Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:59:53.525Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Necrobacillosis and immunity in mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

G. R. Smith ,
L. M. Wallace  and
D. Till
G. R. Smith
Affiliation:
Nuffield Laboratories of Comparative Medicine, Institute of Zoology, The Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY
L. M. Wallace
Affiliation:
Nuffield Laboratories of Comparative Medicine, Institute of Zoology, The Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY
D. Till
Affiliation:
Nuffield Laboratories of Comparative Medicine, Institute of Zoology, The Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The study arose from the recent finding that sub-lethal numbers of certain bacterial species greatly enhanced the infectivity of Fusobacterium necrophorum.

A severe F. necrophorum infection in mice, cured with metronidazole, produced significant though slight resistance, which was demonstrable by challenge with a minute dose of F. necrophorum (< 20 organisms) suspended in a sub-lethal dose of Escherichia coli (300 × 10 organisms) to enhance fusobacterial infectivity. In an earlier comparable experiment, challenge with F. necrophorum alone, in necessarily large doses (≥3 × lO organisms), failed to demonstrate that a single cured fusobacterial infection gave rise to resistance; such an infection neither protected against the fatal necrobacillosis produced by challenge nor prolonged survival.

A sub-lethal E. coli infection was also shown by challenge with a minute dose of F. necrophorum (< 10 organisms), suspended in a sub-lethal dose of E. coli (152 × 10 organisms), to produce significant though slight protection against necrobacillosis.

The degrees of resistance demonstrated were too slight to give any encouragement to the prospect of an effective necrobacillosis vaccine.

Type
Special Article
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 103 , Issue 1 , August 1989 , pp. 211 - 215
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

References

REFERENCES

1.Smith, GR, Turner, A, Murray, LG, Oliphant, JC. The weak immunogenicity of Fusobacterium necrophorum. J Hyg 1985; 95: 59–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Smith, GR, Till, D, Wallace, LM, Noakes, DE. Enhancement of the infectivity of Fusobacterium necrophorum by other bacteria. Epidemiol Infect 1989; 103: 447–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Smith, GR, Oliphant, JC, Parsons, R.The pathogenic properties of Fusobacterium and Bacteroides species from wallabies and other sources. J Hyg 1984; 92: 165–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Deacon, AG, Duerden, BI, Holbrook, WP. Gas-liquid chromatographic analysis of metabolic products in the identification of Bacteroidaceae of clinical interest. J Med Microbiol 1978; 11: 81–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Wilson, GS, Miles, AA. In: Topley and Wilson's principles of bacteriology, virology and immunity. 6th ed.London: Edward Arnold 1975; 2: 1655–6.Google Scholar