Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:23:59.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The epidemiology of Sarcocystis spp. in cattle of Western Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

G. Savini ,
J. D. Dunsmore ,
I. D. Robertson  and
P. Seneviratna
G. Savini
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Studies, Murdoch University, Perth 6150, Western Australia
J. D. Dunsmore*
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Studies, Murdoch University, Perth 6150, Western Australia
I. D. Robertson
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Studies, Murdoch University, Perth 6150, Western Australia
P. Seneviratna
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Studies, Murdoch University, Perth 6150, Western Australia
*
*Author for correspondence.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Oesophagus samples from 714 cattle from Western Australia were examined by artificial digestion to detect the presence of Sarcocystis spp. The overall prevalence of infection was 52%. The prevalence of infection increased with age and was highest in the entire males (92%). The prevalence was lower in cattle which originated from arid and semiarid regions (9 and 31% respectively) than those from tropical (87%) and temperate (60%) regions. possible reasons for these differences are discussed and it is concluded that environmental and management factors as well as host age and sex influence the prevalence of infection with Sarcocystis spp. in cattle.

Type
Research Article
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 108 , Issue 1 , February 1992 , pp. 107 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

References

REFERENCES

1.Fayer, R, Dubey, JP.Bovine sarcocystosis. Comp Cont Educ Pract Vet 1986; 8: 130–42.Google Scholar
2.Levine, ND. Nomenclature of Sarcocystis in the ox and sheep of fecal coccidia of the dog and cat. J Parasitol 1977; 63: 36–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Gestrich, R, Heydorn, AO, Baysu, N.Beitrage zum lebenszyklus der sarkosporidien. VI. Untersuchungen zur artendifferenzierung bei Sarcocystis fusifofmis und Sarcocystis tenella. Berl Muench Tieraeztl ?Wshr 1975; 88: 191–7.Google ScholarPubMed
4.Mehlhorn, H, Heydorn, AO, Gestrich, R. Licht und elektronenmikroskopische untersuchungen an cysten von Sarcocystis fusiformis in der muskulatur von kalbern nach experimenteller infektion mit oocysten und sporocysten der grossen form von Isospora bigemina des hundes. 1. Zur entstehung der cyste und der ‘cystenwand’. Zbl Bakt Hyg I Abt Origh A 1975; 232: 392–402.Google Scholar
5.Levine, ND. The taxonomy of Sarcocystis (Protozoa, Apicomplexa) species. J Parasitol 1986; 72: 372–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Collins, GH, Charlenston, WAG. Studies on Sarcocystis species VII. The effect of the temperature on the viability of macrocysts (Sarcocystis gigantea) of sheep. N Z Vet J 1980; 28: 189–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Fayer, R.Effects of refrigeration, cooking, and freezing on Sarcocystis in beef from retailed food store. Proc Helminth Soe Wash 1975; 42: 138–40.Google Scholar
8.Bottner, A, Charleston, WAG, Pomroy, WE, Rommel, M. The prevalence and identity of Sarcocystis in cattle in New Zealand. Vet Parasitol 1987; 24: 157–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Vercruysse, J, Fransen, J, Van Goubergen, M. The prevalence and identity of Sarcocystis cysts in cattle in Belgium. J Vet Med B 1989; 36: 148–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Cribb, J. ed. National Farmers' Federation Australian, Agricultural Year Book, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia: Strand Publishing Pty Ltd, 1985.Google Scholar
11.Dubey, JP, Speer, CA, Fayer, R. Sarcocystosis of animals and man. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press Inc, 1989.Google Scholar
12.Hinaidy, HK, Burgu, A, Supperer, R, Kallab, K. Sarkosporidienbefall des rindes in Osterreich. Wien Tieraerztl Monatsschr 1979; 66: 181–4 (cited by Dubey, JP, Speer, CA, Fayer, R. Sarcocystosis of animals and man. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press Inc, 1989).Google Scholar
13.Boch, J, Erber, M. Vorkommen sowie wirtschaftliche und hygienische bedeutung der Sarkosporidien von rind, shaf und schwein. Fleischwirtschaft 1981; 61: 1–5 (cited by Dubey, JP, Speer, CA, Fayer, R. Sarcocystosis of animals and man. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press Inc, 1989).Google Scholar
14.Fayer, R.Epidemiology of protozoan infections: the Coccidia. Vet Parasitol 1980; 6: 75–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Solomon, GB. Development of Nippostrongylus brasiliensis in gonadectomized and hormonetreated hamsters. Exp Parasitol 1966; 18: 374–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Barrows, PL, Prestwood, AK, Green, CE. Experimental Sarcocystis suicanis infections: disease in growing pigs. Am J Vet Res 1982; 43: 1409–12.Google ScholarPubMed
17.Dubey, JP. Immunity to sarcocystosis: modification of intestinal coccidiosis and disappearance of sarcocysts in dairy goats. Vet Parasitol 1983; 13: 23–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.O'Toole, D.Experimental ovine sarcocystosis: sequential ultrastructural pathology in skeletal muscle. J Comp Path 1987; 97: 51–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Dubey, JP. A review of Sarcocystis of domestic animals and of other coccidia of cats and dogs. J Am Vet Med Ass 1976; 169: 1061–78.Google ScholarPubMed