Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T02:34:18.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bacterial contamination in a modern operating suite, 2. Effect of a zoning system on contamination of floors and other surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

A. Hambraeus ,
S. Bengtsson  and
G. Laurell
A. Hambraeus
Affiliation:
Institute of Clinical Bacteriology, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
S. Bengtsson
Affiliation:
Institute of Clinical Bacteriology, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
G. Laurell
Affiliation:
Institute of Clinical Bacteriology, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this investigation the bacterial contamination of surfaces such as walls and floors in a modern operating suite, together with surfaces of lamps in the operating theatres, and the clogs worn by staff, was studied. Counts of colony-forming units were made on impression plates containing blood-agar with Tween 80 for total bacterial counts, Baird Parker medium with egg yolk and tellurite for Staphylococcus aureus and trypticase peptone agar with neomycin and polymyxin for Clostridium spp.

The areas examined were divided into the patients' route to the operating theatre, the staff's route, and the central area containing the operating rooms, anaesthetic rooms, and exit and scrub-up areas. In the patients' route counts of total organisms ranged from about 10 000 to 30 000/m2 for Staph. aureus the range was from 70 to 540/m2. In the staff's route the highest count was about 70000/m2 in the dressing area, and the numbers of Staph. aureus were about the same as along the patients' route. In the inner zone the counts were somewhat lower for both total organisms and Staph. aureus. Total counts on the floor from all areas of the inner zone were significantly higher just before the second operation than before the first operation on the same day. The total and Staph. aureus counts on walls, floors and lamps were the same after clean operations as after operations classified as ‘contaminated’ or ‘dirty’.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 80 , Issue 1 , February 1978 , pp. 57 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

References

REFERENCES

Ayliffe, S. A., Babb, J. R., Collins, B. J. & Lowbury, E. J. L. (1969). Transfer areas and clean zones in operating suites. Journal of Hygiene 67, 417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ayliffe, S. A. J., Collins, B. J. & Lowbury, E. J. L. (1966). Cleaning and disinfection of hospital floors. British Medical Journal ii, 442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayliffe, S. A. J. & Lowbury, E. J. L. (1969). Sources of gas gangrene in hospital. British Medical Journal i, 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babb, J. B., Lilly, H. A. & Lowbury, E. J. L. (1963). Cleaning of hospital floors with oiled mops. Journal of Hygiene 61, 393.Google ScholarPubMed
Bate, J. G. (1961). Bacteriological investigation of exhaust air from hospital vacuum cleaners. Lancet i, 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finegold, S. M., Sweeney, E. E., Saylor, B. W., Brady, D. & Miller, L. G. (1962). Hospital floor decontamination: controlled blind studies in evaluation of germicides. Antimocrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, p. 250.Google Scholar
Froud, P. J., Alder, V. G. & Gillespie, W. A. (1966). Contaminated areas in operating theatres. Lancet ii, 961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isolation Techniques for use in Hospitals (1970). U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare. Public Health Service Publication No. 2054.Google Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L. & Lilly, H. A. (1958). The sources of hospital infection of wounds with Clostridium welchii. Journal of Hygiene 56, 169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petersen, J. N., Marshall, S. N. & Collins, P. E. (1973). Why wash walls in hospital isolation rooms? Health Laboratory Science 10, 23.Google ScholarPubMed
Report of the committee on Control of Cross Infection (1962). Design and ventilation of operating room suites for control of infection and comfort. Lancet ii, 945.Google Scholar
Sewitt, S. (1953). Gas gangrene infection in an operating theatre. Lancet ii, 1121.Google Scholar
van de Ende, M., Lurk, D. & Edward, D. G. (1940). Reduction of dustborne bacteria by treating floors. Lancet ii, 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Versley, D. & Michaelson, G. S. (1964). Application of a surface sampling technique to the evaluation of the bacteriological effectiveness of certain housekeeping procedures. Health Laboratory Science 1, 107.Google Scholar
Williams, R. E. O., Blowers, R., Garrod, L. P. & Shooter, R. A. (1966). Hospital Infections. Causes and Prevention, 2nd ed.London: Lloyd-Luke Ltd.Google Scholar
Wypkema, W. & Alder, V. G. (1962). Hospital cross-infection and dirty walls. Lancet ii, 1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar