Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T23:30:58.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Flies and Typhoid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

William Nicoll
William Nicoll
Affiliation:
(Australian Institute of Tropical Medicine.)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The chain of evidence incriminating the house fly as a disseminator of typhoid fever is at present fairly complete, but many of the links are weak and not thoroughly strengthened by experimentation.

2. The bulk of experimental work has hitherto been done under highly unnatural and artificial circumstances and the results so obtained cannot be accepted unreservedly as giving a correct view of conditions in nature.

3. The experiments described in the present paper show that flies can ingest typhoid bacilli from natural matter, i.e. human faeces and urine, and carry them for a certain period of time.

4. There is no evidence to show that the typhoid bacilli multiply in the house fly. On the contrary the evidence goes to show that they are not adapted for prolonged life on or in the fly.

5. It thus follows that the house fly is a purely mechanical carrier of the typhoid bacillus and is not a natural “host” in the strict sense of the term.

6. Many bacilli closely resembling B. typhosus in cultural characteristics appear to be natural or, at least, common inhabitants of the intestine of the house fly. These are extremely likely to be mistaken for B. typhosus unless the most stringent tests are employed.

7. As might be expected there is evidence to show that a process of bacterial selection occurs in the fly's intestine. Some bacteria appear to flourish but others are rapidly eliminated. Among the latter must be numbered B. typhosus.

I have to thank my colleagues at the Lister Institute, particularly Dr Ledingham, Dr Henderson Smith and Dr Petrie, for much valuable help and advice during the course of these investigations. To Prof. Bainbridge, Dr Arkwright, Dr Penfold and Dr Macalister my thanks are also due, inasmuch as they helped to smooth over many difficulties both theoretical and practical.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , February 1917 , pp. 505 - 526
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1917

References

REFERENCES

Bahr, P. H. (1913). Dysentery in Fiji.Google Scholar
Ficker, M. (1903). Typhus und Fliegen. Arch. f. Hygiene, XLVI. 274–283.Google Scholar
Graham-Smith, G. (1911). Further observations on the ways in which artificially infected Flies (Musca domestica and Calliphora erythrocephala) carry and distribute Pathogenic and other bacteria. Report to the Local Government Board on Public Health and Medical Subjects. New Series, No. 53, 31–18.Google Scholar
Graham-Smith, G. (1912). An Investigation of the Incidence of the Micro-organisms known as Non-Lactose-Fermenters in flies in normal surroundings and in surroundings associated with Epidemic Diarrhoea. 41st Annual Report of the Local Government Board. Supplement containing the Report of the Medical Officer for 1911–12, Appendix 13, 304–329.Google Scholar
Graham-Smith, G. (1913). Flies in Relation to Disease, Non-bloodsucking Flies. Cambridge University Press, pp. 292.Google Scholar
Ledingham, J. C. (1911). On the Survival of Specific Micro-organisms in Pupae and Imagines of Musca domestica raised from experimentally infected larvae. Experiments with B. typhosus. Journ. of Hygiene, XL. 333–340.Google Scholar
Morgan, H. de R. and Ledingham, J. C. G. (1909). The Bacteriology of Summer Diarrhoea. Proc. Royal Soc. Medicine, XI. (Epidem. Sect.), 133–158.Google Scholar
Nicholls, L. (1912). The Transmissions of Pathogenic Micro-organisms by flies in Saint Lucia. Bull. Entomol. Research, III. 81.Google Scholar
Nicoll, W. (1912). On the Varieties of Bacillus coli associated with the House Fly (Musca domestica). Journ. of Hygiene, XI. 381–389.Google Scholar
Tebbutt, A. H. (1913). On the Influence of the Metamorphosis of Musca domestica upon bacteria administered in the larval stage. Journ. of Hygiene, XII. 516–526.Google Scholar