Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T21:38:25.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The epidemiology of infection with Pseudomonas pyocyanea in a burns unit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

E. J. L. Lowbury  and
Jean Fox
E. J. L. Lowbury
Affiliation:
The M.R.C. Industrial Injuries and Burns Research Units, Birmingham Accident Hospital, Bath Row, Birmingham 15
Jean Fox
Affiliation:
The M.R.C. Industrial Injuries and Burns Research Units, Birmingham Accident Hospital, Bath Row, Birmingham 15
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A bacteriological study of burned patients and of the staff and environment in a burns unit was made with the purpose of discovering the principal reservoirs and routes of transfer of Ps. pyocyanea.

Infected burns appeared to be the most important reservoirs. About 3 % of the stools of normal subjects and of patients with intestinal symptoms carried the organism, which was also isolated from the nose, throat, nasopharynx, skin and ear of a small proportion of patients and staff in the burns wards.

The hands of nurses in the wards were often contaminated with Ps. pyocyanea, and presented a likely vector in the transfer of the organism by contact—e.g. from the bandages of infected patients, and from furniture and other objects near to their beds.

It was shown by slide agglutination that a new type of Ps. pyocyanea admitted to one of the wards spread freely in that ward but hardly at all to the other ward. Since patients from both wards used the same dressing station and operating theatres, it seemed from this finding that a large proportion of the cross-infection occurred in the wards.

Polymyxin dusting powder was shown in a controlled trial to protect exposed burns against contamination by Ps. pyocyanea.

These results are discussed in relation to the mechanism of transfer of the organism and the methods of preventing cross-infection. The need to use several methods concurrently is emphasized, since none of those which have been investigated contributes more than a partial effect. Cubicle wards are advocated, since much cross-infection is shown to occur in open wards.

We are much indebted to Dr G. T. Cook for kindly letting us use results obtained by him at the Oxford Public Health Laboratory. We also wish to thank Prof. J. F. D. Shrewsbury of Birmingham University and our colleagues at the Birmingham Accident Hospital for their valuable co-operation, and Dr A. C. Cunliffe of King's College Hospital for information on the typing of Proteus from patients in our wards.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , September 1954 , pp. 403 - 416
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1954

References

REFERENCES

Barber, M., Hayhoe, F. G. H. & Whitehead, J. E. M. (1949). Penicillin resistant staphylococci in a maternity hospital. Lancet, 2, 803.Google Scholar
Bourdillon, R. B. & Colebrook, L. (1946). Air hygiene in dressing rooms for burns or major wounds. Lancet, 1, 561, 601.Google Scholar
Bourdillon, R. B., Lidwell, O. M. & Thomas, J. C. (1941). A slit sampler for collecting and counting airborne bacteria. J. Hyg., Camb., 41, 197.Google Scholar
Bradley, W. H. (1938). The spread of streptococcal disease. Brit. med. J. 2, 733.Google Scholar
Bull, J. P., Squire, J. R. & Topley, E. (1948). Experiments with occlusive dressings of a new plastic. Lancet, 2, 213.Google Scholar
Christie, R. (1948). Observations on the biochemical and serological characteristics of Pseudomonas pyocyanea. Aust. J. exp. Biol. med. Sci. 26, 425.Google Scholar
Clark, A. M., Colebrook, L., Gibson, T., Thomson, M. L. & Foster, A. (1943). Penicillin and propamidine in burns. Lancet, 1, 605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colebrook, L. & Colebrook, V. (1951). A suggested national plan to reduce burning accidents. Lancet, 2, 579.Google Scholar
Colebrook, L., Duncan, J. M. & Ross, W. P. D. (1948). The control of infection in burns. Lancet, 1, 893.Google Scholar
Colebrook, L. & Hood, A. M. (1948). Infection through soaked dressings. Lancet, 2, 682.Google Scholar
Cruickshank, C. N. D. & Lowbury, E. J. L. (1953). The effect of pyocyanin on human skin cells and leucocytes. Brit. J. exp. Path. 34, 583.Google Scholar
Cruickshank, R. (1935). Bacterial infection of burns. J. Path. Bact. 41, 367.Google Scholar
Florey, M. E., Ross, R. W. N. L. & Turton, E. C. (1947). Infection of wounds with gram negative organisms. Lancet, 1, 855.Google Scholar
Fox, J. E. & Lowbury, E. J. L. (1953 a). Immunity to Ps. pyocyanea in man. J. Path. Bact. 65, 519.Google Scholar
Fox, J. E. & Lowbury, E. J. L. (1953 b). Immunity and antibody to Ps. pyocyanea in rabbits. J. Path. Bact. 65, 533.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. M., Lowbury, E. J. L. & Topley, E. (1951). Ps. pyocyanea in burns: its role as a pathogen, and the value of local polymyxin therapy. Lancet, 2, 137.Google Scholar
Keevil, N. L. & Camps, F. E. (1937). Epidemic streptococcal infection in a general hospital. Lancet, 2, 207.Google Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L. (1950). The persistence of dust in occupied rooms. J. Hyg., Camb., 48, 1.Google Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L. (1951 a). Contamination of Cetrimide and other fluids with Pseudomonas pyocyanea. Brit. J. industr. Med. 8, 22.Google Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L. (1951 b). Improved culture methods for the detection of Ps. pyocyanea. J. clin. Path. 4, 66.Google Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L. (1954). Air conditioning with filtered air for dressing burns. Lancet, 1, 292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L. & Fox, J. E. (1953). The influence of atmospheric drying on the survival of wound flora. J. Hyg., Camb., 51, 203.Google Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L. & Hood, A. M. (1951). A disinfectant barrier in dressings applied to burns. Lancet, 1, 899.Google Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L., Topley, E. & Hood, A. M. (1952). Chemotherapy for Staphylococcus areus in burns. Lancet, 1, 1036.Google Scholar
Medical Research Council (1941). The prevention of ‘hospital infection’ of wounds. War Mem. Med. Res. Coun. Lond. no. 6.Google Scholar
Medical Reseabch Council (1945). Studies of burns and scalds. Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Coun., Lond., no. 249. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Meleney, F. L. (1948). Treatise on Surgical Infections, p. 223. New York.Google Scholar
Ricketts, C. R., Squire, J. R. & Topley, E. (1951). Clin. Sci. 10, 89.Google Scholar
Ringen, L. M. & Drake, C. H. (1952). A study of the incidence of Pseudomonas aeriginosa from various sources. J. Bact. 64, 841.Google Scholar
Rountree, P. M. & Thomson, E. F. (1949). Incidence of penicillin resistant staphylococci in a hospital. Lancet, 2, 501.Google Scholar
Růžička, S. (1898). Experimentelle Studien über die veriabilität wichtiger charactere des B. pyocyaneus und des B. fluorescens liquefaciens. Zbl. Bakt. 24, 11.Google Scholar
Topley, W. W. C. & Wilson, G. S. (1946). Principles of Bacteriology and Immunity, p. 1993; third edition, London.Google Scholar
Wallace, A. B. (1949). Treatment of burns. Brit. J. plast. Surg. 1, 232.Google Scholar