Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T18:48:56.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Serological epidemiological studies with influenza A viruses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

G. C. Schild  and
C. H. Stuart-Harris
G. C. Schild
Affiliation:
The University of Sheffield Virus Research Laboratory, Lodge Moor Hospital, Sheffield 10
C. H. Stuart-Harris
Affiliation:
The University of Sheffield Virus Research Laboratory, Lodge Moor Hospital, Sheffield 10
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Determinations were made of the age distribution of antibody to swine virus and representatives of the various families of human influenza A virus in 1961–62 collections of human sera and paired sera from forty individuals taken in 1952 and 1963:

(a) The existence of cohorts of the population, each with a dominant antibody type related to strains of virus first encountered in childhood, was confirmed.

(b) The basic epidemiological pattern was similar to that previously detected in 1954. However, it seemed that antibody to swine virus had been reinforced but not antibody to A and A1 strains.

(c) Neutralizing and HI antibodies to A/Equine/Miami/63 virus were detected only in the sera of older people (65 years or over) collected in 1964. No antibodies were found to A/Equine/Prague/56 or two duck viruses.

(d) Relatively constant levels of antibody to A, A1 and A 2 viruses were present in sera from aged persons but antibody to swine virus diminished with age. This could be attributed to a lack of swine antibody in the older females.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 63 , Issue 4 , December 1965 , pp. 479 - 490
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

References

Andrewes, C. H., Laidlaw, P. P. & Smith, W. (1935). Influenza: observations on the 1 recovery of virus from man and on the antibody content of human sera. Br. J. exp. Path. 16, 566.Google Scholar
Clarke, S. K. R., Heath, R. B., Sutton, R. N. P. & Stuart-Harris, C. H. (1958). Sero-logical studies with the Asian strain of influenza A virus. Lancet, i, 814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, F. M. & Hennessy, A. V. (1958). The clinical epidemiology of Asian influenza. Ann. intern. Med. 49, 493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davenport, F. M., Hennessy, A. V., Drescher, J., Mulder, J. & Francis, T. Jr., (1964). Further observations on the relevance of serologic recapitulations of human infection with influenza viruses. J. exp. Med. 120, 1087.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davenport, F. M., Hennessy, A. V. & Francis, T. Jr., (1953). Epidemiologic and immunologic significance of age distribution of antibody to antigenic variants of influenza virus. J. exp. Med. 98, 641.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davenport, F. M., Hennessy, A. V., Stuart-Harris, C. H. & Francis, T. Jr., (1955). Epidemiology of influenza: comparative serological observations in England and the U.S.A. Lancet, ii, 469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davoli, R. & Corsi, O. B. (1957). Anticorpi verso virus dell'mfluenza ‘A-Asia’ nella popo-lazione normale. Sperimentale, 107, 358.Google Scholar
Drescher, J., Hennessy, A. V. & Davenport, F. M. (1962 a). Photometric methods for the measurement of haemagglutinating viruses and antibody. I. Further experience with a novel photometric method for measuring haemagglutinin. J. Immunol. 89, 794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drescher, J., Davenport, F. M. & Hennessy, A. V. (1962 b). Photometric methods for the measurement of haemagglutinating viruses and antibody. II. Further experience with antibody determinations and the description of a technique for analysis of viral mixtures. J. Immunol. 89, 805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, T. Jr., Davenport, F. M. & Hennessy, A. V. (1953). A serological recapitulation of human infection with different strains of influenza virus. Trans. Ass. Am. Phyans, 66, 231.Google ScholarPubMed
Francis, T. Jr., & Magill, T. P. (1936). The incidence of neutralizing antibodies for human influenza virus in the serum of human individuals of different ages. J. exp. Med. 63, 655.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harboe, A. (1963). HI antibodies in ferrets cross-infected with distantly related influenza viruses. Acta path, microbiol. scand. 57, 211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Isaacs, A. (1957). Antibodies to influenza viruses in the sera of Nigerians. J. Hyg., Camb., 55, 485.Google ScholarPubMed
Laidlaw, P. P. (1935). Epidemic influenza: a virus disease. Lancet, i, 1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masurel, N. & Mulder, J. (1962). Studies on the content of haemagglutination-inhibiting antibody for swine influenza virus A. Verh. Inst. prev. Geneesk. 52, 1.Google Scholar
Mulder, J. & Masurel, N. (1958). Pre-epidemic antibody against the 1957 strain of Asiatic influenza in the serum of older persons living in the Netherlands. Lancet, i, 810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shope, R. E. (1936). The incidence of neutralizing antibodies for swine influenza virus in the sera of human beings of different ages. J. exp. Med. 63, 669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vogel, J. & Shelokov, A. (1957). Adsorption—haemagglutination test for influenza virus in monkey kidney tissue culture. Science, 126, 358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization; Expert Committee on Influenza (1953). Tech. Sep. Ser. Wld Hlth Org. no. 64.Google Scholar