Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-j4qg9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T01:43:29.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine combined with Bordetella parapertussis vaccine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Neda Köhler-Kubelka
Neda Köhler-Kubelka
Affiliation:
The Institute of Immunology, Mirogojska 6, Zagreb, Yugoslavia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Investigations carried out to ascertain the ability of various strains of Bordetella pertussis and B. parapertussis to produce agglutinins have shown that the agglutinin response is considerably greater with B. parapertussis.

Children inoculated with a combined vaccine in which the parapertussis element contained B. parapertussis in only one-twelfth of the concentration of B. pertussis in the pertussis element showed agglutinins in their sera in titres well above 1:300 for both organisms. There were no cross-reactions and the serological responses were specific throughout. The vaccine used was the standard diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) prophylactic to which had been added a vaccine prepared from recently isolated strains of B. parapertussis.

Agglutinin titres of both whooping cough components with the combined vaccine were somewhat lower in mice than was the case when monovalent vaccines were used, but they were considered to be satisfactory.

It is suggested that the agglutination production test in mice could be used for the assessment of protective power of B. parapertussis vaccines against infection.

I wish to thank Dr Ikić, director of the Institute of Immunology, Zagreb, who enabled me to perform all these examinations, further to Dr B. Mravunac and Dr Z. Radanov for having carried out vaccination in children and for the clinical examination of post vaccination reactions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 60 , Issue 3 , September 1962 , pp. 289 - 293
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

References

Evans, D. G. & Perkins, F. T. (1953). An agglutinin production test in the study of pertussis vaccines. J. Path. Bact. 66, 479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detlor, M. (1951). Agglutination of H. pertussis using concavity slides. J. clin. Path. 4, 487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Köhler-Kubelka, N. (1957). Results of serological examination in children vaccinated with our Di-Te-Per vaccine. Lij. Vjes. 79, 745.Google Scholar
Lautrop, H. (1958). Observations on parapertussis in Denmark 1950–1957. Acta Path. Microb. Scandinav. 43, 255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rambar, A. C., Howell, K. M. & Deneholz, E. J. (1947). Pertussis.Parapertussis vaccine. J. Pediat. 31, 556.Google Scholar
Vysoká-Burianová, B. (1960). Immunological survey of the prevalence of antibodies against pertussis and parapertussis in some regions of Czechoslovakia. Česk. Epidem. 9, 523.Google Scholar
Zuelzer, W. W. & Wheeler, W. E. (1947). Parapertussis pneumonia. J. Pediat. 29, 493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar