Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T16:17:17.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The identification of Salmonella enteritidis-infected poultry flocks associated with an outbreak of human salmonellosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

A. W. van de Giessen
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Water and Food Microbiology
J. B. Dufrenne
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Water and Food Microbiology
W. S. Ritmeester
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Water and Food Microbiology
P. A. T. A. Berkers
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Water and Food Microbiology
W. J. van Leeuwen
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Bacteriology, National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands
S. H. W. Notermans
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Water and Food Microbiology
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the summer of 1991 a human outbreak of Salmonella enteritidis infection occurred following a barbecue in which about 100 persons were involved. Eggs, supplied by one or more of 10 different layer farms, were the most probable source of the infection. To identify the S. enteritidis-positive flocks, an immunoassay was used to detect salmonella serogroup D-specific antibodies in the yolk of hens eggs. Antibody titres in the eggs from two layer farms, farm A and B, clearly exceeded the titres found in randomly collected eggs. Further investigations on farm A and B yielded high antibody titres in the eggs from flocks A1, A2 and B2, and low titres in the eggs from flock B1. S. enteritidis was isolated from the faecal samples of flocks A1, A2 and B2, whereas no salmonella was detected in the faecal samples of flock B1. The flocks present on both farms originated from the same breeder flock.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

References

REFERENCES

1. Report of WHO on epidemiological emergency in poultry and egg salmonellosis. Geneva: WHO, 1989; report no WHO/CDS/VPH/89.82.Google Scholar
2.Rodrigue, DC, Tauxe, RV, Rowe, B. International increase of S. enteritidis: A new pandemic ? Epidemiol Infect 1990; 105: 21–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.St.Louis, ME, Morse, DL, Potter, ME, et al. The emergence of grade A eggs as a major source of Salmonella enteritidis infections. J Am Med Assoc 1988; 259: 2103–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Madden, JM. Salmonella enteritidis contamination of whole chicken eggs. Dairy Food Environ San 1990; 10: 268–70.Google Scholar
5. Anonymous. Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4: chicken and egg. Lancet 1988; ii: 720–2.Google Scholar
6.Cowden, JM, Lynch, D, Joseph, CA, et al. Case control study of infections with Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4 in England. Br Med J 1989; 299: 771–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Stevens, A, Joseph, C, Bruce, J, et al. A large outbreak of Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4 associated with eggs from overseas. Epidemiol Infect 1989; 103: 425–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Timothy, JF, Shivaprasad, HL, Baker, RC, Rowe, B. Egg transmission after infection of hens with Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4. Vet Rec 1989; 125: 600–1.Google Scholar
9.Protais, J, Lahellec, C. Transmission verticale des Salmonelles chez la poule: Exemple de Salmonella enteritidis. Sci Aliments 1989; 9: 4350.Google Scholar
10.Gast, RK, Beard, CW. Production of Salmonella enteritidis contaminated eggs by experimentally infected hens. Avian Dis 1990; 34: 438–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Humphrey, TJ, Baskerville, A, Mawer, S, Rowe, B, Hopper, S. Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4 from the contents of intact eggs: a study involving naturally infected hens. Epidemiol Infect 1989; 103: 415–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Humphrey, TJ. Numbers of Salmonella enteritidis in the contents of naturally contaminated hen's eggs. Epidemiol Infect 1991; 106: 489–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Paul, J, Batchelor, B. Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4 and hens' eggs. Lancet 1988; ii: 1421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Humphrey, TJ, Cruikshank, JG, Rowe, B. Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4 and hens' eggs. Lancet 1989; i: 281.Google Scholar
15.Edel, W. Salmonella onderzoek en in het bijzonder naar S. enteritidis bij Nederlands pluimvee. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd 1990; 115: 1005–8.Google Scholar
16.Notermans, S, Heuvelman, CJ. Immunological detection of moulds in food by using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA); preparation of antigens. Int J Food Microbiol 1985; 2: 247–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Westphal, O, Luderitz, O, Bister, F. Über die Extraction von Bakteriën mit Phenol/Wasser. Z Naturforschung 1952; 76: 148–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Van de Giessen, AW, Peters, R, Berkers, PATA, Jansen, WH, Notermans, SHW. Salmonella contamination of poultry flocks in the Netherlands. Vet Quart 1991; 13: 41–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Edel, W. Salmonella enteritidis bij pluimvee: bewaking en bestrijding 1990/1991. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd 1991; 116: 806–11.Google ScholarPubMed
20.Chart, H, Rowe, B, Baskerville, A, Humphrey, TJ. Serological analysis of chicken flocks for antibodies to Salmonella enteritidis. Vet Rec 1990; 127: 501–2.Google ScholarPubMed
21.McLeod, S, Barrow, PA. Lipopolysaccharide-specific IgG in egg yolk from two chicken flocks infected with Salmonella enteritidis. Lett Appl Microbiol 1991; 13: 294–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Nicholas, Raj, Andrews, SJ. Detection of antibody to Salmonella enteritidis and S. typhimurium in the yolk of hens' eggs. Vet Rec 1991; 128: 98100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Dadrast, H, Hesketh, R, Taylor, DJ. Egg yolk antibody detection in identification of salmonella infected poultry. Vet Rec 1990; 126: 219.Google ScholarPubMed