Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:01:47.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Public health implications of plasmid-mediated quinolone and aminoglycoside resistance genes in Escherichia coli inhabiting a major anthropogenic river of India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2022

Nambram Somendro Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi, India Department of Biophysics, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi, India
Neelja Singhal*
Affiliation:
Department of Biophysics, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi, India
Manish Kumar
Affiliation:
Department of Biophysics, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi, India
Jugsharan Singh Virdi*
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi, India
*
Authors for correspondence: Neelja Singhal, E-mail: [email protected]; Jugsharan Singh Virdi, E-mail: [email protected]
Authors for correspondence: Neelja Singhal, E-mail: [email protected]; Jugsharan Singh Virdi, E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Presence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes in Escherichia coli inhabiting anthropogenic rivers is an important public health concern because plasmid-mediated AMR genes can easily spread to other pathogens by horizontal gene transfer. Besides β-lactams, quinolones and aminoglycosides are the major antibiotics against E. coli. In the present study, we have investigated the presence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) and aminoglycoside resistance genes in E. coli isolated from a major river of northern India. Our results revealed that majority of the strains were phenotypically susceptible for fluoroquinolones and some aminoglycosides like amikacin, netilmicin, tobramycin and gentamicin. However, 16.39% of the strains were resistant for streptomycin, 8.19% for kanamycin and 3.30% for gentamicin. Of the various PMQR genes investigated, only qnrS1 was present in 24.59% of the strains along with ISEcl2. Aminoglycoside-resistance genes like strA-strB were found to be present in 16.39%, aphA1 in 8.19% and aacC2 in only 3.30% of the strains. Though, no co-relation was observed between phenotypic resistance for fluorquinolones and presence of PMQR genes, phenotypic resistance for streptomycin, kanamycin and gentamicin exactly co-related with the presence of the genes strA-strB, aphA1 and aacC2, respectively. Moreover, all the AMR genes discerned in aquatic E. coli were found to be situated on conjugative plasmids and, thus easily transferrable. Our study accentuates the importance of routine surveillance of urban rivers to curtail the spread of AMR genes in aquatic pathogens.

Type
Original Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Escherichia coli is a diverse bacterial species, strains of which might be commensal or pathogenic in nature. It is primarily an inhabitant of the lower intestinal tract of humans and warm-blooded animals and is discharged in the environment through faeces and wastewater treatment plants [Reference Berthe1]. Among all the members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, E. coli has a remarkable capability to serve as a donor and recipient of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes. It is therefore regarded as a major reservoir of AMR genes which can be disseminated to other bacteria by horizontal gene transfer. Thus, AMR in E. coli is considered as one of the major challenges in both humans and animals, worldwide [Reference Alm2Reference Allcock4].

Besides β-lactams, quinolones and aminoglycosides are the major antibiotics which are used for treatment of infections caused by E. coli. Quinolones target the bacterial DNA gyrase or the topoisomerase IV enzyme, thereby inhibiting DNA replication and transcription. In E. coli, mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining region of the chromosomal DNA gyrase and DNA topoisomerase IV are regarded as an important mechanism underlying fluoroquinolone resistance [Reference Ruiz5, Reference Rodríguez-Martínez6]. Besides chromosomal gene mutations, several plasmid encoded resistance mechanisms have been identified in E. coli like, (i) genes encoding pentapeptide repeat family proteins which protect bacterial DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV from inhibitory effect of quinolones (qnrA to qnrD and qnrS), (ii) aac(6′)-Ib-cr which encodes actyltransferases that modify fluoroquinolones like ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin, and (iii) genes encoding efflux pump proteins like qepA and oqxAB [Reference Awad, Arafat and Elhadidy7]. Since the probability of spontaneous multiple mutations is quite less (10−14 to 10−16 for fluoroquinolones) the plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) determinants might play a major role in enabling bacterial survival in the presence of quinolones [Reference Zhao8]. A research study indicated that although the PMQR genes cannot confer a high level of resistance for quinolones and fluoroquinolones, they might reduce the susceptibility of E. coli for these antibiotics [Reference Jacoby, Strahilevitz and Hooper9]. Several researchers have reported that insertion sequences (IS) play an important role in the mobilisation of PMQR genes [Reference Poirel10, Reference Ruiz11]. IS like ISEcl2 and IS26 have been associated with the mobilisation of PMQR genes like qnrS and aac(6′)-Ib-cr, respectively [Reference Ruiz11]. However, most of the studies regarding PMQR genes and their genetic environment have been conducted on clinical isolates [Reference Poirel10Reference Karah12] and only a few studies have been conducted on aquatic E. coli [Reference Mendonça13Reference Conte15].

