Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T21:55:05.356Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Influence of the Age of the Parent on the Vitality of the Child—a First Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

R. J Ewart
R. J Ewart
Affiliation:
(From the Statistical Laboratory of the Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine.)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The subject I propose to discuss in the present and subsequent papers is of importance in two ways. Popular traditions have frequently implied that the age at which a parent begets offspring is not without influence upon the characters of the latter, the prevailing belief being humorously portrayed in the late W. S. Gilbert's ballad “The Precocious Baby.” Again, recent thinkers, notably Professor Karl Pearson, have asserted that elder born children differ markedly in liability to certain diseases from their younger brethren. Were this view to be accepted it would be relevant to enquire whether the difference might not be a function of the age of the parents at the time of birth of the offspring or at least whether such difference might not play a part in bringing about this result. Assuming that any such effect could be demonstrated, it is plain that a valuable stimulus would be given to the study of physiological changes in the reproductive system within the fertile period. These are the immediately interesting aspects of the subject, but with them I am less directly concerned than withcertain secondary consequences.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , December 1914 , pp. 453 - 480
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1914

References

REFERENCES

Beeton, M., and Pearson, K. (1899). A First Study of the Inheritance of Longevity, etc. Proc. Roy. Soc. LXV. 290.Google Scholar
Beeton, M., and Pearson, K. (1902). Inheritance of the Duration of Life. Biometrika, I. 50.Google Scholar
Beeton, M., Yule, G.U., Pearson, K. (1899). A First Study of the Inheritance of Longevity. Journ. Inst. Actuaries, XXXV. 112.Google Scholar
Blakeman, J. (1905). On Tests for Linearity of Regression in Frequency Distributions. Biometrika, IV. 332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownlee, John (1913). Studies on the meaning and relationships of Birth and Death rates. Journal of Hygiene, XIII.Google Scholar
Chatham, S. (1888). On the relative ages of Husbands and Wives where marriages are fruitful. Journ. Inst. Act. XXVII. 57.Google Scholar
Ewart, R.J. (1912). The Influence of Parental Age at Birth of Offspring. Eugenics Review, III. 122.Google Scholar
Ewart, R.J. (1912). Time and the Second Generation. (Reprinted from Medical Officer, X., London.)Google Scholar
Ewart, R.J. (1913). The Influence of Parental Age at Birth of Offspring, on its susceptibility to the Zymotic Diseases. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. VI. (Epidemiological Section), p. 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gini, Corrado (1912). The Contributions of Dermography to Eugenics. Problems in Eugenics, II.Google Scholar
Goring, Charles (1913). The English Convict. (Wyman.)Google Scholar
Greenwood, M., and Yule, G.U. (1914). On the Determination of the Size of the Family and of the Distribution of Characters, etc. Journ. Roy. Statistical Soc. LXXVII. 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, G. Stanley (1904). Adolescence; its Psychology, etc. 2 vols. (Appleton), II. 243, etc.Google Scholar
Hamer, W.H. (1912). Health Report, London County Council, III. 6.Google Scholar
Hamer, W.H. (1913). Presidential Address. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. Epidemiological Section, p. 1.Google Scholar
Macaulay, T.B. (1912). Supposed Inferiority of First and Second Born Members of Families.—Statistical Fallacies. (Herald Press, Montreal.)Google Scholar
March, Lucien (1912). Statistique des Familles en 1906. (Statistique générale de la France.)Google Scholar
Marro, A. (1912). Influence de l'âge des Parents sur les Caractères Psycho-Physiques des Enfants. Problems in Eugenics, I. 100.Google Scholar
Pearson, K. (1912). A Correction to be made to the Correlation Ratio. Biometrika, VIII. 254.Google Scholar
Pearson, K. (1907). First Study of the Statistics of Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Dulau and Co.Google Scholar
Ploetz, A. (1913). Neo-Malthusianismus und Rassenhygiene. Arch. f. Rassen- u. Gesellschafts-Biologie, X. 162.Google Scholar
Weinberg, W. (1910). Die Rassenhygienische Bedeutung der Fruchtbarkeit. Arch. f. Rassen- u. Gesellschafts-Biologie, VII. 684.Google Scholar