Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T00:27:10.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of a waterless hand-hygiene preparation and soap-and-water hand washing to reduce coliforms on hands in animal exhibit settings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2006

M. A. DAVIS ,
H. SHENG ,
J. NEWMAN ,
D. D. HANCOCK  and
C. J. HOVDE
M. A. DAVIS
Affiliation:
University of Idaho, Department of Microbiology, Molecular Biology, and Biochemistry, Moscow, ID, USA
H. SHENG
Affiliation:
University of Idaho, Department of Microbiology, Molecular Biology, and Biochemistry, Moscow, ID, USA
J. NEWMAN
Affiliation:
Washington State University, Department of Human Development, Pullman, WA, USA
D. D. HANCOCK
Affiliation:
Washington State University, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Pullman, WA, USA
C. J. HOVDE
Affiliation:
University of Idaho, Department of Microbiology, Molecular Biology, and Biochemistry, Moscow, ID, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Outbreaks of enteric disease associated with exposure to live animals on exhibit have occurred with increasing frequency in recent years. Possibly the most important pathogen causing such outbreaks is Escherichia coli O157:H7, because of the serious illness it can cause. Hand hygiene is consistently protective against disease among persons exposed to animals implicated in these outbreaks. Livestock barns have limited hand-washing facilities, therefore a waterless hand-sanitizing gel would be a potentially preventive measure readily available to visitors and animal exhibitors. This study compared the reduction of bacterial counts on hands of animal exhibitors when soap and water was used or when an ethanol-based hand gel was used after animal handling. Participants were youth and adults involved with showing livestock. The sanitation methods were similar in reducing the total bacteria and coliform counts on the hands of the participants (Wilcoxon rank sum test P values 0·12 and 0·69 respectively).

Type
Short Report
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 134 , Issue 5 , October 2006 , pp. 1024 - 1028
Copyright
2006 Cambridge University Press