Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:34:19.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies on the pathogenesis of rinderpest in experimental cattle: III. Proliferation of an attenuated strain in various tissues following subcutaneous inoculation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

W. P. Taylor
Affiliation:
East African Veterinary Research Organization, Muguga, P.O. Box 32, Kikuyu, Kenya, East Africa
W. Plowright
Affiliation:
East African Veterinary Research Organization, Muguga, P.O. Box 32, Kikuyu, Kenya, East Africa
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Twenty-five grade cattle were infected subcutaneously with 1040 to 104·6 TCD 50 of a highly-attenuated strain of rinderpest virus which is used as a vaccine. No clinical reaction was observed but the proliferation of virus was studied in twenty-two tissues harvested at daily intervals from the first to the 10th days after inoculation. Serum samples collected at the same times were examined for rinderpest-neutralizing antibody.

There was an ‘eclipse’ phase of 3 days during which no infectivity could be demonstrated in any tissue. On the 4th day virus had generalized, as shown by its detection in lymphoid tissues which were not associated with the site of inoculation; occasional animals showed evidence of viral proliferation in the local muscle and subcutaneous tissue. A considerable growth of virus, with peak titres between 104·0 and 105·0 TDC50/g., was demonstrated in the prescapular, pharyngeal and mesenteric lymph nodes, also in the palatal tonsils and Peyer's patches of the ileum. Highest titres (105·4 TCD50/g.) were recorded in the prescapular haemo-lymph nodes, but less virus (up to 103·4 TCD50/g.) appeared in the spleen.

A low-level viraemia was detected in eight of the thirteen cattle killed on the 5th to 8th days inclusive. Minimal quantities of virus were found on two occasions each in the bone marrow and lung. No virus was recovered from the mucosae of the base of the tongue, abomasum, ileum, caecum and colon; liver, heart, kidney and brain tissue also failed to support its multiplication.

Neutralizing antibody was present in all cattle by the 10th day after inoculation, its appearance being associated with the abrupt decline in virus titres, which was usually demonstrable on the 8th day.

The behaviour of the attenuated virus was compared with that of virulent strains, and it was concluded that its lack of pathogenicity was due primarily to its failure to proliferate in the mucosae of the gastro-intestinal and respiratory tracts. Vaccine virus was, in fact, exclusively ‘lymphotropic’, a characteristic which may account for the solid, lasting immunity it confers and for the considerable antibody response it provokes in inoculated cattle. Inability to spread by contact amongst susceptible cattle may be a result of the absence of virus in mucosae or parenchymatous organs and hence in excretions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

References

Karzon, D. T. & Bang, F. B. (1951). The pathogenesis of infection with a virulent (CG 179) and an avirulent (B) strain of Newcastle disease virus in the chicken. I. Comparative rates of viral multiplication. J. exp. Med. 93, 267–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liess, B. & Plowright, W. (1964). Studies on the pathogenesis of rinderpest in experimental cattle. I. Correlation of clinical signs, viraemia and virus excretion by various routes. J. Hyg., Camb., 62, 81100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacOwan, K. D. S. (1956). Annu. Rep. Dep. vet. Serv., Kenya (1955). Govt. Printer.Google Scholar
Mayr, A. & Wittman, G. (1957). Zur Pathogenese der Hühnerpockeninfektion. III. Teil. Die Pathogenese der Geflügelpockeninfektion des Kückens. Mh. Tierheilk. 9, 4453.Google Scholar
Plowright, W. (1962). The application of monolayer tissue culture techniques in rinderpest research. I. Introduction. Use in serological investigations and diagnosis. Bull. Off. int. Epiz. 57, 123.Google Scholar
Plowkight, W. (1963). Some properties of strains of rinderpest virus recently isolated in E. Africa. Res. vet. Sci. 4, 96108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plowbight, W. (1964). Studies on the pathogenesis of rinderpest in experimental cattle. II. Proliferation of the virus in different tissues following intranasal infection. J. Hyg., Camb., 62, 257–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plowkight, W. & Ferris, R. D. (1959). Studies with rinderpest virus in tissue culture. I. Growth and cytopathogenicity. J. comp. Path. 69, 152–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plowright, W. & Ferris, R. D. (1961). Studies with rinderpest virus in tissue culture. III. The stability of culture virus and its use in virus neutralization tests. Arch. ges. Virus- forsch. 11, 516–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plowright, W. & Ferris, R. D. (1962 a). Studies with rinderpest virus in tissue culture. A technique for the detection and titration of virulent virus in cattle tissues. Res. vet. Sci. 3, 94103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plowright, W. & Ferris, R. D. (1962 b). Studies with rinderpest virus in tissue culture. The use of attenuated culture virus as a vaccine for cattle. Res. vet. Sci. 3, 172–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provost, A. (1960). Virus bovipestique et viandes de boucherie. Documents sur la persistence des virus de certaines maladies animales dans la viande et produits animaux. Paris. (Joint publication by the Office International des Epizooties (OIE) and the Interafrican Bureau of Animal Health (IBAH)).Google Scholar
Roberts, J. A. (1963). Histopathogenesis of mousepox. III. Ectromelia virulence. Brit. J. exp. Path. 44, 465–72.Google ScholarPubMed
Scott, G. R. (1955). Life expectancy of rinderpest virus. Bull. epiz. Dis. Afr. 3, 1920.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. R. (1947). Use of moving averages and interpolation to estimate median effective dose. I. Fundamental formulas, estimation of error and relation to other methods. Bact. Rev. 11, 115–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trautman, A. & Fiebiger, J. (1952). Fundamentals of the Histology of Domestic Animals, 1st English Edition. London: Baillierè, Tindall and Cox.Google Scholar