Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:24:57.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessing the social and environmental determinants of pertussis epidemics in Queensland, Australia: a Bayesian spatio-temporal analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2017

X. HUANG
Affiliation:
School of Public Health and Social Work, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
S. LAMBERT
Affiliation:
UQ Child Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia Communicable Diseases Branch, Department of Health, Queensland Government, Brisbane, Australia
C. LAU
Affiliation:
UQ Child Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
R. J. SOARES MAGALHAES
Affiliation:
UQ Child Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia School of Veterinary Sciences, University of Queensland, Gatton, Australia
J. MARQUESS
Affiliation:
Communicable Diseases Branch, Department of Health, Queensland Government, Brisbane, Australia
M. RAJMOKAN
Affiliation:
Communicable Diseases Branch, Department of Health, Queensland Government, Brisbane, Australia
G. MILINOVICH
Affiliation:
School of Public Health and Social Work, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
W. HU*
Affiliation:
School of Public Health and Social Work, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
*
*Author for correspondence: Dr W. Hu, School of Public Health and Social Work, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. (Email: [email protected]).
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Pertussis epidemics have displayed substantial spatial heterogeneity in countries with high socioeconomic conditions and high vaccine coverage. This study aims to investigate the relationship between pertussis risk and socio-environmental factors on the spatio-temporal variation underlying pertussis infection. We obtained daily case numbers of pertussis notifications from Queensland Health, Australia by postal area, for the period January 2006 to December 2012. A Bayesian spatio-temporal model was used to quantify the relationship between monthly pertussis incidence and socio-environmental factors. The socio-environmental factors included monthly mean minimum temperature (MIT), monthly mean vapour pressure (VAP), Queensland school calendar pattern (SCP), and socioeconomic index for area (SEIFA). An increase in pertussis incidence was observed from 2006 to 2010 and a slight decrease from 2011 to 2012. Spatial analyses showed pertussis incidence across Queensland postal area to be low and more spatially homogeneous during 2006–2008; incidence was higher and more spatially heterogeneous after 2009. The results also showed that the average decrease in monthly pertussis incidence was 3·1% [95% credible interval (CrI) 1·3–4·8] for each 1 °C increase in monthly MIT, while average increase in monthly pertussis incidences were 6·2% (95% CrI 0·4–12·4) and 2% (95% CrI 1–3) for SCP periods and for each 10-unit increase in SEIFA, respectively. This study demonstrated that pertussis transmission is significantly associated with MIT, SEIFA, and SCP. Mapping derived from this work highlights the potential for future investigation and areas for focusing future control strategies.

Type
Original Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

INTRODUCTION

Pertussis (whooping cough) is a highly contagious respiratory disease caused by the bacterium Bordetella pertussis and constitutes a global public health problem [1]. Pertussis is endemic throughout the world [1Reference Tejpratap, Murphy and Moran3] and the WHO estimates that 50 million cases and 300 000 deaths occur annually [4]. Although vaccination reduces infection risk, pertussis remains a key cause of morbidity and mortality, with case-fatality rates in developing countries reported to be up to 4% [4]. In recent years, an increase in number of pertussis cases in adolescents and adults has been reported globally [1, Reference Wood and McIntyre5, Reference Schellekens, von König and Gardner6]. Australia has had a pertussis vaccination programme in place for decades, with high national coverage. Despite this, pertussis is still common in Australia, with an average of 17 676 cases annually over the past 10 years. Furthermore, significant increases in pertussis incidence have been observed over the last decade, particularly in adolescents and the elderly [Reference Senanayake2, Reference Wood and McIntyre5, Reference Cagney7, Reference Jackson and Rohani8], culminating in a large, nationwide outbreak that commenced in 2009 [Reference Lam9]. Previous research indicates that waning immunity, transition from whole-cell pertussis vaccines to acellular pertussis vaccines, increasing use of a more sensitive diagnostic test in PCR, and evolution of B. pertussis might be the causes for increase in the outbreaks of pertussis in Australia [Reference Spokes, Quinn and McAnulty10Reference Sheridan13].

