Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:00:41.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on the occurrence of Salmonella cholerae-suis and other salmonellas in two herds of feeder pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2010

D. R. Williams ,
D. Hunter ,
Jeannette Binder  and
Elaine Hough
D. R. Williams
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Agricultural Development and Advisory Service, Quarry Dene, Weetwood Lane, Leeds LS16 8HQ
D. Hunter
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Agricultural Development and Advisory Service, Quarry Dene, Weetwood Lane, Leeds LS16 8HQ
Jeannette Binder
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Agricultural Development and Advisory Service, Quarry Dene, Weetwood Lane, Leeds LS16 8HQ
Elaine Hough
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Agricultural Development and Advisory Service, Quarry Dene, Weetwood Lane, Leeds LS16 8HQ
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Modified brilliant green agar (BGA), Muller-Kauffmann tetrathionate, Rappaport's and selenite F broths were compared for their efficiency in isolating salmonellas from pigs and their excreta. It was concluded that BGA and Rappaport's broth were the media of choice. Where searches were made for Salmonella choleraesuis alone, the use of a trehalose McConkey agar provided a rapid method of differentiating S. cholerae-suis, which does not ferment trehalose, from the majority of other salmonellas, which do ferment trehalose.

Casualties were collected from two farms where infection with S. cholerae-suis was endemic. The isolation rates of S. cholerae-suis from different carcase sites were compared in order to determine the relative importance of the salivary, upper respiratory and faecal routes of excretion. S. cholerae-suis was isolated from numerous carcase sites in carriers including the salivary glands, tonsils, trachea and lungs. However, isolations from the nasal passages, mouth, pharynx and gastro-intestinal tract of carriers were either infrequent or absent. When, in a further study, S. cholerae-suis was isolated from only 3/414 faeces, 1/170 nasal swabs and not at all from 170 oral swabs taken from live pigs, it was concluded that there must be more significant modes of transmission than from the salivary glands, upper respiratory or gastro-intestinal tracts. Cannibalism was considered to be a possibility.

In contrast to S. cholerae-suis, other salmonellas were frequently isolated from randomly collected faeces and from the gastro-intestinal tract as well as other sites in casualties.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 86 , Issue 3 , June 1981 , pp. 369 - 377
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

References

REFERENCES

Harvey, R. W. S., Price, T. H. & Morgan, J. (1977). Salmonella surveillance with reference to pigs – Cardiff abattoir 1968–1975. Journal of Hygiene 78, 439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heard, T. W., Jenkett, N. E. & Linton, A. H. (1969). The incidence of Salmonella excretion in various pig populations from 1966 to 1968. British Veterinary Journal 125, 635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jameson, J. E. & Emberley, N. W. (1956). A substitute for bile salts in culture media. Journal of General Microbiology 15, 198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCaughey, W. J., McClelland, T. G. & Roddy, R. M. (1973). Salmonella isolations in pigs. Veterinary Record 92, 191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rappaport, F., Konforti, N. & Navon, B. (1956). A new enrichment medium for certain salmonellae. Journal of Clinical Pathology 9, 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, A. & Fawcett, A. R. (1973). Salmonella dublin infection of calves: the value of rectal swabs in diagnosis and epidemiological studies. British Veterinary Journal 129, 151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, A. J. (1971). Bacteria and disease of the biliary tract. Gut 12, 487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, H. W. (1952). The evaluation of culture media for the isolation of salmonellae from faeces. Journal of Hygiene 50, 21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sojka, W. J. & Field, H. I. (1970). Salmonellosis in England and Wales 1958–1967. Veterinary Buletin, Weybridge 40, 515.Google Scholar
Sojka, W. J., Wray, C., Shreeve, J. & Benson, A. J. (1977). Incidence of salmonella infection in animals in England and Wales 1968–1974. Journal of Hygiene 78, 43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tannock, G. W. & Smith, J. M. B. (1971). A salmonella carrier state involving the upper respiratory tract of mice. Journal of Infectious Diseases 123, 502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, P. (1977). Salmonella cholerae-suis infection in pigs with special reference to England and Wales. Veterinary Bulletin, Weybridge 47, 731.Google Scholar