Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T19:22:50.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The immunizing potency of alcohol-killed and alcohol-preserved typhoid vaccine after storage for ten Years

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

A. Felix  and
E. S. Anderson
A. Felix
Affiliation:
From the Central Enteric Reference Laboratory and Bureau, Public Health Laboratory Service (Medical Research Council), London
E. S. Anderson
Affiliation:
From the Central Enteric Reference Laboratory and Bureau, Public Health Laboratory Service (Medical Research Council), London
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Alcohol-killed and alcohol-preserved typhoid vaccine retains its power of stimulating Vi- and O-antibody formation unimpaired during storage at 1–2° C. for at least 10 years.

2. The Vi antibody induced by immunization with the 10-year-old vaccine possesses full ‘functional efficacy’ in passive-immunity tests in mice.

3. The expiry date of this type of vaccine can be extended to a period of 10 years, provided the vaccine is kept in cold storage.

4. Alcoholized vaccine can serve as ‘standard vaccine’ in any future attempt at standardization of the potency of typhoid vaccine.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 49 , Issue 2-3 , June 1951 , pp. 288 - 298
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1951

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, E. S., Richards, H. G.H. (1948). J. Hyg., Camb. 46, 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craigie, J. & Felix, A. (1947). Lancet, 1, 823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felix, A. (1938). J. Hyg., Camb. 38, 750.Google Scholar
Felix, A. (1941). Brit. med. J. 1, 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felix, A. (1950). Bull. World Hlth Org. 2, 643.Google Scholar
Felix, A. (1951). J. Hyg., Camb. 49, 268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felix, A. & Anderson, E. S. (1951). J. Hyg., Camb. 49, 349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felix, A. & Beamaoar, S. S. (1935). Brit. J. exp. Path. 16, 422.Google Scholar
Felix, A. & Petrie, G. F. (1938). J. Hyg., Camb. 38, 673.Google Scholar
Felix, A., Rainsford, S. G. & Srokes, E. J. (1941). Brit. med. J. 1, 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, D. W., Amies, C. R. & Steabben, D. B. (1940). Ann. Rep. Lister Inst. Prev. Med., Lond., P.7.Google Scholar
Kauffmana, F. (1941). Acta path. microbiol. scand. 18, 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loureiro, J. A. M. De (1946). Cadernos Cientificos, Lisbon, 1, 201.Google Scholar
Mishulow, L., Mowry, I. & Stocker, A. K. (1937). J. infect. Dis. 60, 356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peluffo, C. A. (1941). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N.Y. 48, 340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, H. M., Findlay, H. T. & Bensted, H. J. (1934). J. R. Army med. Cps, 62, 161.Google Scholar
Rainsford, S. G. (1942). J. Hyg., Camb. 42, 297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION(1950). Tech. Rep. Ser. 2, 6.Google Scholar