Introduction
Varicella, more commonly known as chickenpox, is caused by VZV, a herpes virus [Reference Ayoade and Kumar1]. The virus attacks the immune and the nervous systems and, after a primary varicella infection, can reactivate later causing herpes zoster (shingles). Even though the disease is more common in children, chickenpox causes more severe disease in adults, pregnant women, and immunocompromised persons. The infection may start as a mild fever and malaise and tends to form itchy blisters and scabs [Reference Ayoade and Kumar1]. The rash will develop on the face and torso and then gradually spread to the rest of the body, including legs, arms, and the scalp [2]. The contagious VZV that causes chickenpox spreads via direct contact and through inhalation of aerosols of the vesicular fluid of skin lesions from acute varicella or herpes zoster, and possibly through respiratory secretions that may be aerosolized [2]. Thus, unless the disease has already been developed or vaccination has been given, it is almost certain the disease will show up in the host.
Frequently, the immunization status of adult patients is not available or is incomplete [Reference Eltvedt, Poulsen, Winther and Von Linstow3]. In several states of the USA, although tested for immunity to varicella at the time of employment, HCWs are not required to get immunized to it [4]. Immunity to varicella should probably be mandated or non-mandatory strategies should be implemented in HCWs as they are in contact with patients who may be immunocompromised and therefore at risk of severe disease [ Reference Haviari, Bénet, Saadatian-Elahi, André, Loulergue and Vanhems5 ]. Immunizations of healthcare workers will help prevent the spread of communicable diseases such as varicella, as unvaccinated healthcare workers pose a risk of spreading such diseases to their colleagues and patients [Reference Yang6].
Case presentation
Here, we present a case of a 31-year-old intellectually disabled male patient, unimmunized for varicella, living previously with his elderly mother who functioned as his caregiver. He was hospitalized as he was unable to take care of himself when his mother was hospitalized. The patient then remained in the hospital for 80 days (from 10 January 2023 to 31 March 2023) due to challenges of a safe discharge. He was placed in a room with standard precautions which include hand hygiene, using gloves and surgical masks. He remained in the same room but had different roommates at various times. He had no physical contact with his roommates and neither had visitors. The same HCWs usually rendered care to him and his roommates. Around day 36, a HCW was exposed to one of his roommates with herpes zoster in lower lumbar dermatome. Although the lesions were in a covered area, the HCW had significant exposure due to close contact while rendering personal care to the patient. The roommate was immediately transferred to a different room with airborne precautions, but the HCW was not furloughed. The HCW developed varicella 18 days after that exposure, on day 54 of the patient’s hospitalization, and was furloughed thereafter with instructions to self-quarantine. 17 days afterwards, around day 71 of his hospital stay, the patient developed a low-grade fever, lack of appetite, and apathy (Tables 1:, 2:, 3). Subsequently, on or around day 73, staff noted the eruption of itchy, discrete, erythematous, pruritic, vesicular lesions on various parts of his body, suggestive of chickenpox (Figures 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6). He was placed in airborne precautions immediately until the lesions scabbed off. He was noted to have eruption of vesicular lesions in small crops involving his face, torso and extremities. Roughly, he was noted to have 30 lesions. The lesions were initially vesicular, few became pustular and started to crust by days 5–6, and nearly all lesions had crusted and scabbed off by day 9. He did not have any complications of varicella and had complete recovery. Serology was requested on day 8 after the rash and showed elevated varicella IgM and varicella zoster IgG. (Table 4) As the patient was discharged to a group home on day 9, we did not have an opportunity to monitor his fourfold IgG titre after an appropriate period of time. The time interval of exposure of the HCW to the patient with herpes zoster and development of varicella herself was approximately one incubation period. The time interval between the HCW developing varicella and our patient developing varicella was one more incubation period. This timeline and evolution of events suggest the fact that the transmission occurred from the patient’s roommate with herpes zoster to the presumptive unimmunized staff and subsequently to our unimmunized patient, suggesting a breach of infection control measures.
Abbreviation: g/dL, gram per decilitre; Hct, haematocrit; HgB, haemoglobin; mcL, microlitre; Plt, platelet; RBC, red blood cell count; WBC, white blood cell count.
Discussion
The varicella vaccine was introduced in 1995 and recommended to all children before the age of 5 years and in non-immune adults [Reference Wodi, Murthy, McNally, Cineas and Ault7]. It is recommended but not mandated for entry into schools and at the time of employment in healthcare settings. The Healthcare (formerly Hospital) Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) has encouraged any facility or organization that provides direct patient care to formulate a comprehensive vaccination policy for all Health Care Provider (HCP) [8]. Hospitalization due to varicella in the USA has reduced >90% as a result of vaccination programmes, reducing nosocomial transmission in turn [Reference Drees and Weber9]. However, patients’ vaccination status and immunity to communicable diseases such as varicella are not routinely asked or recorded during hospitalizations. Records obtained afterwards from our patient’s primary care physician indicated that the patient was not vaccinated for varicella and he had never been to a formal school due to his profound developmental disability with behavioural disturbances and hence missed another opportunity to be vaccinated. At the time this case report was written, the vaccination or immunity status of the healthcare worker who developed chickenpox was not accessible to us due to privacy protection policy at the local level.
Assessing the varicella immunity of the HCW who had exposure to the herpes zoster patient, furloughing the exposed HCW, and offering PEP with varicella zoster immunoglobulin (VZIg) if the evidence of lack of immunity was found would have prevented the further transmission of varicella to our patient in this healthcare setting [Reference Drees and Weber9]. Developing a case definition by the facility’s Infection Prevention Department, contact tracing, identifying and vaccinating susceptible HCWs with two doses of varicella vaccine are additional measures to prevent nosocomial transmission [Reference Singh, Pandya, Bhatti, Lathwal and Kumar10]. Widely, the rash of uncomplicated chickenpox is accurately recognized by HCWs [Reference Fergie, Pawaskar, Veeranki, Samant, Harley, MacEwan, Schwartz, Surati and Conway11]. The recognition of rash in the HCW allowed immediate intervention and quarantine, thus preventing the HCW’s contribution to disease transmission from the hospital to the community. Furthermore, the involvement of the Infection Prevention Department of the hospital and consultation with Infectious Disease specialists after recognition of the rash in our patient prevented a potential outbreak on that particular floor and the hospital in general [Reference Siegel, Rhinehart, Jackson and Chiarello12]. This event provided an opportunity to educate the hospital staff about herpes zoster and varicella, their potential for transmission, and the need to implement appropriate infection control measures in a timely manner [Reference Sydnor and Perl13, Reference Kim, Park, Choi and Lee15].
This raises the question of whether the practice of cohorting two different individuals in the same room with an unknown immunization status is rational. This also makes a case for individual rooms (solo rooms) for each hospitalized patient. The concerns of transmissibility between the roommates in hospitalized patients regardless of the 6 ft distance between the beds separated by a curtain, remain as they share the same healthcare workers assigned to their care. As HCWs are potentially responsible for the transmission of infections between two or more patients, establishing immunity of HCWs to vaccine-preventable communicable diseases like chickenpox (varicella) protects not only the individual HCW but also the patients who they render personal care to, thus having close contact with those patients [Reference Sydnor and Perl13]. Additionally, hospital-based HCWs have substantial physical contact with patients and differ significantly from those of community-based working adults, thus strengthening the need for immunity in HCWs to vaccine-preventable illnesses [Reference Jiang, Ng, Hou, Li, Tan, Ho and Chen14].
Conclusion
This case demonstrates that vaccine-preventable diseases can be transmitted in a healthcare setting and can be prevented by introducing measures such as establishing policies to mandate varicella immunity in addition to assessing for it at the time of employment of HCWs. Unimmunized HCWs should be offered vaccinations at the time of employment. Vaccination and/or immunity to vaccine-preventable disease in patients at the time of hospital admission should be documented. This will allow patients’ placement in rooms with appropriate cohorts with a similar immunity status and assignment of HCWs appropriately to the patients with a similar immunity status. Periodic education that both herpes zoster and varicella are transmissible to susceptible patients and staff alike, and heightened awareness of healthcare workers are also of utmost importance in recognizing a vaccine-preventable disease. Hospitals have to weigh their professional responsibility to protect their patients from vaccine-preventable illnesses while developing initial employment policies for HCWs and subsequent measures required to be taken after exposure of HCWs to patients with herpes zoster and chickenpox.
Data availability statement
-
• The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in StatPearls Publishing at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK448191/, reference 1.
-
• The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in InformedHealth.org at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK279621/, reference 2.
-
• The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in Human Vaccines and Immuno-therapeutics at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33905303/, reference 3.
-
• The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention at https://www2a.cdc.gov/vaccines/statevaccsApp/Administration.asp?statetmp=NJ#4, reference 4.
-
• The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in Hum Vaccin Immunother at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26291642/, reference 5.
-
• The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in BMC Infectious Diseases at https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-019-4,222-x, reference 6.
-
• The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in MMWR Morbidity Mortal Weekly Report at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36757872/, reference 7.
-
• The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in MMWR Morbidity Mortal Weekly Report at https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr6007.pdf, reference 8.
-
• The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in Journal of Infectious Diseases at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36265849/, reference 9.
-
• The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in Medical Journal Armed Forces India at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35463537/, reference 10.
-
• The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in PLoS One at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35749342/, reference 11.
-
• The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in Centers for Disease Control and Prevention at https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/guidelines/isolation/index.html, reference 12.
-
• The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in Vaccine at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24726251/, reference 13.
-
• The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in Journal of Hospital Infection at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2017.10.020, reference 14.
-
• The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in Journal of Korean Medical Sciences at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30181734/, reference 15.
Author contribution
Data curation: N.U.; Resources: N.U., K.U.; Software: N.U.; Project administration: V.N.; Supervision: V.N.; Conceptualization: S.U.; Writing – original draft: S.U.; Writing – review & editing: S.U., K.U., L.P.; Methodology: K.U, L.P.