Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:01:13.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Production of Antitoxin by the Injection of Filtrates of Cultures of Non-virulent Diphtheria Bacilli

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. A. Arkwright
J. A. Arkwright
Affiliation:
(From the Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine.)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We are still in doubt regarding the exact position of those bacilli which, morphologically and culturally, appear to be identical with the Klebs-Loeffler bacillus but which differ from it only in the absence of specific pathogenic power for laboratory animals. Most writers regard such non-virulent strains as true diphtheria bacilli which have lost their virulence and toxigenic power either temporarily or permanently. Others however are inclined to place them in a group allied to that of the genuine Klebs-Loeffler bacillus and express doubts as to whether they at any time possessed a claim to pathological significance (Graham Smith, 1904).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , December 1909 , pp. 409 - 411
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1909

References

REFERENCES

Arkwright, J. A. (1908). Observations on the Bacteriology of an Epidemic of Diphtheria in a School. Journ. of Hygiene, Vol. VIII. p. 48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham-Smith, G. S. (1904). A study of the virulence of Diphtheria bacilli isolated from 113 persons, etc. Journ. of Hygiene, Vol. IV. p. 258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrie, G. F. (1905). On the relationship of the Pseudo-diphtheria to the Diphtheria bacillus. Journ. of Hygiene, Vol. V. p. 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar