Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T16:05:06.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Genus Salmonella Lignières, 1900: Issued by the Salmonella Subcommittee of the Nomenclature Committee of the International Society for Microbiology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

At the First Congress of the International Society for Microbiology held in Paris in July 1930, a Nomenclature Committee of the Society was authorised and constituted by resolution in plenary session. Under article 4 section b of the resolutions concerning the formation of the committee, authority and encouragement were given for the monographing of special groups or genera of bacteria. In furtherance of this object a subcommittee was called together early in 1933 to consider the question of the taxonomy and nomenclature of the Salmonella group, Dr H. Schütze, Lister Institute, London, being appointed Chairman; the other members of the subcommittee comprising: Dr E. O. Jordan, University of Chicago, U.S.A.; Dr F. Kauffmann, Statens Serum-institut, Copenhagen, Denmark; Dr W. M. Scott, Ministry of Health, London; Mr P. Bruce White, National Institute for Medical Research, London; with Dr R. St John-Brooks, National Collection of Type Cultures (Medical Research Council), Lister Institute, London, as Secretary. The late Dr J. Lignières, some time before his lamented death, consented to serve on the subcommittee. As, however, he died before he had an opportunity of considering the draft report, which he did not take part in drawing up, his name does not appear as a member of the subcommittee.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , October 1934 , pp. 333 - 350
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1934

References

REFERENCES

Achard, and Bensaude, (1896). Soc. méd. des Hôp. de Paris, 3ds, 13, 679. (Ref. Kolle and Wassermann, 1913, Handbuch der pathogenen Mikroorganismen, 3.)Google Scholar
Andrewes, F. W. and Neave, S. (1921). Brit. J. Exp. Path. 2, 157.Google Scholar
Aoki, K. and Sakai, K. (1925). Zbl. Bakt. Abt. i, Orig. 95, 152.Google Scholar
Bahr, L. (1928). Dtsch. tierärztl. Wschr. 786. (Ref. Zbl. Bakt. Ref. i, 1929, 93, 407.)Google Scholar
Bahr, L. (1930). Dtsch. tierärztl. Wschr. 145.Google Scholar
Bahr, L. (1930 a). Dtsch. tierärztl. Wschr. 165. (Ref. Zbl. Bakt. Ref. i, 1930, 99, 265.)Google Scholar
Basenau, F. (1894). Arch. f. Hyg. 20, 242.Google Scholar
Bergey, D. H.et al. (1923). Manual of Determinative Bacteriology.Google Scholar
Bergey, D. H.et al. (1930). Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. 3rd ed.Google Scholar
Bergey, D. H.et al. (1934). Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. 4th ed.Google Scholar
Bernhardt, G. (1913). Z. Hyg. Infekt. Kr. 73, 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boecker, E. and Kauffmann, F. (1930). Zbl. Bakt. Abt. Orig. 116, 458.Google Scholar
Boycott, A. E. (1906). J. Hyg. 6, 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridges, R. F. and Scott, W. M. (1931). J. Roy. Army Med. Corps, 56, 241.Google Scholar
Brion, A. and Kayser, H. (1902). Münch. med. Wschr. 49, 611.Google Scholar
Brown, H. C., Duncan, J. T. and Henry, T. A. (1926). Lancet, 1, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, R. E. (1918). J. Bact. 3, 53.Google Scholar
Buchanan, R. E. (1925). General Systematic Bacteriology.Google Scholar
Castellani, A. and Chalmers, A. J. (1919). Manual of Tropical Medicine, 3rd ed.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chester, (1901). Manual of Determinative Bacteriology.Google Scholar
Cohn, F. (1875). Beitr. Biol. Pflanz. 8, 141. (Ref. Buchanan, 1925.)Google Scholar
Cornil, and Toupet, (1888). C.R. Acad. Sci. 106, 1747. (Ref. Zbl. Bakt. 1888, 4, 333.)Google Scholar
Dammann, and Stedefeder, (1910). Arch. f. wiss. u. prakt. Tierheilk. 36, 432. (Ref. Zbl. Bakt. Ref. i, 1911, 49, 139.)Google Scholar
De Nobele, (1899). Ann. de soc. de Gand. (1901). (Ref. Bergey et al. 1930, p. 343.)Google Scholar
Dudgeon, L. S. and Urquart, A. L. (1920). Lancet, 2, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberth, (1880). Arch. f. pathol. Anat. 81. (Ref. Flügge, 1896.)Google Scholar
Engler, and Prantl, (1895). Natürl. Pflanzenfamilien. (Ref. Bergey et al. 1930.)Google Scholar
Flügge, C. (1886). Die Mikroorganismen.Google Scholar
Flügge, C. (1896). Die Mikroorganismen.Google Scholar
Gaffky, (1884). Mitteil. a. d. Kaiserl. Gesundheitsamte, 2, 372. (Ref. Flügge, 1896.)Google Scholar
Gärtner, (1888). Correspond, d. allgemein. ärztl. Vereins Thüringen. (Ref. Bruce White, Med. Res. Counc. System of Bact. 1929, 4.)Google Scholar
Glässer, K. (1909). Dtsch. tierärztl. Wschr. p. 513. (Ref. Zbl. Bakt. Ref. i, 1910, 15, 612.)Google Scholar
Good, E. S. (1912). Bull. Ky. Agric. Expt. Sta. No. 165.Google Scholar
Good, E. S. and Corbett, L. S. (1913). J. Infect. Dis. 13, 53.Google Scholar
Good, E. S. and Corbett, L. S. (1916). J. Infect. Dis. 18, 586.Google Scholar
Gwyn, (1898). Johns Hopk. Hosp. Bull. 9, 54. (Ref. Ford, W. W., Textbook of Bacteriology, 1927.)Google Scholar
Habs, (1933). Zbl. Bakt. Abt. i, Orig. 130, 367.Google Scholar
Hecht-Johansen, (1923). The Classification of the Typhoid-Paratyphoid Group of Bacilli, Copenhagen. (Ref. Bruce White, Med. Res. Counc. System of Bacteriology, 1929, 4.)Google Scholar
Heimann, (1912). Zbl. Bakt. Abt. i, Orig. 66, 211.Google Scholar
Hicks, E. P. (1929–1930). J. Hyg. 29, 446.Google Scholar
Hirschfeld, L. (1919). Lancet, 1, 296.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, H. M. and Schütze, H. (1928). Brit. J. Exp. Path. 9, 353.Google Scholar
Iwaschenzoff, G. (1926). Arch. f. Schiffs- u. Tropen-Hyg. 30, 1.Google Scholar
Jensen, C. O. (1891). Maanedskr. f. Dyrlaeger, 4, 140. (Ref. Kolle and Wassermann, 1913.)Google Scholar
Jensen, C. O. (1913). (Kolle and Wassermann, Handbuch der pathogenen Mikroorganismen, 6, 121.)Google Scholar
Jordan, E. O. (1917). J. Infect. Dis. 20, 457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, E. O. (1934). Amer. J. Trop. Med. 14, 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, E. O. and Victorson, R. (1917). J. Infect. Dis. 21, 554.Google Scholar
Kaensche, (1896). Z. Hyg. Infekt. Kr. 22, 53.Google Scholar
Kauffmann, F. (1929). Zbl. Bakt. Abt. i, Ref. 94, 282.Google Scholar
Kauffmann, F. (1929 a). Z. Hyg. Infekt. Kr. 110, 537.Google Scholar
Kauffmann, F. (1930). Z. Hyg. Infekt. Kr. 111, 221.Google Scholar
Kauffmann, F. (1931). Zbl. f. d. ges. Hyg. 25, 273.Google Scholar
Kauffmann, F. (1934). Zbl. Bakt. Abt. i, Orig. In the Press.Google Scholar
Kauffmann, F. and Mitsui, (1930). Z. Hyg. Infekt. Kr. 111, 740.Google Scholar
Kauffmann, F. and Mitsui, (1930 a). Z. Hyg. Infekt. Kr. 111, 749.Google Scholar
Kauffmann, F. and Silberstein, W. (1934). Zbl. Bakt. Abt. i, Orig. In the Press.Google Scholar
Klebs, (1880–1881). Arch. f. exper. Pathol, u. Pharmacol. 12, 13, 15. (Ref. Flügge, Die Mikroorganismen, 1896.)Google Scholar
Klein, E. (1889). Zbl. Bakt. 5, 689.Google Scholar
Kolle, and Wassermann, (1913). Handbuch der pathogenen Mikroorganismen, 6.Google Scholar
Kristensen, M. and Bojlén, K. (1931). Hosp. Tidende, p. 489, Jahrgang 74.Google Scholar
Kruse, (1896). Flügge, Die Mikroorganismen.Google Scholar
Kurth, (1901). Dtsch. med. Wschr. 30 and 31.Google Scholar
Lehmann, K. B. and Neumann, R. O. (1896). Bakteriologie.Google Scholar
Leslie, P. H. and Shera, A. G. (1931). J. Path. and Bact. 34, 533.Google Scholar
Lignières, J. (1900). Rec. de méd. vét. Par. Ser. 8, 7, 331. (Ref. Buchanan, 1925.)Google Scholar
Ligniéres, J. (1901). Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 15, 734.Google Scholar
Loeffler, (1892). Zbl. Bakt. II, 129.Google Scholar
Lovell, R. (1931). J. Path. and Bact. 34, 13.Google Scholar
MacAdam, W. (1919). Lancet, ii, 189.Google Scholar
Mackie, F. P. and Bowen, G. J. (1919). J. Roy. Army Med. Corps, 33, 154.Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, (1932). Zbl. Bakt. Abt. i, Ref. 105, 377.Google Scholar
Meyer, K. F. and Boerner, F. (1913). J. Med. Res. 29, 325. (Ref. Zbl. Bakt. Abt. i, Ref. 1914, 61, 178.)Google Scholar
Migula, W. (1890). Bakterien-Kunde für Landwirte, Berlin. (Ref. Buchanan, 1925.)Google Scholar
Migula, W. (1894). Arb. Bact. Inst. Karlsruhe, 1, 235.Google Scholar
Migula, W. (1900). System der Bakterien, 2.Google Scholar
Moore, (1895). U.S. Dept. Agr., 12th and 13th Ann. Rep. Bureau Animal Industry, p. 185.Google Scholar
Neukirch, P. (1918). Z. Hyg. Infekt. Kr. 85, 103.Google Scholar
Nocard, (1893). Conseil d' Hygiène publique et Salubrité du Dept. du Seine, Séance, Mar. 24. (Ref. Bruce White, Med. Res. Counc. System of Bacteriology, 1929, 4.)Google Scholar
Peckham, C. F. (1923). J. Hyg. 22, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pesch, K. L. (1926). Zbl. Bakt. Abt. i, Orig. 98, 22.Google Scholar
Pfeiler, W. (1920). Z. Infektskr. des Haustieres, 20, 218.Google Scholar
