In this he stated that the two types produced different diseases, and that the amount of human tuberculosis due to infection by the bovine type of the tubercle bacillus was negligible.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , February 1926 , pp. 109 - 118
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1926

References

REFERENCES

Borrel, , Coulon, , Boez, and Quimaud, (10, 02 1922). C. R. Soc. Biol. p. 388.Google Scholar
Calmette, and Guérin, (28, 12 1908). C. R. Acad. des Sc. cxlvii. 1456.Google Scholar
Eastwood, and Griffith, F. (1916). Journ. of Hyg. xv. 257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyre, (1916). Bacteriological Technique, 2nd ed.Google Scholar
Fildes, (1920). Brit. Journ. of Exper. Path. i. 129.Google Scholar
Fraser, (1912). Journ. of Exper. Med. xvi 432.Google Scholar
Griffith, A. S. (1911), in Final Report of the Royal Commission on Tuberculosis, Part 2, Appendix, Vol. i. 28Google Scholar
Griffith, A. S. (1916), Journ. of Path, and Bad. xxi. 54.Google Scholar
Griffith, A. S. and Griffith, F. (1907), in the 2nd Interim Report of the Royal Commission on Tuberculosis, Part 2, Appendix, Vol. iii. 3.Google Scholar
Koch, (1901). Brit. Med. Journ. ii. 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, (1922). Special Report Series of the Medical Research Council, No. 63, p. 7.Google Scholar
Mitchell, (1916). Journ. of Path. and Bact. xxi. 260Google Scholar
Mitchell, (1925). Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. xviii. 100–104.Google Scholar
Twort, C. C. (9. 12 1922). Lancet, cciii. 1221.Google Scholar
Williams, and Burdick, (1916). Journ. of Bact. i. 413.Google Scholar