Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T04:16:42.984Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effectiveness of hand washing and disinfection methods in removing transient bacteria after patient nursing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Juhani Ojajärvi
Juhani Ojajärvi
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health Science, University of Helsinki, Haarlmaninkatu 3. 00290 Helsinki 29, Finland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The effectiveness of various hand washing and disinfection methods in removing transient skin bacteria was studied in hospital after dry or moist contamination of the hands when nursing burn patients. The results were compared with those of laboratory tests with volunteers. A fairly good correlation of the bacterial reductions existed between hospital and laboratory tests. All other methods removed Slaph. aureus from the hands more effectively than liquid soap. Gram-negative bacilli were more easily removed than staphylococci, even with soap wash alone.

In hospital, none of the washing and disinfection methods always removed all patient-borne bacteria from the hands. After dry or moist contamination and subsequent washing with soap only, colonies of Staph. aureus were often detected in finger-print samples. Staphylococci wero more often completely removed by a 4% chlorhexidine detergent scrub and alcoholic solutions (either with or without previous soap wash) than by liquid soap, hexachlorophene or iodophor preparations. Gram-negative bacilli were more easily removed by all the washing and disinfection methods. After moist contamination, Gram-negative bacilli were more often completely removed from the hands by ethanol than by other treatments.

The results of the present study emphasize the importance of always using gloves when nursing a profuse spreader of bacteria or one who must be protected from infection.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 85 , Issue 2 , October 1980 , pp. 193 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

References

REFERENCES

Ayliffe, G. A. J., Babb, J. R., Bridges, K., Lilly, H. A., Lowbury, E. J. L., Varney, J. & Wilkins, M. D. (1975). Comparison of two methods for assessing the removal of total organisms and pathogens from the skin. Journal of Hygiene 75, 259.Google Scholar
Brodie, J. (1965). Hand hygiene. Scottish Medical Journal 10, 115.Google Scholar
Casewell, M. & Phillips, I. (1977). Hands as a route of transmission for Klebsiella species. British Medical Journal ii, 1315.Google Scholar
Ericson, C., Juhlin, I. & Willard, L. O. (1968). Removal of the superficial bacterial flora of the hands – a comparison between different antibacterial preparations and soap. Acla Chirurgica Scandinavica 134, 7.Google Scholar
Lilly, H. A. & Lowbury, E. J. L. (1978). Transient skin flora. Their removal by cleansing or disinfection in relation to their mode of deposition. Journal of Clinical Pathology 31, 910.Google Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L. & Lilly, H. A. (1973). Use of 4% chlorhexidine detergent solution (Hibiscrub) and other methods of skin disinfection. British Medical Journal i, 510.Google Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L. & Lilly, H. A. (1975). Gloved hand as applicator of antiseptic to operation sites. Lancel ii, 153.Google Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L., Lilly, H. A. & Ayliffe, G. A. J. (1974). Preoperative disinfection of surgeons’ hands: use of alcoholic solutions and effects of gloves on skin flora. British Medical Journal iv, 369.Google Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L., Lilly, H. A. & Bull, J. P. (1964). Disinfection of hands: removal of transient organisms. British Medical Journal ii, 230.Google Scholar
Mittermayer, H. & Rotter, M. (1975). Vorgleich dor Wirkung von Wassor, einigen Detergention und Äthylalkohol auf die transiente Flora der Hände. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie, Parasitenkunde, Infektionskrankheitcn und Hygiene, I. Abtcilung: Orig. B 160, 103.Google Scholar
Noble, W. C. & Somerville, D. A. (1974). Microbiology of Human Skin. Volumo 2 in the Series: Major Problems in Dermatology, p. 175. London, Philadelphia, Toronto: W. B. Saunders.Google Scholar
Ojajärvi, J., Mäkelä, P. & Rantasalo, I. (1977). Failure of hand disinfection with frequent hand washing: a need for prolonged field studies. Journal of Hygiene 79, 107.Google Scholar
Salzman, T. C., Clark, J. J. & Klemm, L. (1907). Hand contamination of personnel as a mochanism of cross-infection in nosocomial infections with antibiotic-resistant Eschcrichia coli and Klebsiclla-Aerobacter. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 7, 97.Google Scholar
Sprunt, K., Redman, W. & Leidy, G. (1973). Antibacterial effectiveness of routine hand washing. Pediatrics 52, 204.Google Scholar