Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:12:04.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of some immunological methods for the differentiation of strains of foot-and-mouth disease virus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

A. J. Forman
A. J. Forman
Affiliation:
Animal Virus Research Institute, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey*
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Two FMDV strains which had been previously differentiated by complement-fixation were compared by guinea-pig protection test, kinetic neutralization and micro-neutralization tests. It was found that these tests, which have not been previously applied by the methods described, were all capable of FMDV strain differentiation. Similar differences were found by all methods, which suggests that comparisons made by cross-CF, cross-neutralization or cross-protection involve measurement of the same antigen/antibody interactions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 74 , Issue 2 , April 1975 , pp. 215 - 225
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

References

REFERENCES

Bachrach, H. L., Trautman, R. & Breese, S. S. (1964). Chemical and physical properties of virtually pure foot-and-mouth disease virus. American Journal of Veterinary Research 25, 333–42.Google ScholarPubMed
Brooksby, J. B. (1952). The technique of complement fixation in foot-and-mouth disease research. Agricultural Research Council Report Series No. 12. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Brown, F. & Cartwright, B. (1963). Purification of radioactive foot-and-mouth disease virus. Nature, London 199, 1168–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Capstick, P. B., Sellers, R. F. & Stewart, D. L. (1959). The neutralization of the virus of foot-and-mouth disease by immune serum. Archiv für die gesamte Virusforschung 9, 606–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Castro, M. P. (1964). Behaviour of the foot-and-mouth disease virus in cell cultures; susceptibility of the IB-RS-2 cell line. Archivos do Institute biólogico, Sâo Paulo 31, 63–78.Google Scholar
Dulbecco, R., Vogt, M. & Strickland, A. G. R. (1956). A study of the basic aspects of neutralisation of two animal viruses, western equine encephalitis virus and poliomyelitis virus. Virology 2, 162–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunlap, R. C. & Barker, L. F. (1973). Vaccinia virus strain differences. I. Neutralisation of vaccinia virus strains by homologous and heterologous antisera. Archiv für die gesamte Virusforschung 42, 107–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fontaine, J., Terre, J., Roumiantzeff, M., Dubouclard, C., Bornarel, P. & Favre, H. (1966). Méthodes d'étude immunologique des variants du virus aphteux. Bulletin de la Société des Sciences Vétérinaires et de Médecine comparée de Lyon 68, 1–13.Google Scholar
Forman, A. J. (1974). A study of foot-and-mouth disease virus strains by complement fixation. II. A comparison of tube and microplate tests for the differentiation of strains. Journal of Hygiene 72, 407–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerche, J., Durand, M., Giraud, M., Colson, X. & Prunet, P. (1972). Apropos des variants aphteux; essai comparatif de differentiation sérologique et immunologique. Report No. 600, XIII Conference of the Permanent Committee on Foot-and-Mouth Disease. Paris: Office International des Epizooties.Google Scholar
Hedger, R. S. & Herniman, K. A. (1966). The Middle East foot-and-mouth disease type A epizootic 1964–65. I. Epizootiology and antigenic studies. Bulletin de l'office International des Epizooties 65, 303.Google Scholar
Henderson, W. M., Galloway, I. A. & Brooksby, J. B. (1948). Strains of the virus of foot-and-mouth disease recovered from outbreaks in Mexico. Vaccination experiments. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 69, 77–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyslop, N. St. G, Davie, J. & Carter, S. P. (1963). Antigenic differences between strains of foot-and-mouth disease virus of type SAT 1. Journal of Hygiene 61, 217–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kärber, G. (1931). Beitrag zür kollektiven Behandlung pharmakologischer Reihenversuche. Archiv für Experimentelle Pathologie und Pharmakologie 162, 480–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride, W. D. (1959). Antigenic analysis of polioviruses by kinetic studies of serum neutralisation. Virology 7, 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, W. B., Davies, E. B. & Smith, I. M. (1962). The immunisation of cattle with a mouse-adapted strain of type SAT 2 of the virus of foot-and-mouth disease. Research in Veterinary Science 3, 357–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moosbrugger, G. A., Leunen, J., Mackowiak, C., Fontaine, J. & Roumianzeff, M. (1967). Etude sérologique et immunologique comparative de souches de virus aphteux de type ‘C’ isolées en Europe entre 1963 et 1966. Bulletin de l'office International des Epizooties 67, 711–29.Google Scholar
Morgan, D. O., McKercher, P. D. & Bachrach, H. L. (1970). Quantitation of the antigenicity and immunogenicity of purified foot-and-mouth disease virus for swine and steers. Applied Microbiology 20, 770–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mowat, G. N. (1972). Quantities of purified antigen required to immunize swine against foot-and-mouth disease. Bulletin de l'office International des Epizooties 77, 887–97.Google ScholarPubMed
Muntiu, N., Dohotaru, V., Bercan, A. & Tomescu, A. (1965). Cross-protection product in an attempt of quantitative antigenic differentiation of two foot-and-mouth disease virus strains type 0 in cattle. Bulletin de l'office International des Epizooties 63, 1627–41.Google Scholar
Munro, T. F. & Wooley, R. E. (1973). Neutralisation kinetics study of selected reoviruses. Infection and Immunity 8, 628–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pereira, H. G. & Tumova, B. (1967). Specific serum neutralization of the reactivating activity of influenza A2 viruses. Journal of General Virology 1, 131–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reed, L. J. & Muench, H. (1938). A simple method of estimating fifty percent endpoints. American Journal of Hygiene 27, 493–7.Google Scholar
Richter, F. A., Macpherson, L. W., Campbell, J. B. & Làbzoffsky, N. A. (1972). Studies on intratypic variants of Coxsackie B1 virus. Archiv für die gesamte Virusforschung 38, 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traub, E. & Möhlmann, H. (1946). Untersuchungen über immunologische Varianten der Typen A und B des Maul- und Klauenseuchenvirus. Berliner und Münchener Tierätztliche Wochenschrift 1, 1–5.Google Scholar
Ubertini, B., Nardelli, L., dal Prato, A., Panina, G. & Santero, G. (1964). Subtype variation of foot-and-mouth disease virus and vaccination. Wiener tierärztliche Monats-schrift 51, (Suppl.) 99–110.Google Scholar