Previous studies have mainly focused on the effects of vaccination, herd immunity, pertussis toxin, and evolution of the bacterium on the epidemiology of pertussis [Reference Broutin14Reference Campbell17]. Pertussis epidemics have previously been associated with population structure, social and biological factors and herd immunity [Reference Jackson and Rohani8]. However, epidemics have shown substantial heterogeneity between countries with similar socioeconomic conditions and vaccination programmes [Reference Jackson and Rohani8]. Some studies have suggested that while current vaccination strategies may decrease clinical pertussis cases, they are not able to fully control the circulation of pertussis [Reference Schellekens, von König and Gardner6, Reference Jackson and Rohani8].

The epidemiology of pertussis is complex and remains to be fully elucidated. Understanding the social and environmental drivers of pertussis outbreaks is integral to predicting future outbreaks and developing effective intervention measures (including vaccination strategies). Typically, pertussis is spread via airborne transmission; infection occurs when susceptible individuals are exposed to aerosolized droplets from pertussis-infected patients [Reference Tejpratap, Murphy and Moran3]. Pertussis epidemics have previously been reported to exhibit seasonality [Reference Mooi16, Reference Fine and Clarkson18, Reference Skowronski19]. The effectiveness of airborne transmission is influenced by droplet size and environmental conditions, such as air flows, temperature and evaporation [Reference Tang20, Reference Xie21]. Understanding the social and environmental predictors of pertussis outbreaks could be useful for predicting future outbreaks and for developing and implementing effective intervention measures to minimize the impact of these outbreaks.

Current understanding of the role of socio-environmental factors on pertussis transmission is limited. This study aims to investigate the relationship between pertussis risk and socio-environmental factors on the spatio-temporal variation underlying pertussis in Queensland, Australia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study site and data collection

The state of Queensland is located in the northeast of Australia. It is Australia's second largest state by land mass, spanning ~1·9 million km2. Climate conditions vary markedly across the state. For example, low minimum temperatures are typically observed in the inland southeast; dry and hot weather conditions occurs in the inland west; a hot humid summer presents in the tropical far north of Queensland; and warm temperate conditions occur on the coastal regions [22].

Australia provides free pertussis vaccines to children aged 0–15 years and to pregnant women. People receive a pertussis immunization through visiting their local doctor or immunization provider. Most of these immunization encounters occur without payment of a consultation fee [23].

Data on the number of confirmed pertussis cases for each postal area between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2012 were provided by Queensland Health (the Queensland State government health authority). Postal areas are approximations of Australia's postcodes, produced by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). Postal areas are widely used by researchers in Australia because they are readily available in many datasets [Reference Chou, Clements and Thomson24Reference Goltsman26]. Data on population size and socioeconomic index for area (SEIFA) for each postal area were obtained from the ABS [27]. The population size at each postal area was based on the 2011 Census data in Australia [28]. A continuous value of SEIFA is used to describe the average socioeconomic characteristics at different locations, including education, occupation and wealth [29]. Data on daily minimum temperature by month (MIT; °C) and monthly daily vapour pressure (VAP) (hPa) for each postcode area were obtained from the National Computational Infrastructure between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2012 [30].

Descriptive analysis

To better understand pertussis epidemics in Queensland, this study provided the statistical summary of the pertussis data and the temporal patterns of monthly pertussis incidences by the three age groups (0–14, 15–64, ⩾65 years).

Statistical modelling

A Bayesian spatio-temporal model was developed to examine the effects of socio-environmental factors on the pertussis incidence and the spatio-temporal variability of pertussis epidemics. We denote y ij as the observed monthly pertussis cases at location i and month j (i = 1,  , 424; j = 1, … , 84) between January 2006 and December 2012. y ij was assumed to have a Poisson distribution:

$$y_{ij} \,{\sim}\, {\rm Poisson} \left( {\rho_{ij} E_i} \right),$$

where ρ ij represents the relative risk of the monthly pertussis counts at location i and time j. E i is the age-adjusted expected number of pertussis cases at location i. E i was calculated as:

$$E_i = \sum\limits_{g = 1}^{g = 3} {P_{ig}} R{}_{qg};\,R_{qg} = \displaystyle{{O_{qg}} \over {P_{qg}}}. $$

where P qg and P ig represent the age-specific populations in the whole of Queensland and at postal area i for the g age group, respectively; O qg and R qg are the observed numbers of pertussis cases and the mean incidence rate of pertussis for the g age group in the whole of Queensland during 2006–2012, respectively. Age-adjusted expected numbers of pertussis cases were used in the method because the different age structure in different postal areas might affect the likelihood of pertussis infection [Reference Waller and Gotway31].

The log relative risk for the spatio-temporal model was thus given by:

(1) $$\eqalign{\log (\rho _{ij} ) & = \beta _0 + \beta _1 \times {\rm MIT} + \beta_{2} \times {\rm VAP} + \beta _3 \cr & \quad \times {\rm SEIFA} + \beta _4 \times {\rm SCP} + t_j + u_i + v_i \cr & \quad + \varphi _{ij}}, $$

Here β 0 is the intercept; β 1, β 2, β 3 and β 4 are the coefficients for MIT, VAP, SEIFA, and Queensland school calendar pattern (SCP), respectively; t j captures the time trend over the study period; u i is spatially structured heterogeneity to capture residual spatial autocorrelation in the data; ν i represents unstructured heterogeneity (no spatial correlation) to capture measure error or micro-scale variation at location i, where v i has a normal distribution with mean zero and precision τ v  ~ gamma (0·5,0·0005); ϕ ij describes the spatio-temporal variation and is assumed to be a normal distribution with mean zero and precision τ ϕ , τϕ  ~ gamma (0·001,0·001).

In the study we assumed that the variable SCP was a categorical variable with two categories: SCP = 1 representing the months during the school term, and SCP = 0 representing the months during school holidays. The conditional autoregressive (CAR) model was used to describe the random effect u i as a function of the first-order neighbours u −i at site i. The conditional distribution of u i |u i is given by:

$$u_i \left \vert {u_{ - i}} \right. \,{\sim}\, N \left( {\displaystyle{{\sum\limits_{s = 1}^m {w_{is}} u_s} \over {w_{i +}}}, \displaystyle{{\tau _u^2} \over {w_{i +}}}} \right),$$

where u i has a normal distribution with precision τ u , a gamma distributions τ u ~gamma (0·5,0·0005), and conditional weighted mean given by the average of the first-order neighbours u −i without u i . Let u −i  = [u 1, u 2, … , u i−1, ui+ 1, … , u m ]. A symmetric n × n matrix W of spatial weights with elements w is and $w_{i +} = \sum\nolimits_{s = 1}^m {w_{is}} $ is used to describe the local neighbourhood relationship, where w is  = 1 if sites i and s are neighbours, and w is  = 0 otherwise [Reference Besag, York and Mollie32]. Moreover, the above CAR model was also used to perform the temporally correlated random effect t j with a one-dimensional random walk prior and a neighbourhood structure of the immediately previous month and subsequent month. Thus, t j is assumed to be a normal distribution with precision τ t ; let τ t be a gamma distribution τ t  ~ gamma (0·01,0·01).

To ensure the spatio-temporal model [i.e. equation (1)] is appropriate for describing the pertussis data in the study, six reduced models underlying risk factors were developed to detect whether model goodness of fit can be improved when including different random effects of u i , vi, ti and φ ij . All models were compared using the deviance information criterion (DIC). The model was run 150 000 Markov Chain Monte Carlo iterations with the first 30 000 iterations discarded as burn-in using WinBUGS software v. 1.4 (http://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/software/bugs/the-bugs-project-winbugs/).

RESULTS

The average of the monthly incidence of pertussis was 0·1/1000 population (range 0·02–0·25/1000) in Queensland during the 2006–2012 study period. The observed age-specific monthly incidences in Table 1 indicate that children aged 0–14 years had the highest monthly incidence with an average of 0·15/1000 (range 0·01–0·53/1000) per month. Of the reported pertussis cases, 29·2% (age-specific incidence rates 171/100 000 per year), 55·5% (age-specific incidence rates 100/100 000 per year) and 15·3% (age-specific incidence rates 143/100 000 per year) were aged 0–14 years, 15–64 years and ⩾65 years, respectively. The largest number of annual cases was observed in 2011 and the smallest number in 2007. Monthly case numbers peaked in winter in 2006 and 2007, in summer in 2008, in autumn in 2009 and in spring during 2010–2012. Figure 1 shows an increasing trend in observed monthly incidence of pertussis in Queensland from 2008 to 2010. The trends in the observed age-specific monthly incidences were different between the three age groups (Fig. 1). A notable increase in incidence occurred in the 0–14 years age group from 2008 onwards. An increasing trend was also observed in people aged ⩾65 years, while a slight decreasing trend seen in the 15–64 years age group from 2010 to 2012. The average of the observed monthly incidence of pertussis cases for each postal area (range 0–47·5/1000 local people) also exhibited heterogeneity across Queensland (Fig. 2). The spatial clustering of high observed incidences mostly occurred in the southwest and the southeast of Queensland (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1. The temporal patterns of the monthly incidence of confirmed pertussis cases in the three age groups and Queensland (January 2006 to December 2012).

Fig. 2. Average of observed monthly pertussis incidence by Queensland postal area.

Table 1. The monthly pertussis incidences (per 1000 population) and variables for Queensland (January 2006–December 2012).

The full model, including the four random effects (u, v, t, ϕ), exhibited the best fit for the pertussis data due to the lowest DIC value compared to the six reduced models (Table 2). The full model showed an average decrease in monthly pertussis cases of 3·1% [95% credible interval (CrI) 1·3–4·8] for each 1 °C increase in monthly MIT, while average increases in monthly pertussis cases were 6·2% (95% CrI 0·4–12·4) and 2% (95% CrI 1–3) for school term (SCP = 1) and for each 10-unit increase in SEIFA, respectively (Table 3). No significant relationship was found between pertussis risk and VAP.

Table 2. Model comparison for relative risk of monthly pertussis counts underlying socio-environmental factors and different random effects over the six models

Table 3. Bayesian Poisson regression models of pertussis, Queensland, Australia, 2006–2012

The temporally correlated effect [exp(t)] showed an increase in pertussis risk from 2006 to 2010 and a slight decrease from 2011 to 2012 (Fig. 3). Strong spatial variation in relative risk was observed across Queensland (Fig. 4). The spatially correlated random effect showed that the posterior mean of spatial variation [exp(u)] in relative risk ranged from 0·6 to 3·2 across the postal areas. The spatially correlated effect also identified the regions with the spatial clustering of pertussis risk unexplained by the full model. The four random effects might explain the effects of unobserved risk factors.

Fig. 3. Time trend in posterior mean relative risk of pertussis (solid line) with 95% credible intervals (dashed lines) from the spatio-temporal model during the study period in Queensland.

Fig. 4. The spatial distribution of structured and unstructured heterogeneities in posterior mean relative risk across Queensland.

For simplicity, the estimated monthly relative risks (ρ ij ) were aggregated by each year to illustrate the spatio-temporal patterns in pertussis epidemics over time across Queensland. There was strong evidence of spatial and temporal variability of relative risk after adjustment for socio-environmental factors (Fig. 5). Local relative risks were low and homogeneous across Queensland between 2006 and 2008. However, from 2009 onwards, relative risk and heterogeneity across Queensland increased (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5. The spatio-temporal distributions of posterior mean relative risk over time across Queensland.

DISCUSSION

This study found a significant negative association between the pertussis incidence and MIT in Queensland. Although pertussis is spread by aerosol droplets, the effect of environmental factors on the survival of B. pertussis is still not fully understood [Reference Mielcarek33]. Pertussis cases have previously been reported to increase in winter [Reference Mooi16]. A New Zealand study also found a negative relationship between minimum temperature and pertussis [Reference Gosai, Salinger and Dirks34]. This is biologically plausible as temperature variation might influence host susceptibility and the survival of the pathogen in the environment [Reference Grassly and Fraser35, Reference Dowell36]. Our study demonstrates that a decrease in temperature might lead to increase in pertussis transmission.

SCP and SEFIA were also demonstrated to influence transmission of pertussis in this study. It is not surprising that periods of school attendance were associated with increased pertussis cases as it leads to crowding of susceptible individuals, increasing the risk of pertussis spread between school children and subsequently to their families [Reference Mooi16, Reference Earn37, Reference Brennan38]. A high score of local SEIFA is typically correlated with a lower unemployment rate and greater access to economic and social resources [27]. While the increased risk in pertussis associated with a single unit increase in SEIFA was modest, it may indicate that as SEIFA increases, opportunity for exposure to others, and therefore, risk of pertussis exposure, through work and social events increases.

A significantly increased trend in pertussis incidence was shown from 2008. Pertussis vaccination plays a significant role in reduction of pertussis infections [Reference Jackson and Rohani8]. Pertussis vaccine coverage in Queensland is very high with an average of 92% for children having received the primary course by their first birthday and 94·5% by the second birthday [39]. The national immunization programme provides publically funded vaccines to children aged 0–15 years in Australia [40]. However, a significant increase in pertussis incidence was observed in children aged 0–14 years and people aged ⩾65 years. Our result suggests that future studies need to investigate the effect of risk factors in pertussis transmission between different age groups. This is particularly relevant in light of recent publications that suggest differences over time in vaccine effectiveness between the diphtheria-tetanus-whole-cell pertussis vaccine and the diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccine that replaced the whole-cell vaccine as part of the publically funded schedule in Queensland in 1999 [Reference Sheridan13, Reference Sheridan41].

The maps of the spatio-temporal patterns in the posterior mean relative risks depict strong heterogeneity after adjusting for socio-environmental factors and random effects. Although there is the same immunization programme and high vaccine coverage across Queensland, there was substantial spatial variation in incidence during pertussis epidemics (Fig. 4). Pertussis transmission dynamics is complex and is driven by a combined effect of population immunity, population structure, socio-environmental, and biological factors [Reference Jackson and Rohani8]. Hence, it is possible that different locations might experience different epidemiological characteristics of pertussis [Reference Choisy and Rohani42]. The derived maps may support a better understanding of evolutionary dynamics of pertussis. Moreover, the areas with high relative risk also presented large uncertainty, which might provide clues for further investigating pertussis transmission.

Our study is the first attempt to develop a predictive model based on socio-ecological factors for the control and prevention of pertussis in Queensland, Australia. From this work we plan to develop an ongoing and comprehensive database to facilitate prevention of pertussis based on an ensemble of socio-ecological and disease surveillance data. The results of this study will inform future research into the social determinants of pertussis and control in high-risk areas.

Some limitations of the study should be acknowledged. First, the potential confounding factors such as vaccination coverage and uptake, population immunity and travel-to-work patterns were not available in the current study. However, high pertussis vaccination coverage across Queensland could reduce estimated bias. Second, the data might not include all pertussis cases, particularly those with mild clinical symptoms or those who are asymptomatic. Moreover, data on weather at postcode area level were not available after December 2012 at National Computational Infrastructure, Australia. Therefore, we could not include data after 2012 in this study, which may affect interpretation of our results. Finally, this study was not able to take into account the effect that changes in general practitioner testing behaviour (increased testing) [Reference Kaczmarek12] or changes in diagnostic approaches for pertussis (PCR vs. serology) may have had on the observed epidemiology of pertussis in Queensland [Reference Kaczmarek, Ware and Lambert11]. Moreover, further analysis needs to add detailed personal information to improve our understanding of pertussis epidemics.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that pertussis transmission is significantly associated with MIT, SEIFA and SCP. The spatio-temporal analysis provided evidence of substantial variation in the spatio-temporal distribution of pertussis risk in different postal areas. The results also reveal that the pertussis epidemics are heterogeneous under the same national immunization programme across Queensland. The derived maps highlight the potential areas for future investigation and interventions.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the Queensland Department of Health, Australian National Computational Infrastructure, and the Australian Bureau of Statistics for providing the data on laboratory-confirmed pertussis cases, climate, and population growth, respectively. This research was supported by a QCMRI_QUT collaborative seeding grant. W.H. is supported by an ARC future fellowship (FT140101216).