Aminoglycosides bind to the 30S ribosomal subunit and interfere with the bacterial protein synthesis. In E. coli, resistance to aminoglycosides can develop by mutations in the 16S rRNA, modification of the drug target(s) or by enzymatic inactivation of aminoglycosides by the bacterial enzymes. Modification of the aminoglycoside target site is performed by 16S rRNA methylases like ArmA, RmtA to RmtH and NmpA which methylate some amino acids of the 16S rRNA, resulting in resistance for amikacin, gentamicin, tobramycin and netilmicin [Reference Griffey16]. In E. coli, three types of aminoglycoside modifying enzymes are known viz., phosphotransferases, acetyltransferases and nucleotidyltransferases. Genes encoding these enzymes are frequently located on plasmids facilitating their transfer to other pathogens. The linked strA-strB genes which encode for aminoglycoside phosphotransferases are the most common streptomycin resistance genes prevalent in E. coli, worldwide. In E. coli, phosphotransferase gene aphA1 which confers kanamycin resistance and aacC2 (an acetyltransferase) that confers gentamicin resistance are also reported [Reference Sáenz17, Reference Ho18].

Most of the studies regarding distribution and characterisation AMR genes have been conducted on clinical isolates of E. coli. Studies regarding the prevalence and characterisation of AMR and virulence genes in E. coli inhabiting natural water bodies, especially urban rivers, are quite less [Reference Dhanji19Reference Kalasseril25]. It is important to study the AMR genes of E. coli, a prominent faecal indicator bacteria residing in urban rivers because these rivers are impacted by various anthropogenic activities. Thus, urban rivers represent a reservoir of diverse E. coli and an ideal ecosystem for transfer and dissemination of AMR genes from aquatic E. coli to other pathogens [Reference Sapkota26Reference Diwan30]. In an earlier study, we had reported the distribution and characteristics of β-lactamase genes of E. coli isolated from Yamuna, a prominent river of northern India [Reference Bajaj31]. A collection of 61 strains representing the four phylogroups of E. coli viz. A, B1 (non-pathogenic phylogroups) and B2, D (pathogenic phylogroups) was investigated [Reference Bajaj31]. Here, we have studied the phenotypic susceptibilities of these E. coli strains for quinolones and aminoglycosides, and the presence of PMQR and plasmid-mediated aminoglycoside resistance genes. We have also tried to discern a correlation between AMR genes and phylogroups, if any. The genetic elements associated with the PMQR genes were also studied to understand their role in the spread of PMQR genes in the environment.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains

A total of 61 strains of E. coli collected from various sites along the entire stretch of river Yamuna across the National Capital Region of India were used in this study. These strains were transported to the laboratory on ice in sterile screw-capped bottles and processed within 6 h. The details of the sampling sites, year of isolation, seasonality and the methods used for enrichment and isolation of E. coli have been described in detail, previously [Reference Bajaj31]. All the strains were confirmed by biochemical testing and sequencing of the gene encoding 16S rDNA. The strains were serotyped at the National Salmonella and Escherichia Centre, Central Research Institute, Kasauli, Himachal Pradesh, India. The phylogenetic profiles of the strains were determined by triplex PCR which revealed that these strains belonged to the phylogroups A, B1, B2 and D [Reference Clermont, Bonacorsi and Bingen32]. The azide-resistant E. coli strain J53 used as the recipient during conjugation experiments was a gift from Dr George A. Jacoby and was provided to us by Dr Sulagna Basu (National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Kolkata, India).

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for quinolones and aminoglycosides

Antimicrobial susceptibilities of all the 61 E. coli strains for quinolones and aminoglycosides were determined by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion test, using antibiotic disks (Himedia, Mumbai, India) and following the guidelines of Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute [33]. The antibiotic disks which were used in this study (charge in μg/disk) included nalidixic acid (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg) and ofloxacin (5 μg) for quinolone susceptibility, and streptomycin (10 μg), kanamycin (30 μg), tobramycin (10 μg), netilmycin (30 μg) and amikacin (30 μg) for aminoglycoside susceptibility.

Detection of PMQR genes

For PCR-based detection of PMQR genes, qnrA, qnrB, qnrC, qnrD, qnrS, qepA, oqxA, oqxB and aac(6′)-Ib-cr, DNA of the E. coli strains was isolated by boiling lysis procedure [Reference Rodríguez-Baño34]. The 25 μl PCR-reaction mixture contained 2.5 μl of 1× buffer, 200 μM of each dNTP, 20 pmol of the forward and reverse primers, 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase and 10 μl of template DNA. PCR was carried out in My Cycler Thermal Cycler, using the published primers and PCR conditions (Table 1). PCR amplicons were purified and sequenced using the methods described earlier [Reference Singhal35]. Briefly, PCR amplicons were visualised after electrophoresis on 1% agarose gels at 80 V and purified using Hi-Yield extraction kit (RBC Bioscience, New Taipei City, Taiwan) following the manufacturer's protocol. The purified amplicons were submitted for sequencing to a commercial facility (Invitrogen BioServices India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India) where they were sequenced using Sanger's method. Similarity search of the nucleotide sequences was performed using NCBI-BLASTn.

Table 1. Details of primers and PCR conditions used for analyses of plasmid-associated quinolone and aminoglycoside resistance genes, and genetic environment of qnrS in E. coli isolated from a major urban river of India

Analysis of the genetic environment of qnrS

Genetic environment of qnrS was analysed by PCR amplification using the published primers and PCR protocol [Reference Poirel10]. Insertion sequences IS26 and ISEcl2 were targeted in the upstream region of qnrS gene. The components of the PCR reaction mixture were the same as used for PCR amplification of PMQR genes. The PCR conditions and the details of the primers are mentioned in Table 1. The PCR amplicons were purified and sequenced as described earlier, using the respective forward primers. Similarity search was performed for the sequences obtained using NCBI-BLAST.

Detection of plasmid-mediated aminoglycoside resistance genes

PCR-based detection of plasmid-mediated aminoglycoside resistance genes encoding 16S rRNA methylases – armA, rmtA, rmtB, rmtC and rmtD and aminoglycoside modifying enzymes – aacC, strA-strB, aphA1, aphA2 was carried out using published primers [Reference Sáenz17, Reference Yamane36]. The components of the PCR reaction mixture and the PCR conditions were the same as for amplification of PMQR genes, except the annealing temperatures, which have been mentioned in Table 1. The amplicons were purified and sequenced as described earlier and the similarity search was performed using NCBI-BLASTn.

Transferability of AMR genes by conjugation and plasmid analysis

To confirm if the PMQR and aminoglycoside resistance genes were transferrable, conjugal transfer of these genes was assessed with a broth culture mating assay using an azide-resistant E. coli J53 as recipient, as also described earlier [Reference Singh, Singhal and Virdi21]. Briefly, the donor and the recipient E. coli J53 strains were separately grown in LB broth at 37 °C, 200 rpm for 12–14 h. Conjugal transfer was carried by mixing each donor and recipient in a 1:1 ratio, followed by incubation at 37 °C for 12–14 h under static conditions. Subsequently, appropriate culture dilutions were spread plated on LB agar containing sodium azide (100 μg/ml) supplemented with ampicillin (100 μg/ml) and incubated at 37 °C for 16–18 h. The transferability of the PMQR (qnrS1, aac(6′)-Ib) and aminoglycoside resistance (strA-strB, aphA1 and aacC2) genes was confirmed by PCR amplification of the plasmid DNA isolated from the transconjugants.

Accession numbers

The partial coding DNA sequence (CDS) of qnrS1 genes including their genetic environment were identical in all the 15 strains, therefore the DNA sequence of only one representative strain (KK16) was submitted to GenBank (NCBI) with the accession number MG434695. Similarly, the partial CDS of strA-strB gene of only one representative strain (ISF) was submitted to NCBI GenBank under the accession number MT995846.

Results and discussion

Quinolone susceptibilities and PMQR genes

The zone diameters (in mm) of the bacterial growth around antibiotic disks of nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin were ≥19, ≥31 and ≥16, respectively, indicating that all the E. coli strains were susceptible to these antibiotics, as also recommended by the CLSI 2018 guidelines [33]. However, the growth zone diameters (in mm) of two E. coli strains IP24 and IPE around the antibiotic disks of nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin ≤14, ≤20 and ≤12, respectively, indicate that both these strains were resistant for these antibiotics. The results of the antibiotic susceptibility testing are presented in Table 2. PCR-based testing revealed that none of the E. coli strains harboured the PMQR genes which encode for the pentapeptide repeat family proteins, qnrA, qnrB, qnrC, qnrD and qepA. Similarly, PMQR efflux genes like oqxA and oqxB were not detected in any strain. However, the PMQR gene qnrS was detected in 24.59% (n = 15) of the strains. The 456 bp amplicon of the qnrS gene of one representative strain was sequenced and similarity search by BLASTn revealed that it shared 99% homology with the qnrS1 gene. Thus, it can be inferred that qnrS1 was the predominant PMQR gene present in river Yamuna E. coli isolates. Earlier studies also reported that qnrS type genes were highly prevalent in E. coli isolated from the waterbodies of the world [Reference Cattoir, Poirel and Nordmann37, Reference Poirel, Cattoir and Nordmann38].

Table 2. Resistance phenotypes and plasmid-associated genes encoding flouro(quinolone) and aminoglycoside resistance in E. coli strains isolated from a major urban river of India

STM, streptomycin; GEN, gentamicin; KAN, kanamycin; NAL, nalidixic acid; CIP, ciprofloxacin; OFX, ofloxacin.

The PMQR gene aac(6′)-Ib-cr was detected in only one E. coli strain (IPE). The aac(6′)-Ib-cr gene encodes for a common aminoglycoside acetyltransferase AAC(6′)-Ib-cr which is involved in acetylation of quinolones. Earlier studies have also reported that qnrS and aac(6′)-Ib-cr were the most frequent PMQR genes in E. coli isolated from environmental sources, worldwide [Reference Varela14, Reference Bönemann39, Reference Rodriguez-Mozaz40]. The PMQR gene qnrS1 was present in strains of both pathogenic and non-pathogenic phylogroups.

Phenotypic resistance to quinolones did not co-relate with the presence of the PMQR genes because several strains of E. coli which were phenotypically susceptible to flouoroquinolones harboured the qnrS1 gene. An earlier study reported that PMQR genes provide a low-level of resistance for flouoroquinolones which though usually do not surpass the clinical breakpoints; they make the treatment difficult [Reference Jacoby, Strahilevitz and Hooper9]. This suggests that clinical breakpoints should be reassessed in the context of PMQR genes, which results in reduced susceptibility and consequent therapeutic failures, despite going undetected by traditional phenotypic methods [Reference Strahilevitz41]. Thus, phenotypic methods for testing flouoroquinolone susceptibilities might result in underestimation of prevalence of quinolone resistance, and confirmation of PMQR genes by PCR is necessary to assess the true flouoroquinolone susceptibilities of E. coli. Moreover, due to the presence of PMQR genes in aquatic E. coli, these could serve as potential reservoirs for undetected spread and dissemination of PMQR genes to other waterborne pathogens.

Genetic environment associated with qnrS1 and aac(6′)-Ib-cr genes

PCR mapping was used to identify the genetic structures associated with qnrS1 in all the qnrS1-positive E. coli strains. PCR amplification resulted in 1113 bp amplicon in each strain. Similarity search revealed that in all the strains, ISEcl2 was present at 303 bp upstream of the start codon of qnrS1 (Table 2). The insertion sequence ISEcl2 belongs to the IS3 family of insertion sequences. The genetic environment associated with qnrS1 was similar to that reported for E. coli isolated from Vietnam and France [Reference Poirel10, Reference Poirel42]. However, the role of ISEcl2 in the mobilisation of qnrS1 gene is not known, so far. The PCR mapping from earlier studies suggested that mobilisation of qnrS1 gene might have occurred as an independent event [Reference Ruiz11].

The genetic elements surrounding the aac(6′)-Ib-cr gene detected in the E. coli strain IPE were also investigated by PCR mapping and similarity search at NCBI. None of the IS, particularly the IS26 which has been widely reported to be present upstream of aac(6′)-Ib-cr, was found in the aac(6′)-Ib-cr-positive E. coli strain of river Yamuna [Reference Ruiz11].

Aminoglycoside susceptibilities and plasmid-mediated aminoglycoside resistance genes

The bacterial growth zone diameters (in mm) around the antibiotic disks of amikacin, netilmicin and tobramycin were ≥17, ≥15 and ≥15, respectively. Thus, all the E. coli strains were considered phenotypically susceptible for amikacin, netilmicin and tobramycin as also recommended by the CLSI 2018 guidelines [33]. However, zone diameters of 16.39% (n = 10) of the E. coli strains around the antibiotic disks of streptomycin were ≤11, of 8.19% (n = 5) strains around kanamycin disks were ≤13 and of 3.30% (n = 2) of the strains around gentamicin disks were ≤ 12 indicating that these strains were resistant for these antibiotics. The results of the antibiotic susceptibility testing are presented in Table 2. Thus, our results are similar to an earlier study which also reported that E. coli isolated from waterbodies of Malaysia exhibited lower levels of resistance for aminoglycosides [Reference Hara43]. However, another study from India reported that E. coli strains isolated from coastal waters of India were highly resistant for streptomycin and gentamicin [Reference Maloo44].

Though 16S rRNA methylase genes have been reported in clinical strains [Reference Wangkheimayum45], very few studies have reported the distribution of these genes in aquatic strains of E. coli [Reference Zurfluh46]. Our results revealed that plasmid-mediated 16S rRNA methylase genes (armA, rmtA, rmtB, rmtC and rmtD) were not present in E. coli strains of river Yamuna. It has been proposed that rRNA methylases that confer resistance to aminoglycosides have not disseminated widely in E. coli for reasons related to fitness [Reference Gutierrez47, Reference Lioy48]. The linked strA-strB genes which encode for phosphotransferases and are reportedly the most prevalent streptomycin resistance genes in E. coli worldwide [Reference Poirel49] were found to be present in only 16.39% (n = 10) of the E. coli isolates (Table 2). A study from Capetown, South Africa also reported a high prevalence of strA-strB in E. coli strains isolated from wastewater effluents [Reference Adefisoye and Okoh50]. The aminoglycoside phosphotransferase gene aphA1 which confers resistance to kanamycin was present in 8.19% (n = 5) of the strains. The aminoglycoside acetyltransferase gene aacC2 that confers resistance to gentamicin was present in only 3.3% (n = 2) of the strains (Table 2). Notably, unlike the quinolones, phenotypic resistance to a particular aminoglycoside antibiotic exactly co-related with the presence of its corresponding resistance gene. It has been reported that genes encoding aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes have disseminated globally [Reference Poirel49]. This might be due to the fact that these genes are frequently found on transposons, which might have played an important role in the dissemination of aminoglycoside resistance across inter- and intra-species boundaries [Reference Ramirez and Tolmasky51]. Interestingly, the aminoglycoside phosphotransferases strA-strB and aphA1 were more prevalent in strains of the pathogenic phylogroup D, than in the strains of the non-pathogenic phylogroups (Table 2).

Co-occurrence of fluoroquinolone and aminoglycoside resistance genes was observed in only six E. coli strains, viz. KK16, WB6, KKA, PA12, IST and IPE.

Analysis of the transconjugants

Analysis of the plasmid DNA isolated from the transconjugants revealed that qnrs1 in the 14 strains and aac(6′)-Ib detected in one E. coli strain were plasmid-mediated and transferrable. Similarly, strA-strB, aphA1 and aacC2 genes were also found to be plasmid-mediated and transferrable. Previous studies have indicated that conjugative plasmids were highly transferable and played a key role in conferring a multi-resistance phenotype to waterborne E. coli [Reference Varela14, Reference Bajaj20, Reference Xia, Ren and Xu52, Reference Laroche-Ajzenberg53].

Conclusion

Of the various PMQR genes investigated, qnrS1 was present in 25% of the strains, and ISEcl2 was present in its upstream region. Among the aminoglycoside resistance genes, genes encoding for strA-strB and aphA1 were present in 16.39% and 8.19% of the E. coli strains, respectively. Though no co-relation was observed between phenotypic resistance for quinolones and PMQR genes, phenotypic resistance for streptomycin, kanamycin and gentamicin co-related well with the presence of plasmid-mediated aminoglycoside resistance genes strA-strB, aphA1 and aacC2, respectively. Since PMQR and aminoglycoside resistance genes were situated on conjugative plasmids they could be easily disseminated to other pathogens. Thus, our study highlights the importance of routine surveillance of microbial population of urban waterbodies to check the wide spread dissemination of antibiotic resistance determinants.

Acknowledgements

NSS is thankful to Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) for Senior Research Fellowship (No. 80/919/2014-ECD-I) and Research Associateship (ISRM/12(33)/2019). NS was supported by Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) Senior Research Associateship (Scientists' Pool Scheme) File no. 13(9089-A)/2019-POOL.

Author contributions

Conceptualisation: Jugsharan Singh Virdi; methodology: Nambram Somendro Singh, Neelja Singhal; formal analysis and investigation: Nambram Somendro Singh, Neelja Singhal, Manish Kumar; writing – original draft preparation: Nambram Somendro Singh, Neelja Singhal; writing – review and editing: Neelja Singhal, Manish Kumar; funding acquisition: Jugsharan Singh Virdi; resources: Jugsharan Singh Virdi; supervision: Neelja Singhal, Jugsharan Singh Virdi. All authors contributed to the study conception and design. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest

None.

Data availability statement

Not applicable.

References

Berthe, T et al. (2013) Evidence for coexistence of distinct Escherichia coli populations in various aquatic environments and their survival in estuary water. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 79, 46844693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alm, EW et al. (2014) Patterns and persistence of antibiotic resistance in faecal indicator bacteria from freshwater recreational beaches. Journal of Applied Microbiology 117, 273285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prestinaci, F, Pezzotti, P and Pantosti, A (2015) Antimicrobial resistance: a global multifaceted phenomenon. Pathogens and Global Health 109, 309318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allcock, S et al. (2017) Antimicrobial resistance in human populations: challenges and opportunities. Global Health, Epidemiology and Genomics 2, e4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruiz, J (2003) Mechanisms of resistance to quinolones: target alterations, decreased accumulation and DNA gyrase protection. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 51, 11091117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodríguez-Martínez, JM et al. (2011) Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance: an update. Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy 17, 149182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Awad, A, Arafat, N and Elhadidy, M (2016) Genetic elements associated with antimicrobial resistance among avian pathogenic Escherichia coli. Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials 15, 59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, X et al. (1997) DNA topoisomerase targets of the fluoroquinolones: a strategy for avoiding bacterial resistance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 94, 1399113996.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacoby, GA, Strahilevitz, J and Hooper, DC (2014) Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance. Microbiology Spectrum 2, 141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poirel, L et al. (2006) Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinant qnrS in Enterobacter cloacae. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 12, 10211023.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruiz, E et al. (2012) qnr, aac(6)-Ib-cr and qepA genes in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp.: genetic environments and plasmid and chromosomal location. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 67, 886897.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karah, N et al. (2010) Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinants qnr and aac(6′)-Ib-cr in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. from Norway and Sweden. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 66, 425431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mendonça, N et al. (2012) Association of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance and virulence markers in Escherichia coli isolated from water. Journal of Water and Health 10, 288294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varela, AR et al. (2015) Genetic characterization of fluoroquinolone resistant Escherichia coli from urban streams and municipal and hospital effluents. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 91, fiv015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conte, D et al. (2017) Characterization of CTX-M enzymes, quinolone resistance determinants, and antimicrobial residues from hospital sewage, wastewater treatment plant, and river water. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 136, 6269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffey, RH et al. (1999) Determinants of aminoglycoside-binding specificity for rRNA by using mass spectrometry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 96, 1012910133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sáenz, Y et al. (2004) Mechanisms of resistance in multiple-antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli strains of human, animal, and food origins. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 48, 39964001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ho, PL et al. (2010) Genetic identity of aminoglycoside-resistance genes in Escherichia coli isolates from human and animal sources. Journal of Medical Microbiology 59, 702707.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dhanji, H et al. (2011) Variation in the genetic environments of bla(CTX-M-15) in Escherichia coli from the faeces of travellers returning to the United Kingdom. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 66, 10051012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bajaj, P et al. (2016) Quinolone co-resistance in ESBL- or AmpC-producing Escherichia coli from an Indian urban aquatic environment and their public health implications. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 23, 19541959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, NS, Singhal, N and Virdi, JS (2018) Genetic environment of bla TEM-1, bla CTX-M-15, bla CMY-42 and characterization of integrons of Escherichia coli isolated from an Indian urban aquatic environment. Frontiers in Microbiology 9, 382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaushik, M et al. (2019) High prevalence of antibiotic resistance and integrons in Escherichia coli isolated from urban river water, India. Microbial Drug Resistance 25, 359370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Divya, SP and Hatha, AAM (2019) Screening of tropical estuarine water in south-west coast of India reveals emergence of ARGs-harboring hypervirulent Escherichia coli of global significance. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 222, 235248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singhal, N et al. (2019a) Evaluation of bile salt hydrolases, cholesterol-lowering capabilities and probiotic potential of Enterococcus faecium isolated from rhizosphere. Frontiers in Microbiology 10, 1567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalasseril, SG et al. (2020) Detection of New Delhi Metallo-β-lactamase 1 and cephalosporin resistance genes among carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in water bodies adjacent to hospitals in India. Current Microbiology 77, 28862895.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sapkota, AR et al. (2007) Antibiotic-resistant enterococci and fecal indicators in surface water and groundwater impacted by a concentrated swine feeding operation. Environmental Health Perspectives 115, 10401045.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baquero, F, Martinez, JL and Canton, JR (2008) Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance in water environments. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 19, 260265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martinez, JL (2009) Environmental pollution by antibiotics and by antibiotic resistance determinants. Environmental Pollution 157, 28932902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tacão, M, Correia, A and Henriques, I (2012) Resistance to broad-spectrum antibiotics in aquatic systems: anthropogenic activities modulate the dissemination of bla(CTX-M)-like genes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 78, 41344140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diwan, V et al. (2012) Identification of extended-spectrum β-lactamase and quinolone resistance genes in Escherichia coli isolated from hospital wastewater from central India. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 67, 857859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bajaj, P et al. (2015) Distribution and molecular characterization of genes encoding CTX-M and AmpC beta-lactamases in Escherichia coli isolated from an Indian urban aquatic environment. Science of the Total Environment 505, 350356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clermont, O, Bonacorsi, S and Bingen, E (2000) Rapid and simple determination of the Escherichia coli phylogenetic group. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 66, 45554558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2018) Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Approved Standard – 28th ed. M100. Wayne, PA, USA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Baño, J et al. (2004) Epidemiology and clinical features of infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in non-hospitalized patients. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 42, 10891094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singhal, N et al. (2019b) Virulence-associated traits and in vitro biofilm-forming ability of Escherichia coli isolated from a major river traversing Northern India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26, 2130421311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamane, K et al. (2007) 16S rRNA methylase-producing, gram-negative pathogens, Japan. Emerging Infectious Diseases 13, 642646.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cattoir, V, Poirel, L and Nordmann, P (2008) Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance pump QepA2 in an Escherichia coli isolate from France. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 52, 38013804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poirel, L, Cattoir, V and Nordmann, P (2012) Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance; interactions between human, animal, and environmental ecologies. Frontiers in Microbiology 3, 24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bönemann, G et al. (2006) Mobilizable IncQ-related plasmid carrying a new quinolone resistance gene, qnrS2, isolated from the bacterial community of a wastewater treatment plant. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 50, 30753080.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodriguez-Mozaz, S et al. (2015) Occurrence of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in hospital and urban wastewaters and their impact on the receiving river. Water Research 69, 234242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strahilevitz, J et al. (2009) Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance: a multifaceted threat. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 22, 664689.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poirel, L et al. (2005) Association of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase VEB-1. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 49, 30913094.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hara, H et al. (2019) Molecular characterization of multi-drug resistant Escherichia coli isolates from tropical environments in Southeast Asia. Journal of General and Applied Microbiology 64, 284292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maloo, A et al. (2017) Pathogenic multiple antimicrobial resistant Escherichia coli serotypes in recreational waters of Mumbai, India: a potential public health risk. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 24, 1150411517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wangkheimayum, J et al. (2017) Occurrence of acquired 16S rRNA methyltransferase-mediated aminoglycoside resistance in clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae within a tertiary referral hospital of northeast India. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 61, 17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zurfluh, K et al. (2017) Wastewater is a reservoir for clinically relevant carbapenemase- and 16s rRNA methylase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 50, 436440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gutierrez, B et al. (2012) Fitness cost and interference of Arm/Rmt aminoglycoside resistance with the RsmF housekeeping methyltransferases. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 56, 23352341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lioy, VS et al. (2014) Aminoglycoside resistance 16S rRNA methyltransferases block endogenous methylation, affect translation efficiency and fitness of the host. RNA 20, 382391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poirel, L et al. 2018) Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli. Microbiology Spectrum 6, 127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adefisoye, MA and Okoh, AI (2006) Identification and antimicrobial resistance prevalence of pathogenic Escherichia coli strains from treated wastewater effluents in Eastern Cape, South Africa. MicrobiologyOpen 5, 143151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramirez, MS and Tolmasky, ME (2010) Aminoglycoside modifying enzymes. Drug Resistance Updates 13, 151171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xia, R, Ren, Y and Xu, H (2013) Identification of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance qnr genes in multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria from hospital wastewaters and receiving waters in the Jinan area, China. Microbial Drug Resistance 19, 446456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laroche-Ajzenberg, E (2015) Conjugative multiple-antibiotic resistance plasmids in Escherichia coli isolated from environmental waters contaminated by human faecal wastes. Journal of Applied Microbiology 118, 399411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sunde, M and Norstrom, M (2005) The genetic background for streptomycin resistance in Escherichia coli influences the distribution of MICs. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 56, 8790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, M et al. (2009) New plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance gene, qnrC, found in a clinical isolate of Proteus mirabilis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 53, 18921897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavaco, LM et al. (2009) qnrD, a novel gene conferring transferable quinolone resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Kentucky and Bovismorbificans strains of human origin. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 53, 603608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, X et al. (2012) Prevalence of qnr, aac(6)-Ib-cr, qepA, and oqxAB in Escherichia coli isolates from humans, animals, and the environment. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 56, 34233427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Details of primers and PCR conditions used for analyses of plasmid-associated quinolone and aminoglycoside resistance genes, and genetic environment of qnrS in E. coli isolated from a major urban river of India

Figure 1

Table 2. Resistance phenotypes and plasmid-associated genes encoding flouro(quinolone) and aminoglycoside resistance in E. coli strains isolated from a major urban river of India