Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:04:24.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Molecular epidemiology of Staphyloccocus aureus colonization in the Old Order of Amish of Lancaster county, Pennsylvania, USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2013

M.-C. ROGHMANN*
Affiliation:
University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD, USA
N. LONGINAKER
Affiliation:
University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
L. CROFT
Affiliation:
University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
J. K. JOHNSON
Affiliation:
University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
A. D. LYDECKER
Affiliation:
University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
O. C. STINE
Affiliation:
University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
*
*Author for correspondence: Dr M.-C. Roghmann, MD, MS, 685 W. Baltimore St, MSTF 3-36, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. (Email: [email protected])
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Transmission of Staphylococcus aureus colonization in community-based populations is not well understood. We sought to describe the molecular epidemiology of S. aureus colonization in the Old Order Amish. The study was a prospective, observational study of healthy adults and their same-sex siblings who were cultured from the anterior nares twice. S. aureus isolates were characterized using spa typing. Overall, 40% (159/398) of the study population was colonized with S. aureus. There were 84 spa types with the most abundant spa types being t012 (13%) and t021 (7%). There was no clustering of spa types within sibling groups; however, there was clustering within households. There were 111 S. aureus-colonized participant pairs living within the same household. Of these, 47% had concordant spa types. The diversity of spa types across a relatively isolated, genetically homogenous population with a similar lifestyle is striking. Taken together this suggests that S. aureus transmission is a local phenomenon limited to very close contact.

Type
Original Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

INTRODUCTION

Staphylococcus aureus is an opportunistic bacterial pathogen and a common cause of both community-acquired and hospital-acquired infections. Colonization plays a key role in development of S. aureus infections. Nasal colonization with S. aureus is common and most often precedes S. aureus infection. Rates of infection are threefold higher in nasal carriers [Reference Wertheim1]. Colonized individuals also serve as a source of transmission to others.

Nasal colonization can therefore be looked at as a reservoir for S. aureus that exists within the community. It is estimated that 29% of adults in the USA are colonized with S. aureus with 1·5% carrying methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) [Reference Gorwitz2]. S. aureus colonization status is influenced by multiple factors including host factors such as age, sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, antibiotic use, and underlying diseases such as upper respiratory inflammation affect colonization [Reference Wertheim3, Reference Kuehnert4]. Environmental factors such as exposure to a heavily colonized individual in the household or hospital affect transmission of S. aureus to others; however, the transmission of S. aureus in community-based populations is not well understood.

In a familial aggregation study, we recently reported that host genetic factors are not a strong determinant of persistent S. aureus colonization in the Old Order Amish of Lancaster county Pennsylvania [Reference Roghmann5]. The Old Order Amish live in a rural, community-oriented environment with uniform socioeconomic status and lifestyle. In general, they are not socially integrated with the non-Amish population. Our earlier finding implies that other factors determine S. aureus colonization. The objective of this analysis was to describe the molecular epidemiology of S. aureus colonization in this unique community-based population in order to determine risk factors for colonization and transmission based on colonization with matching genotypes.

METHODS

Clinical protocol methods

This study population was derived from a prospective, observational study of healthy, Old Order Amish adults and their same-sex siblings [Reference Roghmann5]. The protocol was approved by the University of Maryland, Baltimore IRB. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Briefly, we started by recruiting a convenience sample of healthy, Old Order Amish adults (n = 166) and then recruited their siblings who lived in different households and were of the same sex. We did not systematically sample household members of this cohort; household members were included when eligible for the original study population and most often were spouses. All recruitment was performed between March 2008 and October 2009. A different street address was required for each same-sex sibling. Individuals were not eligible for the study if they were aged <18 years, had active skin conditions, diabetes, end-stage renal disease, or had taken antibiotics in the last 30 days. Demographic and risk-factor information was obtained by interviewing study participants.

Specimen collection and microbiology methods

A trained research nurse obtained two cultures of the anterior nares from each participant. Swabs were aseptically inserted into the front of the nostril and rotated twice. Using the same swab, the process was repeated in the other nostril. Two cultures were obtained between 1 and 6 weeks apart. All samples were tested for S. aureus by use of standard microbiological procedures [Reference Furuno6]. Participants with S. aureus from either the first or second culture were considered S. aureus colonized for the objective of this analysis.

Molecular typing

Each S. aureus isolate was characterized by use of DNA amplification and DNA sequencing of the protein A (spa) gene hypervariable region [Reference Harmsen7]. Spa-type data were then tested for clustering within the assigned groups using Ridom Staphtype software [Reference Grundmann, Hori and Tanner8Reference Strommenger11]. We limited the cost between different strains in a cluster to four to achieve a discriminatory index of 0·966 (95% CI 0·956–0·982) for spa type and 0·919 (95% CI 0·889–0·943) for clonal clusters using the Hunter–Gatson Discriminatory Index (HGDI) method [Reference Hunter and Gaston12, Reference Mellmann13].