Pfeiler, W. and Rehse, A. (1913). Mitteil a. d. Kaiser Wilhelm Inst. f. Landwirtschaft in Bromberg, 5, 306.Google Scholar
Pieper, (1926). Zbl. Bakt. 99, 385.Google Scholar
Preisz, H. (1898). Zbl. Bakt. 23, 667 (Abstract).Google Scholar
Rettger, L. F. (1900). New York Med. J. 71, 803.Google Scholar
Rettger, L. F. (1901). New York Med. J. 73, 267. (Ref. Bergey et al. 1930.)Google Scholar
Rettger, L. F. (1909). J. Med. Res. 21, 115.Google Scholar
Rettger, L. F. and Harvey, S. C. (1908). J. Med. Res. 18, 277.Google Scholar
Rettger, L. F. and Scoville, M. M. (1919). Abs. Bact. 3, 8.Google Scholar
Rettger, L. F. and Scoville, M. M. (1920). J. Infect. Dis. 26, 217.Google Scholar
Salmon, D. E. and Smith, T. (1885). Ann. Rep. Bureau of Animal Industry.Google Scholar
Savage, W. G. and Bruce White, P. (1925). Med. Res. Counc. Spec. Rep. Ser. No. 91.Google Scholar
Schermer, and Ehrlich, (1921). Berl. tierärztl. Wschr. 37, 469. (Ref. Zbl. Bakt. Abt. i, Ref. 1922, 73, 252.)Google Scholar
Schottmüller, (1900). Dtsch. med. Wschr. 32, 511.Google Scholar
Schottmüller, (1901). Z. Hyg. Infekt. Kr. 36, 368.Google Scholar
Schröter, (1886). Cohn's Kryptogamen Flora v. Schlesien, 3, i. (Ref. Bergey et al. 1930.)Google Scholar
Schütze, H. (1920). Lancet, i, 93.Google Scholar
Schütze, H. (1928). Arch. Hyg. 100, 181.Google Scholar
Schütze, H. (1930). Brit. J. Exp. Path. 11, 34.Google Scholar
Scott, W. M. (1926). J. Hyg. 25, 398.Google Scholar
Silberstein, W. (1932). Z. Hyg. Infekt.-Kr. 114, 124.Google Scholar
Sladden, A. F. and Scott, W. M. (1927). J. Hyg. 26, 111.Google Scholar
Smith, J. and Scott, W. M. (1930). J. Hyg. 30, 32.Google Scholar
Smith, T. (1893). The Wilder Quarterly Century Book.Google Scholar
Smith, T. (1894). Zbl. Bakt. 16, 231.Google Scholar
Smith, T. and Reagh, A. L. (1903). J. Med. Res. 9, 270.Google Scholar
Trevisan, V. (1879). Rend. R. 1st. Lombardo di Sci. e Lett.Google Scholar
Trevisan, V. (1889). I genera e le specie delle Batteriacee, Milan. (Ref. Buchanan, 1925.)Google Scholar
Warren, S. H. and Scott, W. M. (1929–1930). J. Hyg. 29, 415.Google Scholar
Weichardt, (1932). Ergebnisse der Hygiene, etc. 13, 641.Google Scholar
Weigmann, F. (1925). Zbl. Bakt. Abt. i, Orig. 95, 396.Google Scholar
Weigmann, F. (1925 a). Zbl. Bakt. Abt. i, Orig. 97, Beiheft 299.Google Scholar
Weil, E. (1917). Wien. klin. Wschr. 30, 1061.Google Scholar
Weil, E. and Saxl, P. (1917). Wien. klin. Wschr. 30, 519.Google Scholar
Weldin, (1927). Iowa State J. Sci. 1, 121. (Ref. Bergey et al. 1930.)Google Scholar
Wherry, W. B. (1908). J. Infect. Dis. 5, 519.Google Scholar
White, P. Bruce (1926). Med. Res. Counc. Spec. Rep. Ser. No. 103.Google Scholar
White, P. Bruce (1929). Med. Res. Counc. System of Bacteriology, 4, 86.Google Scholar
White, P. Bruce (1929 a). J. Path. and Bact. 32, 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, P. Bruce (1929–1930). J. Hyg. 29, 443.Google Scholar
Wordley, E. (1923). Lancet, ii, 105.Google Scholar
Zopf, (1885). Die Spaltpilze, 3 Aufl., 136. (Ref. Flügge, 1896.)Google Scholar