Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:32:32.352Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Immunity to diphtheria in Siena

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 1997

R. GASPARINI
Affiliation:
Institute of Hygiene, University of Siena, Italy
T. POZZI
Affiliation:
Institute of Hygiene, University of Siena, Italy
E. FRAGAPANE
Affiliation:
Institute of Hygiene, University of Siena, Italy
R. SEVERINI
Affiliation:
Sclavo S.p.A., Siena, Italy
C. CELLESI
Affiliation:
Institute of Infectious Diseases, University of Siena, Italy
P. FABRIZI
Affiliation:
Sclavo Diagnostics, Siena, Italy
A. PROVVEDI
Affiliation:
Sclavo Diagnostics, Siena, Italy
M. BERGAMINI
Affiliation:
Institute of Infectious Diseases, University of Ferrara, Italy
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The aim of this study, carried out in 1993, was to evaluate diphtheria immunity in Siena. Diphtheria antitoxin levels were measured by means of the immunoenzymatic test (ELISA) in serum samples of 602 apparently healthy subjects (239 males and 363 females) of all ages residing in Siena. According to widely used criteria, 6% of the total population were susceptible to diphtheria (antibody levels <0·01 IU/ml), 71% had basic protection (0·01–0·09 IU/ml) and 23% were fully protected ([ges ]0·1 IU/ml). The results suggested that a high proportion of young population had a protective level of immunity against diphtheria, that susceptibility increased with age and a smaller proportion of males (2·9%) than females (8·3%) were unprotected; this difference was statistically significant. Our results suggest that it may be useful to revaccinate adults with low levels of diphtheria toxoid so that the percentage that remains unprotected does not put the community at risk of an outbreak of diphtheria.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1997 Cambridge University Press