Statistical methods

The association between S. aureus colonization and potential predictors was measured using the χ 2 test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and Student's t test for normally distributed continuous variables.

RESULTS

Epidemiology of S. aureus colonization

Overall, 40% (159/398) of the study population was S. aureus colonized (see Table 1); only two subjects had MRSA. The average age was 46 years and they were predominantly female (73%). More than half of participants reported routinely handling some type of animal (62%). Participants who were S. aureus colonized and those who were not colonized did not significantly differ in the routine handling of animals (P = 0·19). There were also no significant differences by colonization status in the type of animal handled (data not shown).

Table 1. Description of study population and characteristics associated with Staphylococcus aureus colonization in healthy, adult Old Order Amish in Lancaster county, PA, 2008–2009

Values given are mean±s.d. or n (%)

* Colonization status unknown for four study participants.

P values are from χ 2 test, Fisher's exact test, or t test as appropriate.

Status for routine handling of animals was unknown for one study participant.

Molecular epidemiology of S. aureus colonization

Overall, there was great variability in S. aureus strains found in the Old Order Amish population. Of the 159 colonized subjects, 99 were positive on both cultures. Eighty-three of these 99 had the same or a closely related spa type. Thus, we performed the remaining analysis using the last isolate collected from the first two cultures for each individual. There were a total of 159 isolates that clustered into 84 spa types of which 71 were previously known. The most abundant spa types were t012 and t021 at 13% and 7%, respectively. The 71 previously known spa types were grouped using BURP clustering in Ridom Staphtype software with the following results: five spa types were excluded from clustering because they had less than four repeats rendering them evolutionarily uninformative, 14 spa types were singletons (>4 differences between spa types in clonal complexes), and 52 spa types were clustered into 15 clonal complexes (see Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Diagram of relatedness of 71 spa types identified in 145 isolates from Old Order Amish individuals. Relatedness was calculated in BURP which uses cost differences of <4 to group spa types into clusters. The size of circle is proportional to the number of isolates with that spa type. The lines connect spa types with minimum cost. There are 15 clusters and 14 singletons represented as single dots. The spacing between clusters does not have any evolutionary bearing.

We grouped spa-type concordance according to household and sibling groups. In total, there were 111 pairs living within the same household that were S. aureus colonized on at least one culture. Of these, 47% had concordant spa types. There were 24 sibling groups from the familial aggregation study with two or more members colonized with S. aureus. These sibling groups lived in different households. Only one (4%) of these 24 sibling groups had concordant spa types, one-tenth of the concordance rate within households.

DISCUSSION

Studying S. aureus colonization in the Old Order Amish presents a unique opportunity because the population is socially isolated and homogenous in terms of genetic background and lifestyle, reducing the influence of confounding factors. In this setting, we did not identify any host-related risk factors for S. aureus colonization. Our molecular typing demonstrated that individuals with more than one positive culture were likely to have the same or related spa type. At the population level, there were 52 spa types which clustered into 15 clonal clusters. We found evidence for clustering in households, but not in siblings who lived in different households.

We did not see a higher risk of S. aureus colonization in men compared to women as others have reported [Reference Graham, Lin and Larson14, Reference Emonts15]. We did not detect a difference in S. aureus colonization by age [Reference Kuehnert4, Reference Graham, Lin and Larson14], and saw no association with animal handling. Our failure to detect a difference may reflect our relatively small sample size. In addition, our sampling framework was not designed to be representative of the Amish population as a whole and only included adults with no known risk factors for S. aureus colonization.

Our molecular typing results are consistent with other community-based studies. At the population level, there were 52 spa types which clustered into 15 clonal clusters; this is consistent with other community-based studies [Reference Kuehnert4, Reference Skramm, Moen and Bukholm16Reference Sangvik18]. The most common spa types, t012 and t021, are closely related with only one repeat difference and have been associated with multilocus sequence types 30 and 33. These spa types have been associated with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) colonization in other community-based samples [Reference Skramm, Moen and Bukholm16, Reference Sangvik18, Reference Olsen19]. We found very little t011 and t034 (one isolate each), spa types associated with multilocus sequence type 398, livestock-associated MRSA. We found evidence for clustering in households. This is also consistent with household transmission studies. Household transmission studies, which have focused mainly on MRSA, have shown that transmission from MRSA-colonized patients or healthcare workers occurs in 15–29% of household contacts [Reference Eveillard20, Reference Calfee21].

The main limitation of our study is that the data was collected as part of a familial aggregation study of healthy Old Order Amish adults. The relatively small study population was recruited as a convenience sample in sibling groups and the siblings were required to live in different households. Thus, we have little information about S. aureus colonization status of other household members that were not in the original study. We were also limited to the information that was collected during the primary study. Therefore we did not have detailed information on other environmental exposures.

Given our sampling framework, the diversity of spa types across a relatively socially isolated, genetically homogenous population with a similar lifestyle is even more striking. Taken together this suggests that S. aureus transmission is a local phenomenon limited to very close contact such as might be seen in a household, hospital or athletics field.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We gratefully acknowledge the support of Alan Shuldiner, MD, and Braxton Mitchell, PhD, as scientific advisers and the staff of the Amish Research Clinic for their critical role in data collection. N.L. was supported through the Meyerhoff Graduate Fellows Program during this research. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

References

REFERENCES

1.Wertheim, HF, et al. Risk and outcome of nosocomial Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in nasal carriers versus non-carriers. Lancet 2004; 364: 703705.Google Scholar
2.Gorwitz, RJ, et al. Changes in the prevalence of nasal colonization with Staphylococcus aureus in the United States, 2001–2004. Journal of Infectious Diseases 2008; 197: 12261234.Google Scholar
3.Wertheim, HF, et al. The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections. Lancet Infectious Diseases 2005; 5: 751762.Google Scholar
4.Kuehnert, MJ, et al. Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization in the United States, 2001–2002. Journal of Infectious Diseases 2006; 193: 172179.Google Scholar
5.Roghmann, MC, et al. Persistent Staphylococcus aureus colonization is not a strongly heritable trait in Amish families. PLoS ONE 2011; 6: e17368.Google Scholar
6.Furuno, JP, et al. Comparison of the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus acquisition among rehabilitation and nursing home residents. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 2011; 32: 244249.Google Scholar
7.Harmsen, D, et al. Typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a university hospital setting by using novel software for spa repeat determination and database management. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2003; 41: 54425448.Google Scholar
8.Grundmann, H, Hori, S, Tanner, G. Determining confidence intervals when measuring genetic diversity and the discriminatory abilities of typing methods for microorganisms. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2001; 39: 41904192.Google Scholar
9.Simpson, EH. Measurement of species diversity. Nature 1949; 163: 688.Google Scholar
10.Struelens, MJ. Consensus guidelines for appropriate use and evaluation of microbial epidemiologic typing systems. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 1996; 2: 211.Google Scholar
11.Strommenger, B, et al. Assignment of Staphylococcus isolates to groups by spa typing, SmaI macrorestriction analysis, and multilocus sequence typing. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2006; 44: 25332540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Hunter, PR, Gaston, MA. Numerical index of the discriminatory ability of typing systems: an application of Simpson's index of diversity. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1988; 26: 24652466.Google Scholar
13.Mellmann, A, et al. Based upon repeat pattern (BURP): an algorithm to characterize the long-term evolution of Staphylococcus aureus populations based on spa polymorphisms. BMC Microbiology 2007; 7: 98.Google Scholar
14.Graham, PL 3rd, Lin, SX, Larson, EL. A U.S. population-based survey of Staphylococcus aureus colonization. Annals of Internal Medicine 2006; 144: 318325.Google Scholar
15.Emonts, M, et al. Host polymorphisms in interleukin 4, complement factor H, and C-reactive protein associated with nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus and occurrence of boils. Journal of Infectious Diseases 2008; 197: 12441253.Google Scholar
16.Skramm, I, Moen, AE, Bukholm, G. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: frequency and molecular diversity in a randomly sampled Norwegian community population. Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica 2011; 119: 522528.Google Scholar
17.Bischoff, WE, et al. Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage in a student community: prevalence, clonal relationships, and risk factors. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 2004; 25: 485491.Google Scholar
18.Sangvik, M, et al. Age- and gender-associated Staphylococcus aureus spa types found among nasal carriers in a general population: the Tromso Staph and Skin Study. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2011; 49: 42134218.Google Scholar
19.Olsen, K, et al. Prevalence and population structure of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage in healthcare workers in a general population. The Tromso Staph and Skin Study. Epidemiology and Infection 2013; 141: 143152.Google Scholar
20.Eveillard, M, et al. Carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among hospital employees: prevalence, duration, and transmission to households. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 2004; 25: 114120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Calfee, DP, et al. Spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among household contacts of individuals with nosocomially acquired MRSA. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 2003; 24: 422426.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Description of study population and characteristics associated with Staphylococcus aureus colonization in healthy, adult Old Order Amish in Lancaster county, PA, 2008–2009

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Diagram of relatedness of 71 spa types identified in 145 isolates from Old Order Amish individuals. Relatedness was calculated in BURP which uses cost differences of <4 to group spa types into clusters. The size of circle is proportional to the number of isolates with that spa type. The lines connect spa types with minimum cost. There are 15 clusters and 14 singletons represented as single dots. The spacing between clusters does not have any evolutionary bearing.