Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:17:22.383Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of temperature on the behaviour of mixed bacterial contamination of the shell membrane of the hen's egg

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. Dolman  and
R. G. Board
J. Dolman
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, Avon BA2 7AY
R. G. Board
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, Avon BA2 7AY
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The inner membrane of the air cell of hens' eggs was inoculated with Pseudomonas putida, Staphylococcus xylosus, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli and Salmonella enteitidis.The first mentioned eventually dominated the contamination of the albumen of eggs stored at 4, 15, and 20 °C. The last mentioned did so in eggs stored at 37 °C. The interval between inoculation of the membrane and gross contamination of the albumen was markedly influenced by site of contamination relative to yolk movement.

Type
Research Article
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 108 , Issue 1 , February 1992 , pp. 115 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

References

REFERENCES

1.Anonymous. Salmonella in eggs. PHLS evidence to the Agriculture Committee. PHLS Microbiology Digest 1989; 6: 1–6.Google Scholar
2.St Louis, ME, Morse, DL, Potter, ME et al. , The emergence of grade A eggs as a major source of Salmonella enteritidis infections. JAMA 1988; 259: 2103–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Gordon, RF, Tucker, JF. The epizootiology of Salmonella menston infection of fowls and the effect of feeding poultry food artificially infected with Salmonella. Br Poult Sci 1965; 6: 251–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Humphrey, TJ, Baskerville, A, Mawer, S, Rowe, B, Hopper, S. Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4 from the contents of intact eggs: a study involving naturally infected hens. Epidemiol Infect 1989; 103: 415–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Gast, RK, Beard, CW. Production of Salmonella enteritidis contaminated eggs by experimentally infected hens. Avian Dis 1990; 34: 438–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Humphrey, TJ, Whitehead, A, Gawler, AHL, Henley, A, Rowe, B. Numbers of Salmonella enteritidis in the contents of naturally contaminated hens' eggs. Epidemiol Infect 1991; 106: 271–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Stokes, JL, Osborne, WW, Bayne, HG. Penetration and growth of Salmonella in shell eggs. Food Res 1956; 21: 510–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Sparks, NHC, Board, RG. Bacterial penetration of the recently oviposited shell of hen's eggs. J Hyg 1940; 40: 453–61.Google Scholar
9.Haines, RB, Moran, T. Porosity of, and bacterial invasion through the shell of the hen's egg. JHyg 1940; 40: 453–61.Google ScholarPubMed
10.Kim, CJ, Emery, DA, Rinke, H, Nagaraja, KV, Halvorson, DA. Effect of time and temperature on growth of Salmonelly enteritidis in experimentally inoculated eggs. Avian Dis 1989; 33: 735–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Clay, CE, Board, RG. Growth of Salmonella enteritidis in artificially contaminated hens' shell eggs. Epidemiol Infect 1991; 106: 271–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Miles, AA, Halnan, ET. A new species of microorganism (Proteus melonavogenes) causing black rot in eggs. J Hyg 1937; 37: 79–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Board, PA, Board, RG. A diagnostic key for identifying organisms recovered from rotten eggs. Br Poult Sci 1968; 9: 111–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Humphrey, TJ, Baskerville, Mawer, S, Rowe, B, Hopper, S. Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4 from the contents of intact eggs: a study involving naturally infected hens. Epidemiol Infect 1989; 103: 415–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Mead, GC, Adams, BW. A selective medium for the rapid isolation of pseudomonads associated with poultry meat spoilage. Br Poult Sci 1977; 18: 661–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Board, RG, Ayres, JC, Kraft, AA, Forsythe, RH. The microbiological contamination of eggs shells and egg packing materials. Br Poult Sci 1964; 43: 584–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Tranter, HS, Board, RG. The antimicrobial defence of avian eggs: Biological perspective and chemical basis. J Appl Biochem 1982; 4: 295–338.Google Scholar
18.Seviour, E, Board, RG. The behaviour of mixed bacterial infections in the shell membranes of the hen's egg. Br Poult Sci 1972; 13: 33–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Johns, CK, Bérard, HL. Further bacteriological studies relating to egg drying. Sci Agric 1945; 24: 551–65.Google Scholar