Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T14:52:58.455Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Linear relationships in complement fixation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

F. Fulton  and
J. O. Almeida
F. Fulton
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
J. O. Almeida
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Over a certain range there is a linear relationship between the amount of complement required for 50 % lysis and the amounts of one of the variables in the primary reaction mixture of a complement-fixation test when the third variable is present in a quantity sufficient to allow maximum fixation.

If this linear relationship were maintained as the concentration of the selected variable is progressively reduced, there would also be a linear relationship between the logarithms of the amounts of complement fixed and the logarithms of the amounts of the selected variable; in this case, the line with logarithmic co-ordinates will necessarily have unit slope.

When the fixation of small amounts of complement by several virus systems is measured, an approximately linear relationship using logarithmic co-ordinates has been demonstrated, but in many cases the line does not have unit slope. In this range, therefore, there is not a linear relationship when arithmetic co-ordinates are used.

A new design for a complement-fixation test is proposed, using isohaemolytic curves.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 60 , Issue 1 , March 1962 , pp. 95 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

References

REFERENCES

Almeida, J. O. (1956). J. Immunol. 76, 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almeida, J. O. (1958). Rev. bras. Leprol. 26, 181.Google Scholar
Fulton, F. (1958). Advanc. Virus Res. 5, 247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulton, F. & Dumbell, K. R. (1949). J. gen. Microbiol. 3, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyle, L. (1945–1946). J. Hyg., Camb., 44, 170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maltaner, F. & Almeida, J. O. (1949). Blood, 4, 728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wadsworth, A. (1947). Standard Methods of the Division of Laboratories and Research of the New York State Department of Health, 3rd ed., p. 369. Baltimore: The Williams and Wilkins Company.Google Scholar
Wadsworth, A., Maltaner, F. & Maltaner, E. (1931). J. Immunol. 21, 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar