Hostname: page-component-669899f699-rg895 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-28T12:02:29.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Examination of floor dust for haemolytic streptococci

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

R. E. O. Williams
R. E. O. Williams
Affiliation:
From the air Hygiene Unit and Streptococcal Reference Laboratory, central publilc health laboratory, colindale, London, N.W. 9
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Floor dust has been collected for bacteriological examination by three methods: (1) with a miniature vacuum cleaner in which the ‘bag’ consists of a paper Soxhlet extraction thimable, (2)by sweeping, and (3)by blowing the dust on to the surface of a culture plate. The dust on to the surface of a culture plate. the dust from on to the first two methods was shaken with broth and an aliquot sample plated out on crystal-violet blood ager plates.

Surface inoculation of the plates was found to give somewhat higher counts than the use of pour plates, but otherwise minor variations in the routine were without great effect on the count.

Analysis of the results obtained in examining a number of specimerns from schoolrooms and day nurseries showed that, though the counts of streptococci in successive samples from one dust suspension agreed well, there was wide variation between the counts from duplicate samples of dust, however collected; the frequency distribution of the counts in rooms was of the log-normal type. It is clear that in routine work, all the dust collected from the whole floor of a room should be examined, in order to give the most reliable result.

Of 185 specimens in which four colonies of haemolyt streptococci were grouped, 67% had all four strains of group A. Ofniety-four samples in which four group A strains were typed, 55 % had all four strains of the same type; more than one type was found in 20 %.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 47 , Issue 4 , December 1949 , pp. 416 - 425
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1949

References

REFERENCES

Bartlett, M. S. (1947). The use of transformations. Biometrics, 3, 39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crone, P. B. (1948). The counting of surface colonies of bacteria. J. Hug., Camb., 46, 426.Google ScholarPubMed
Lidwell, O. M. & Lowbury, E. J. (1950). The distribution of bacteria in floor dust. (in the Press).Google Scholar
Reed, R. W. & Reed, G. B. (1948). Drop plate method of counting viable bacteria. Canad. J. Res. (Sect. E), 26, 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, T. L. (1947). The relative errors of bacteriological plate counting methods. J. Bact. 54, 641.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed