Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:21:54.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Further Studies on the Serological Classification of Haemolytic Streptococci

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. Smith
J. Smith
Affiliation:
(The Laboratory, City Hospital, Aberdeen.)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In a preliminary paper (1926) I have shown that most strains of haemolytic streptococci obtained from scarlet fever may be placed in two very definite serological groups. The strains from 119 cases were found to belong to Type I, from 57 cases to Type II, while from 34 cases the strains were un-identified. That the scarlatinal streptococci do not form one serological group has been confirmed by Griffith (1926) and by James (1926). Further, the sera and type cultures used in this investigation have been interchanged with those of Dr Griffith, and his Types I and II strains have been found to conform with the main serological types found in Aberdeen.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , October 1927 , pp. 420 - 433
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1927

References

REFERENCES

Brown, H. C. and Kirwan, E. W. O'G. (1915). Indian J. Med. Research, 2, 763.Google Scholar
De Kruif, P. and Northrop, J. H. (1923). J. Exp. Med. 87, 647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dick, G. H. and Dick, G. F. (1923). J. Amer. Med. Assoc. 81, 1166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, F. (1926). J. of Hygiene, 25, 385.Google Scholar
James, G. R. (1926). J. of Hygiene, 25, 415.Google Scholar
Kinloch, J. P., Smith, J. and Taylor, J. S. (1927). J. of Hygiene, 26. (In the press.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolle, C., Conseil, E. and Durand, P. (1926). Ann. Inst. Pasteur de Tunis, 15, 229.Google Scholar
Smith, J. (1926). J. of Hygiene, 25, 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar