Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:56:36.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Epidemiological investigations on Campylobacter jejuni in households with a primary infection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

J. Oosterom ,
C. H. den Uyl ,
J. R. J. Bänffer  and
J. Huisman
J. Oosterom
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Water and Food Microbiology, National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Hygiene, P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands
C. H. den Uyl
Affiliation:
University of Agriculture, Laboratory for Food Microbiology and Hygiene, de Dreyen 12, 6703 BC Wageningen, The Netherlands
J. R. J. Bänffer
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Epidemiological Bacteriology, Municipal Public Health Service, P.O. Box 333, 3000 AH Rotterdam, The Netherlands
J. Huisman
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases and Hygiene, Municipal Public Health Service, P.O. Box 70032, 3000 LP Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Fifty-four Rotterdam patients in which a primary infection with Campylobacter jejuni had been detected (index patients) were compared with 54 control subjects with regard to the consumption and preparation of foods 7 days before onset of illness and the keeping of pet animals. Significantly more index patients than controls had eaten chicken meat (47 v. 29; P = 0·0002), particularly at barbecues (14 v. 2; P = 0·0015). Marginally more index patients had eaten pork (47 v. 39; P = 0·048) or inadequately heated meat (13 v. 8), though in the last case numbers were too small to be statistically significant. The consumption of beef or mutton and outdoor eating (other than at barbecues) were essentially the same in both groups. There was no significant association with the keeping of pet animals, although a few more index patients had cage birds than controls (18 v. 12).

Twenty-one (15%) of 130 household contacts of index patients also suffered from diarrhoea during the same period. Circumstantial evidence pointed to a common source of infection with the index patient in 13 instances (nine households) and probable intrafamilial spread of infection in six instances.

Campylobacters were isolated from one of 110 swabs of kitchen work surfaces and eight of 107 swabs taken from lavatory bowls in index households.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 93 , Issue 2 , October 1984 , pp. 325 - 332
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

References

Al-Mashat, R. R. & Taylor, D. J. (1980). Campylobacter spp. in enteric lesions in cattle. Veterinary Record 107, 31–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anonymous (1981). Campylobacter infections 1977–1980. British Medical Journal i, 484.Google Scholar
Blaser, M., Cravens, J., Powers, B. W. & Wang, W. L. (1978). Campylobacter enteritis associated with canine infection. Lancet ii, 979–981.Google Scholar
Brouwer, R., Mertens, M. J. A., Siem, T. H. & Katchaki, J. (1979). An explosive outbreak of Campylobacter enteritis in soldiers. Antonie van Leeuicenhoek 45, 517–519.Google Scholar
Bruce, D., Zochowski, W. & Fleming, G. A. (1980). Campylobacter infections in cats and dogs. Veterinary Record 107, 200–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butzler, J. P. & Skirrow, M. B. (1979). Campylobacter enteritis. Clinics in Gastroenterology 8, 737–765.Google Scholar
Clark, B. L. & Monsbourgh, M. J. (1979). The prevalence of Campylobacter fetus in the gall bladder of sheep. Australian Veterinary Journal 55, 42–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devriese, L. & Devos, A. (1971). Vibrio app. bij pluimvee: isolatie, identifieatie en experimentele infectie. Tijdschrift voor Diergeneeskunde 96, 193–201.Google Scholar
Hartog, B. J. & Boer, E. De (1982). Campylobacter jejuni in poultry products from retail outlets and in poultry slaughterhouses. In Campylobacter: Epidemiology, Pathogenexisand Biochemistry (ed. Newell, D. G.), p. 270. Lancaster: MTP Press.Google Scholar
Kist, M. (1982). Campylobacter enteritis: epidemiological and clinical data from recent isolations in the region of Freiburg. West Germany. In Campylobacter: Epidemiology. Pathogenesis and Biochemistry (ed. Newell, D. G.), pp. 138–143. Lancaster: MTP Press.Google Scholar
Luechtefeld, N. A. W., Blaser, M. J.. Reiller, L. B. & Wang, W.-L. L. (1980). Isolation of Campylobacter fetus suhsp. jejuni from migratory waterfowl. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 12 (3), 406–408.Google Scholar
Mouton, R. P., Veltkamp, J. J.. Lauwers, S. & Butzler, J. P. (1982). Analysis of a small outbreak of campylobacter infections with high morbidity. In Campylobacter: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis and Biochemistry (ed. Newell, D. G.), pp. 129–134. Lancaster: MTP Press.Google Scholar
Norkrans, G. & Svedhem, A. (1982). Epidemiological aspects of Campylobacter jejuni enteritis. Journal of Hygiene 89, 163–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oosterom, J. (1980). The presence of Campylobacter fetus subspecies jejuni in normal slaughtered pigs. Tijdschrift voor Diergeneeskunde 105, 49–50.Google Scholar
Oosterom, J., Vereijken, M. J. G. M. & Engels, G. B. (1981). Campylobacter isolation. Veterinary Quarterly 3, 104.Google Scholar
Oosterom, J., Engels, G. B., Peters, R. & Pot, R. (1982). Campylobacter jejuni in cattle and in raw milk in The Netherlands. Journal of Food Protection 45 (13), 1212–1213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oosterom, J., Notermans, S., Karman, H. & Engels, G. B. (1983 a). Origin and prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni in poultry processing. Journal of Food Protection 46 (4), 339–344.Google Scholar
Oosterom, J., Wilde, G. J. A. De, Boer, E. De, Blaauw, L. H. De & Karman, H. (1983 b). Survival of Campylobacter jejuni during poultry processing and pig slaughtering. Journal of Food Protection 46 (8), 702–706.Google Scholar
Oosterom, J., Uyl, C. H. Den, Bänffer, J. R. J., Lauwers, S., Huisman, J., Busschbach, A. E., Poelma, F. G. J. &, Bellemans, R. (1984). Evaluation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of Campylobacter jejuni antibodies, and comparison with a complement fixation test (CFT). Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Robinson, D. A. & Jones, D. M. (1981). Milk-borne Campylobacter infection. British Medical Journal i, 1374–1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schothorst, M. Van, Huisman, J. & Os, M. Van (1978). Search for Salmonellae in homes with salmonellosis in infants. Nederlandsch Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde 122 (31), 1121–1125.Google ScholarPubMed
Severin, W. J. P. (1978). Campylobacter and enteritis. Nederlandsch Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde 122, 499–504.Google ScholarPubMed
Severin, W. J. P. (1982). Epidemiology of Campylobacter infection. In Campylobacter: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis and Biochemistry (ed. Newell, D. G.), pp. 285–287. Lancaster: MTP Press.Google Scholar
Skirrow, M. B. (1977). Campylobacter enteritis: a ‘new’ disease. British Medical Journal ii, 9–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skirrow, M. B. & Benjamin, J. (1980). ‘1001’ Campylobacters: cultural characteristics of intestinal campylobacters from man and animals. Journal of Hygiene 85, 427–442.Google Scholar
Smibert, R. M. (1969). Vibrio fetus var. intestinalis isolated from the intestinal content of birds. American Journal of Veterinary Research 30, 1437–1442.Google Scholar
Teufel, P. (1982). Campylobacter fetus spp. jejuni – Ausscheidungsraten beim Schwein und überleben in Leitungswasser und Hackfleisch. Fleischwirtschaft 62 (10), 1344–1345.Google Scholar
Turnbull, P. C. B. & Rose, P. (1982). Campylobacter jejuni and salmonella in raw red meats. Journal of Hygiene 88, 29–37.Google Scholar
Wit, J. C. De, Broekhuizen, G. & Kampelmacher, E. H. (1979). Cross-contamination during the preparation of frozen chickens in the kitchen. Journal of Hygiene 83, 27–32.Google Scholar