Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T11:30:18.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Physical and emotional periodicity in women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

R. A. McCance
Affiliation:
From the Biochemical Laboratory, King's College Hospital, London
M. C. Luff
Affiliation:
From the Biochemical Laboratory, King's College Hospital, London
E. E. Widdowson
Affiliation:
From the Biochemical Laboratory, King's College Hospital, London
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The day-to-day records over a period of 4–6 months of 167 normal women's physical changes and subjective phenomena have been collected by a new method. These women submitted data from 780 complete menstrual cycles. In addition, a smaller group submitted data which have been used for physical changes only. One woman's individual record of certain phenomena was obtained over a period of 8 years.

2. The average length of the menstrual cycle was 27·8 days with a standard deviation of 3·4 days. Some individual's cycles were characteristically short or long, regular or irregular. No woman menstruated with complete regularity (measured in days) over a period of 6 months. Twenty-three per cent of the menstrual periods began between 7.30 and 9.30 a.m., and the average duration of the flow was about 4·5 days.

3. Records from one case of intermenstrual, probably ovulatory, bleeding were obtained over a period of 6 months (Chart 2).

4. The periodicity of each subjective phenomenon as shown by the combined results has been recorded graphically, and these figures themselves constitute a summary of the results. Thus for fatigue, abdominal pain, backache, headache, breast changes, sexual feeling and intercourse, depression, elation, tendency to cry, irritability, intellectual capacity and tension see Figs. 5–19. Individual data of interest have been discussed in the light of the combined results.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1937

References

Allen, E. (1935). J. Amer. Med. Ass. 104, 1901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, J. & Hartman, C. G. (1935). Amer. J. Obstet. Gyn. 29, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartelmez, G. W. (1937). Physiol. Rev. 17, 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billings, E. G. (1934). Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp. 54, 440.Google Scholar
Bolaffio, M. (1932). Zbl. Gynäk. 56, 1510.Google Scholar
Chadwick, M. (1932). The Psychological Effects of Menstruation. Nervous and Mental Monog. Ser. No. 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotte, G. (1931). Rev. franç. gynéc. d'obstet. 26, 129.Google Scholar
Croom, J. H. (1896). Trans. Edinb. Obstet. Soc. 21, 26.Google Scholar
Davis, K. B. (1929). Factors in the Sex Life of 2200 Women. New York and London: Harper.Google Scholar
Eberhart, F. (1932). Med. Welt. 6, 266.Google Scholar
Fishbauch, E. C. (1927). Endocrinol. 11, 445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1932). Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Fluhmann, C. F. (1934). Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 27, 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freund, A. (1930). Psychol. Forschung. 13, 198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldschmidt, T. (1934). J. Abnorm. Social Psychol. 29, 218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajek, O. (1933). Zbl. Gynäk. 57, 257.Google Scholar
Hamilton, G. V. (1929). A Research in Marriage. New York: A. and C. Boni.Google Scholar
Hartman, C. G. (1929). J. Amer. Med. Assoc. 92, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, C. G. (1936). Time of Ovulation in Women; A Study of the Fertile Period in the Menstrual Cycle. London: Baillière, Tindall and Cox.Google Scholar
Hirschmann-Wertheimer, I. (1927). Monatschr. Psychiat. Neurol. 66, 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoff, F. (1936). Klin. Woch. 15, 570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubert, R. (1934). Arch. Gynäk. 158, 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G. B. (1932). J. Comp. Psychol. 13, 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J. L. (1933). Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 25, 583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirihara, H. (1932). Rep. Inst. Sci. Lab. Kurasiki, Japan, No. 14.Google Scholar
Knaus, H. (1934). Periodic Fertility and Sterility in Women in Germany. Vienna: Mandrich.Google Scholar
Kosakae, J. et al. (1933). Japan. J. Obstet. Gynec. 16, 141.Google Scholar
Marshall, F. H. A. (1922). The Physiology of Reproduction p. 61. London: Longmans Green.Google Scholar
Martin, C. L. (1930). Amer. J. Roentgenol. 24, 267.Google Scholar
Mayer, A. (1935). München. med. Woch. 82, 373.Google Scholar
Medical Women's Federation (1930). Lancet, ii, 57.Google Scholar
Moore, L. M. & Barker, J. L. (1923). Amer. J. Physiol. 64, 405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, W. H. (1936). Recent Advances in Physiology p. 203. London: J. and A. Churchill, Ltd.Google Scholar
Ogino, K. (1932). Zbl. Gynäk. 56, 721.Google Scholar
Pallot, G. (1935). Bull. d'Histol. Appl. 12, 378.Google Scholar
Papanicolaou, G. N. (1933). Amer. J. Anat. 52, 519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkes, A. S. (1931). Brit. Med. J. ii, 559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peller, S. (1935). Wien. med. Woch. 85, 175, 205.Google Scholar
Priestley, W. O. (1872). Brit. Med. J. ii, 431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, O. W. (1935). Amer. J. Med. Sci. 190, 641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, M. E. & Evans, H. M. (1928). Science, 68, 453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sowton, S. C. M. & Myers, C. S. (1928). Ind. Fat. Res. Board Rep. No. 45. London: H.M. Sta. Off.Google Scholar
Steiner, M. (1926). Deuts. med. Woch. 52, 2120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stopes, M. (1931). Married Love p. 43. London: Putnams.Google Scholar
Strachan, G. I. & Skottowe, I. (19311932). Trans. Edinb. Obstet. Soc. 52, 77.Google Scholar
Strachan, G. I. & Skottowe, I. (1933). Lancet, i, 1058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, A. P. (1932). Lancet, ii, 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckermann, S. (1936). Eugenics Rev. 28, 37.Google Scholar