Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T19:11:20.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the serological relationships between avian pox, sheep pox, goat pox and vaccinia viruses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

P. K. Uppal  and
P. R. Nilakantan
P. K. Uppal
Affiliation:
Indian Veterinary Reasearch Institute, Mukteswar, Izatnagar, U. P. India
P. R. Nilakantan
Affiliation:
Indian Veterinary Reasearch Institute, Mukteswar, Izatnagar, U. P. India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

By using neutralization, complement fixation and immunogel-diffusion tests, it has been demonstrated that cross-reactions occur between various avian pox viruses and between sheep pox and goat pox viruses. No such reactions were demonstrated between avian pox viruses and vaccinia virus or between avian pox and sheep pox and goat pox viruses. Furthermore, no serological relationship was demonstrable between vaccinia virus and sheep pox and goat pox viruses.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 68 , Issue 3 , September 1970 , pp. 349 - 358
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

References

REFERENCES

Beveridge, W. I. B. & Burnet, F. M. (1946). The cultivation of viruses and rickettsiae in the chick embryo. Medical Research Council Special Report Series, No. 256. London.Google Scholar
Bhambani, B. D. & Murty, D. K. (1963). An immuno-diffusion test for laboratory diagnosis of sheep pox and goat pox. Journal of Comparative Pathology and Therapeutics, 73, 349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burnet, F. M. & Lush, D. (1936). The immunological relationship between Kikuth's canary virus and fowl-pox. British Journal of Experimental Pathology, 17, 302.Google Scholar
Datt, N. S. (1964). Comparative studies of pig pox and vaccinia viruses. II. Serological relationship. Journal of Comparative Pathology and Therapeutics, 74, 70.Google Scholar
Datt, N. S. & Orlans, E. S. (1958). The immunological relationship of the vaccinia and pig-pox viruses demonstrated by gel diffusion. Immunology 1, 81.Google Scholar
Downie, A. W. & Macdonald, A. (1950). A study of the pox viruses by complement fixation and inhibition of complement-fixation methods. Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology, 62, 389.Google Scholar
Gispen, R. (1955). Analysis of pox-virus antigens by means of double diffusion. A method for direct serological differentiation of cow pox. Journal of Immunology 74, 134.Google Scholar
Harada, K. & Matamato, M. (1962). Antigenic relationship between mammalian and avian pox viruses as revealed by complement fixation reaction. Japanese Journal of Experimental Medicine 32, 369.Google Scholar
Ledingham, J. C. G. (1931). The aetiological importance of the elementary bodies in vaccinia and fowl-pox. Lancet II, 525.Google Scholar
McCartney, K. L. & Downie, A. W. (1948). An investigation of immunological relationships between the viruses of variola, vaccinia, cowpox and ectromelia by neutralization tests on the chorio-allantois of chick embryos. British Journal of Experimental Pathology 29, 501.Google Scholar
Miyamoto, T. (1959). Studies on canary pox occurring in Japan. 1. Isolation and identification of the causative agent. Japanese Journal of Veterinary Science 21, 77.Google Scholar
Rao, G. C. (1965). Studies on pox in ducks in Andhra Pradesh. Indian Veterinary Journal 42, 151.Google Scholar
Rice, C. E. (1948). Inhibitory effects of certain avian and mammalian antisera in specific complement-fixation systems. Journal of Immunology 59, 365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sen, K. C. & Datt, N. S. (1968). Studies on goat pox virus. II. Serological reactions. Indian Journal of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry 38, 394.Google Scholar
Sharma, S. N., Nilakantan, P. R. & Dhanda, M. R. (1966). A preliminary note on pathogenicity and antigenicity of sheep and goat pox viruses. Indian Veterinary Journal 43, 673.Google Scholar
Takahashi, M., Kameyama, S., Kato, S. & Kamahora, J. (1959). The immunological relationship of the poxvirus group. Biken's Journal 2, 27.Google Scholar
Takano, K. (1948). Lapinization of fowl pox virus by cultivation in the developing chick embryo. Japanese Journal of Bacteriology 3, 47.Google Scholar
Tsubahara, H. & Kato, K. (1961). Application of agar gel precipitation test to bird pox viruses. Bulletin of the National Institute of Animal Health. Tokyo No. 41. p. 43.Google Scholar
Uppal, P. K. (1963). Studies on sheep pox virus M. V. Sc. Thesis University of Agra, India.Google Scholar
Uppal, P. K. & Nilakantan, P. R. (1966). Serological reactions in sheep pox. I. Complement fixation test. Indian Veterinary Journal 43, 949.Google Scholar
Uppal, P. K. & Nilakantan, P. R. (1967). Serological reactions in sheep pox. II. Agar gel diffusion test. Indian Veterinary Journal 44, 347.Google Scholar
Webster, R. G. (1958). The immunological relations of the contagious pustular dermatitis virus to the mammalian box group. Australian Journal of Experimental Biology and Medical Science 36, 267.Google Scholar
Woodroofe, G. M. & Fenner, F. (1962). Serological relationships within the poxvirus group: an antigen common to all members of the group. Virology 16, 334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed