Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:33:47.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the influence of diet on resistance to infection I. The effect of various diets on the fertility, growth, and survival of mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Marion Watson
Marion Watson
Affiliation:
Division of Bacteriology and Immunology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The observations described in this paper were carried out as a preliminary to a systematic study of the influence of dietetic factors on resistance to infection. The enquiry was initiated under the general direction of Prof. W. W. C. Topley of this School, and Prof. E. P. Cathcart of the University of Glasgow, and has been financed by a grant from the Medical Research Council. It was desired that all aspects of the problem, dietetic, immunological and statistical, should receive full and careful consideration at each stage of the investigation, and that any significant results, positive or negative, should be checked and controlled on a scale that would supply a firm foundation for further studies. To this end, a small advisory committee was formed, soon after the enquiry started, on which Prof. M. Greenwood, Prof. J. C. Drummond, Prof. Edward Mellanby, Dr Harriette Chick, Dr Bradford Hill and Dr Joyce Wilson kindly consented to serve. To all the above, I wish to express my thanks for help and advice. I wish also to acknowledge my indebtedness to Miss J. M. Hatswell for her assistance throughout the greater part of this work.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , July 1937 , pp. 396 - 419
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1937

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, J. & Bullowa, J. G. M. (1910). J. Amer. med. Ass. 55, 1196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, R. P., Fehnel, J. W., Thomson, R. M. & Drinker, K. R. (1926). J. industr. Hyg. 8,322.Google Scholar
Beard, H. H. (1925). Amer. J. Physiol. 75, 645, 658, 682.Google Scholar
Bertrand, C. & Bhattacherjie, R. C. (1934). C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 198, 1823.Google Scholar
Daniel, J. F. (1912). Amer. Nat. 46, 591.Google Scholar
Evans, H. E. & Burr, G. O. (1917). Mem. Univ. Calif. Vol. 8.Google Scholar
Hawk, P. B. (1923). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N.Y., 20, 269.Google Scholar
Hubbell, R. B. & Mendel, L. B. (1927). J. biol. Chem. 75, 567.Google Scholar
Kirkham, W. B. (1920). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol, N.Y., 17, 196.Google Scholar
Mccollum, E. V., Simmonds, N. & Pitz, W. (1916). J. biol. Chem. 28, 483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mccollum, E. V., Simmonds, N. & Pitz, W. (1917). J. biol. Chem. 29, 342.Google Scholar
Mchargue, J. S. (1926). Amer. J. Physiol. 77, 245.Google Scholar
Osborne, T. B. & Mendel, L. B. (1918). J. biol. Chem. 34, 521.Google Scholar
Parkes, A. S. (1924). Brit. J. exp. Biol. 2, 21.Google Scholar
Plimmer, R. H. A. (1921). Analyses and Energy Values of Food. H.M. Stat. Office, London.Google Scholar
Robertson, T. B. (1916). J. biol. Chem. 24, 363.Google Scholar
Robertson, T. B. & Ray, L. A. (1916). J. biol. Chem. 24, 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slonaker, J. R. (1931a). Amer. J. Physiol. 97, 322, 573, 626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slonaker, J. R. (1931b). Amer. J. Physiol. 98, 266.Google Scholar
Thompson, P. K., Marsh, M. & Drinker, K. R. (1927). Amer. J. Physiol. 80, 65.Google Scholar
Topley, W. W. C. (1923). J. Hygiene, 21, 226.Google Scholar
Wheeler, R. (1913). J. exp. Zool. 15, 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar