Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T20:18:55.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Influence of the Age of the Parent at the Birth of Offspring on the Age at which they are attacked by some of the Zymotic Diseases, with special reference to the Epidemiology of Scarlet Fever

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

R. J. Ewart
Affiliation:
(From the Statistical Department of the Lister Institute.)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In a previous paper (1912) a rough analysis of certain statistical data was made which seemed to show that the age of the parent at the birth of the offspring was a factor in its susceptibility to the Zymotic Diseases.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1916

References

REFERENCES

Archibald, E. (19061907). Scarlet Fever in Relation to Milk Supplies. Public Health, London, XIX. 733737.Google Scholar
Armstrong, H. E. (18871888). Scarlet Fever from infected milk. San. Rec. London, n.s., X. 64.Google Scholar
Armstrong, H. E. (18881889). Scarlatina propagated by Milk. Public Health, London, 124 and 156.Google Scholar
Armstrong, H. E. (1892). Examples of Epidemics due to Milk. Practitioner, London, XLVIII. 230.Google Scholar
Arnold, , Miles, (1911). The relation of housing to the isolation of Scarlet Fever and to return cases. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. (Epidem. Sect.), V. 150.Google Scholar
Ashmead, A. S. (1891). Scarlet Fever in Japan. Med. Rec. N.Y. XXXIV. 358.Google Scholar
Bacon, C. G. (1891). Contagiousness and Incubation Period of Scarlet Fever. Journ. American Med. Ass. Chicago, XVII. 929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballard, E. (1887). On the Prevalence and Fatality of Scarlatina as Influenced by Sex, Age and Season. Trans. Epidem. Soc. N.S. VII. 183.Google Scholar
Baur, L. (1909). Données épidémiologiques actuelles sur la contagiosité de la Scarlatine. Ann. d' Hyg. Pub. Paris, 4 S. XI. 242250.Google Scholar
Beatty, J. (1905). The Epidemic of Scarlet Fever at Northampton. Lancet, London, I. 748.Google Scholar
Biss, H. E. J. (1901). The duration of Infection in Scarlet Fever. Brit. Med. Journ. London, I. 676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biss, H. E. J. (1906). Scarlet Fever, Mortality and Hospital Isolation. Lancet, London, II. 1685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blain, H. (1888). Scarlatina and the Cow. Lancet, London, I, 545.Google Scholar
Blyth, A. W. (1886). Scarlet Fever from the Cow. Brit. Med. Journ. I. 223.Google Scholar
Boyd, J. J. (19011902). Scarlet Fever in the County Borough of South Shields. Public Health, XIV. 473480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, J. J. (19031904). Observations on the incidence of Scarlet Fever in different districts of the same town. Public Health, XVI. 653675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownlee, J. (1902). Note regarding statistics of Scarlet Fever. Report of the City of Glasgow Fever Hospitals, p. 20.Google Scholar
Brownlee, J. (1904). Note on the absence of evidence of the spread of Scarlet Fever by Schools in Glasgow. Report of the City of Glasgow Fever Hospitals, p. 25.Google Scholar
Brownlee, J. (1909). Certain considerations on the causation and course of Epidemics. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. (Epidem. Sect.), II, Part II 253.Google Scholar
Butler, W. (1908). The intermittent infectiousness of Scarlet Fever. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. (Epidem. Sect.), II. 5988. Also Hospital, London, XIV. 555582.Google Scholar
SirCameron, C. A. (1908). On a local outbreak of Scarlet Fever. Presumably attributable to infected Milk. Lancet, II. 720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, A. K. (1894). Scarlatina and Scarlatinal Sore Throat. A Record of milk infection. Brit. Med. Journal, I. 426.Google Scholar
Chalmers, A. K.(1895). Return Cases of Scarlet Fever. Lancet, I. 15661571. Scarlet Fever Return Cases. County and Municipal Rec. II. 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, A. K.(1913). The House as a Contributory Factor in the Death Rate. Proc. Roy. Phil. Soc. Glasgow, 1–29 and Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. (Epidem. Sect.), VI. Part II. 171181.Google Scholar
Chapin, C. V. (1895). Certain points on the etiology and prevention of Scarlet Fever. Public Health, VIII. 59.Google Scholar
Copeman, S. M. (1893). On an Outbreak of Scarlatina at Bush Hill Park in the Enfield and Edmonton Urban Sanitary Districts. Rep. Med. Off. Local Gov. Board 1891–2, London, XXI. 6978.Google Scholar
Corfield, A. L. (1888). Scarlet Fever in Condensed Milk. St George's, Hanover Square. Brit. Med. Journ. II. 687.Google Scholar
Creighton, C. (1894). A History of Epidemics in Britain. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Davies, D. S. (1892). A Milk Outbreak of Scarlet Fever. Public Health, V. 363.Google Scholar
Dykes, A. L. (1914). A Note on the varying prevalence of Scarlet Fever in relation to meteorological conditions. Pub. Health, XXVII. 293295.Google Scholar
Ekholm, K. (1903). Zur Scharlachübertragung durch Milch. Zeitschr.f. klin. Med. XLIX. 9094.Google Scholar
Elderton, E. M. and Pearson, K. (1915). The Influence of Isolation on the Diphtheria Attack and Death Rates. Biometrika, X. 548569.Google Scholar
Evans, Arnold W. (1895). An outbreak of Scarlet Fever in Bradford due to infected milk. Public Health, VIII. 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewart, R. J. (1912). The Influence of Parental and Grandparental Age at Birth of Offspring on their Susceptibility to the Zymotic Diseases. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. (Epidem. Sect.), VI. 4963.Google Scholar
Fothergill, J. (1748). An Account of the Sore Throat attended with Ulcers, etc. London.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. G. (1896). Milk as an agency in the conveyance of disease. Med. Record, No. 4.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. G. (1896). Milk and Scarlet Fever. Medical Record, March 28th.Google Scholar
Freemantle, F. C. (1906). The value of isolation Hospitals. Public Health, XIX. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, J. H. (19081909). Two outbreaks of Scarlet Fever resulting from infected milk. Public Health, XXII. 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, M. (1913). The factors that determine the rise, spread and degree of severity of Epidemic Diseases. 18th Internal. Congress of Medicine, Sect. XVIII. 4972.Google Scholar
Habgood, W. (1907). A possible explanation of late return cases in Scarlet Fever. Brit. Med. Journ. II. 1909.Google Scholar
Haeser, J. (1882). Geschichte der epidemischen Krankheiten. Jena: G. Fischer.Google Scholar
Hall, H. O. (1899). The etiology of Scarlet Fever. Med. Record, No. 10.Google Scholar
Hamer, (1894). Report on an outbreak of Scarlet Fever in South London. Public Health, VI. 366–7.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alice (1905). Milk and Scarlatina. American Journ. Med. Sci. N.Y. N.S. CXXX. 879890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, T. (1895). Return Cases of Scarlet Fever. Lancet, II. 1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, M. and Beattie, R. M. (18921893). On the period of infectiousness in cases of Scarlet Fever. San. Journ. Glasgow, N.S. XVI. 365373.Google Scholar
Heiberg, P. (1910). Die Letalität des Scharlachfiebers in Dänemark während der Jahre 1850–1900. Zeitschr. f. Hygiene, 1910, LXVI. 294.Google Scholar
Higgins, T. S. (1912). The Bacillus diphtheriae in relation to “Return Cases” of Scarlet Fever. Public Health, XXV. 259.Google Scholar
Hill, B. (18901891). Milk Scarlatina. Public Health, London III. 487491.Google Scholar
Hill, B. (1891). Milk and Scarlet Fever. Brit. Med. Journ. II. 136.Google Scholar
Hirsch, E. (1881). Handbuch der Historisch-geographischen Pathologie, I. 122.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, O. R. (1911). An outbreak of Milk-borne Scarlet Fever. Public Health, XXIV. 143.Google Scholar
Jurgensen, T. (1909). Nothnagel's Encyclopedia of Practical Medicine. English Edition. Scarlet Fever, 379.Google Scholar
Kidd, H. C. (1905). A Note on Return Cases of Scarlet Fever of unusual causation. Lancet, I. 1645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kober, A. (1901). Milk and Scarlet Fever. American Journ. Med. Sci. CXXI. 552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koulakovski, Anna (1904). Beobachtungen über Scharlach. Zürich.Google Scholar
Lemoine, G. H. (1895). Contagiosité de la Scarlatine. Bul. et Mem. Soc. Med. d. Hop. de Paris, 3 s. XII. 738.Google Scholar
Longstaff, G. B. (18791880). On some statistical indications of a Relationship between Scarlatina; Puerperal Fever and certain other Diseases. Trans. Epidem. Soc. IV. 421.Google Scholar
McClure, W. St C. (1914). Hospital Isolation of Scarlet Fever. Public Health, XXVII. 304311.Google Scholar
Macdonald, David (19111912). Pigmentation of the hair and eyes of children suffering from acute fevers, etc. Biometrika, VIII. 1339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malit, H. (1895). Scarlet Fever in Wolverhampton. Results of Hospital Isolation. Public Health, VIII. 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayeda, M. Y. (1898). About Scarlet Fever in Japan. Pediatrics, N.Y. VI. 544546.Google Scholar
Millard, C. K. (1898). The etiology of return cases of Scarlet Fever. Brit. Med. Journ. II. 614, 618.Google Scholar
Millard, C. K. (19001901). The Influence of hospital isolation in Scarlet Fever; an appeal to statistics. Public Health, XIII. 462503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millard, C. K. (19011902). The Hospital isolation of Scarlet Fever, some points of uncertainty. Public Health, XIV. 285294 and Brit. Med. Journ. II. 821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, S. G. H. (1908). The infectivity of desquamation in Scarlet Fever. Public Health, XXI. 148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, A. C. (1892). On an outbreak of Scarlet Fever connected with an added disease of the cow. Public Health, V. 363.Google Scholar
SirMurphy, Shirley F. (1897). Seasonal Variations in Age distribution and fatality. Trans. Epidem. Soc. Lond. N.S. XVII. 116.Google Scholar
Murray, R. D. (1888). A case of sporadic Scarlet Fever originating “de Novo.” Lancet, II. 813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mussen, A. A. (19031904). Scarlatina and Milk Supply. Series of 59 cases due to infected milk. Public Health, XVI. 687689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neech, C. T. (1909). The consideration of certain factors which operate in the causation and spread of Scarlet Fever. Public Health, XXII. 297.Google Scholar
Neech, J. T. (1897). On the duration of the period of infectiousness in Scarlet Fever. Brit. Med. Journ. II. 765.Google Scholar
Newsholme, A. (19001901). The epidemiology of Scarlet Fever in relation to the utility of isolation hospitals. Trans. Epidem. Soc. London, N.S. XX. 4869.Google Scholar
Newsholme, A. (1901). The utility of Hospital isolation in diminishing the spread of Scarlet Fever, considered from an epidemiological standpoint. Journ. Hyg. I. 145152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newsholme, A. (19011902). On the notification of doubtful cases and the hospital isolation of Scarlet Fever and Diphtheria. Public Health, London, XIV.Google Scholar
Niven, J. (1896). Return Cases of Scarlet Fever. Lancet, II. 304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niven, J. (1908). Med. Officer, I. 201.Google Scholar
Parkes, L. C. (1892). At what stage is Scarlet Fever infectious? Brit. Med. Journ. II. 663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkes, L. C. (1903). The infectivity of the later stages of Scarlet Fever and Hospital Isolation. Practitioner, LXX. 552558.Google Scholar
Parsons, H. F. (1890). Report on an outbreak of Scarlet Fever with Associated Diphtheria and Sore Throat, occurring in the Macclesfield Urban and Sanitary Districts in connection with a particular supply of Milk. Report Med. Officer Local Gov. Board 1889. London, XIX. 99, 114.Google Scholar
Parsons, H. F. (1912). Report on Isolation Hospital. Annual Report Med. Officer Local Gov. Board, X. pp. 415, 106109.Google Scholar
Peters, B. A. (1914). The Elimination of cross infection in Fever Hospitals. Public Health, XXVII. 296298.Google Scholar
Pierce, R. W. C. (19081909). A mixed outbreak of Scarlet Fever and Diphtheria due to infected Milk. Public Health, London, XXII. 5659.Google Scholar
Power, W. H. (18861887). Memorandum on epidemic Scarlatina and Sore Throat in Wimbledon and Merton with an appended report. Rep. Med. Off. Local Gov. Board, XVI. 327338.Google Scholar
Preisich, K. (1909). Scharlachinfeotion durch geheilt entlassene Kranke— Angaben zür Epidemiologie des Scharlachs. Berl. klin. Wochenschr. XLVI. 1158.Google Scholar
Pritchard, E. (1891). Scarlet Fever and Milk Supplies. Brit. Med. Journ. II. 1179.Google Scholar
Ransome, A. (18701875). On the Relations between Diphtheria and Scarlet Fever. Trans. Epidem. Soc. Lond. III. 520.Google Scholar
Reber, A. (1901). Scharlach und Schule. Strassburg.Google Scholar
Return Cases of Scarlet Fever (1906). Brit. Med. Journ. II. 652.Google Scholar
Richter, P. (1908). Beiträge zur Geschichte des Scharlachs. Arch. f. Geschichte d. Med. I. 161.Google Scholar
Robertson, W. (1901). The new Type of Scarlet Fever from a Public Health point of view. Brit. Med. Journ. I. 822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, J. B. (1888). Scarlet Fever in relation to a Glasgow Milk Service. Lancet, II. 1079.Google Scholar
Russell, J. B. (1892). Scarlet Fever and Milk. Lancet, London, II. 723.Google Scholar
Smith, Tonoe W. (1883). The incubation period of Scarlet Fever. Brit. Med. Journ. p. 150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sörensen, O. M. (1906). [Scarlatina return cases.] Ted. Kbenh. 1906, XLV. reviewed in Therap. Monatschr. Berl. 1906, XX. pp. 111118.Google Scholar
Spear, J. (18801881). Rep. Proc. Northumb. and Durham Med. Soc. Newcastle-on-Tyne, 137145.Google Scholar
Spear, J. (1890). Report on an outbreak of Scarlet Fever in the Farringdon Rural Sanitary District and upon the Sanitary administration of that district. Rep. Med. Off. Local Gov. Board 1889. London, XIX. 8388.Google Scholar
Study of Infectious Diseases, The, (1914). Public Health, XXVIII. 287289.Google Scholar
Thompson, T. W. (1895). Considerations in respect to return cases of Scarlet Fever. Lancet, 12771281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, T. W. (1896). Report on the re-invasion by Scarlatina of households in which persons from the Bromley and Beckenham Joint Hospitals had returned on their recovery from that disease. Rep. Med. Off. Local Gov. Board 1894–5. London, XXIV. 103134.Google Scholar
Thorne, W. B. (1891). The prevention and treatment of Scarlet Fever. Lancet, I. 984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, B. (1904). Observations on an epidemic of Scarlet Fever. Brit. Med. Journ. 1420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tingrall, K. G. (1904). Eine durch Milch verursachte Scharlachepidemie. Hyg. Rundschau, Berlin, XIV. 109.Google Scholar
Turner, F. M. (19061907)., Return Cases of Scarlet Fever and Diphtheria notified in the three years 1902–4. Public Health, XIX. 30, 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogl, (1891). Scharlachepidemie in München im Jahre 1884–1885. Verhandl. d. x. internal. Med. Congr. 1890. Berlin, V. (18 Abt.), 177, 181.Google Scholar
Walford, E. (19031904). The Influence of Hospital Isolation upon Scarlet Fever in Cardiff. Public Health, XVI. 676686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, B. H. (1892). Early Infection of Scarlet Fever and Measles. Brit. Med. Journ. II. 664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, T. E. (1900). Prophylaxis in Scarlet Fever. Pediatrics, New York, 417.Google Scholar
Webb, V. G. (1896). Return Cases of Scarlet Fever. Two suggestions. Lancet, II. 843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, J. B. and May, H. (18921893). An Outbreak of Scarlet Fever in Handsworth and Aston due to infected milk. Public Health, V. 7678.Google Scholar
Westok, G. H. (1894). Spread of disease by infected milk. Brit. Med. Journ. II. 956 and 1408.Google Scholar
Wheatley, J. (19031904). The desirability of an enquiry into the effect of Hospital Isolation. Public Health, XVI. 355359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitelegge, A. (1887). Age, Sex and Season in Relation to Scarlet Fever. Trans. Epidem. Soc. N.S. VII. 153.Google Scholar
Wiglesworth, A. (1897). Isolation of Scarlet Fever unnecessary and inexpedient. Lancet, II. 10401043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willoughby, E. F. (18951896). Return cases of Scarlet Fever. San. Rec. London, n.p. XVII. 425.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. T. (1897). A Contribution to the Natural History of Scarlet Fever. Public Health, XI. 114.Google Scholar
Wright, W. (1907). The influence of school closure on the control of spread of infectious disease amongst children. Public Health, XIX. 23.Google Scholar
Young, M. (1904). Hospital Isolation of Scarlet Fever. The desirability of an inquiry into its effects. Med. Press and Circ. London, N.S. LXXVIII. 303.Google Scholar