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

References

REFERENCES

1. WHO. Pertussis vaccines: WHO position paper – August 2015. vol. 90, WHO, 2015, 433–460.Google Scholar
2. Senanayake, S. Pertussis in Australia today: a disease of adolescents and adults that can kill infants. Australian family physician 2007; 36: 51.Google Scholar
3. Tejpratap, T, Murphy, TV, Moran, J. National Immunization Program C: Recommended Antimicrobial Agents for the Treatment and Postexposure Prophylaxis of Pertussis, 2005, CDC Guidelines. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Recommendations and Reports 2005; 54: 116.Google Scholar
5. Wood, N, McIntyre, P. Pertussis: review of epidemiology, diagnosis, management and prevention. Paediatric Respiratory Reviews 2008; 9: 201212.Google Scholar
6. Schellekens, J, von König, C-HW, Gardner, P. Pertussis sources of infection and routes of transmission in the vaccination era. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 2005; 24: S19S24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Cagney, M, et al. The seroepidemiology of pertussis in Australia during an epidemic period. Epidemiology and Infection 2006; 134: 12081216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Jackson, D, Rohani, P. Perplexities of pertussis: recent global epidemiological trends and their potential causes. Epidemiology and Infection 2014; 142: 672684.Google Scholar
9. Lam, C, et al. Rapid increase in pertactin-deficient Bordetella pertussis isolates, Australia. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2014; 20: 626.Google Scholar
10. Spokes, PJ, Quinn, HE, McAnulty, JM. Review of the 2008–2009 pertussis epidemic in NSW: notifications and hospitalisations. New South Wales Public Health Bulletin 2010; 21: 167173.Google Scholar
11. Kaczmarek, M, Ware, R, Lambert, S. The contribution of PCR testing to influenza and pertussis notifications in Australia. Epidemiology and Infection 2016; 144: 306314.Google Scholar
12. Kaczmarek, MC, et al. Sevenfold rise in likelihood of pertussis test requests in a stable set of Australian general practice encounters, 2000–2011. Medical Journal of Australia 2013; 198: 624628.Google Scholar
13. Sheridan, SL, et al. Number and order of whole cell pertussis vaccines in infancy and disease protection. Journal of the American Medical Association 2012; 308: 454456.Google Scholar
14. Broutin, H, et al. Impact of vaccination and birth rate on the epidemiology of pertussis: a comparative study in 64 countries. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 2010; 277: 32393245.Google ScholarPubMed
15. Octavia, S, et al. Newly emerging clones of Bordetella pertussis carrying prn2 and ptxP3 alleles implicated in Australian pertussis epidemic in 2008–2010. Journal of Infectious Diseases 2012; 205: 12201224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Mooi, FR, et al. Bordetella pertussis strains with increased toxin production associated with pertussis resurgence. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2009; 15: 1206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Campbell, P, et al. Increased population prevalence of low pertussis toxin antibody levels in young children preceding a record pertussis epidemic in Australia. PLoS ONE 2012; 7: e35874.Google Scholar
18. Fine, PE, Clarkson, JA. Seasonal influences on pertussis. International Journal of Epidemiology 1986; 15: 237247.Google Scholar
19. Skowronski, DM, et al. The changing age and seasonal profile of pertussis in Canada. Journal of Infectious Diseases 2002; 185: 14481453.Google Scholar
20. Tang, J, et al. Factors involved in the aerosol transmission of infection and control of ventilation in healthcare premises. Journal of Hospital Infection 2006; 64: 100114.Google Scholar
21. Xie, X, et al. How far droplets can move in indoor environments–revisiting the Wells evaporation–falling curve. Indoor Air 2007; 17: 211225.Google Scholar
22. Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology. Climate of Queensland, 2014.Google Scholar
23. Australian Government Department of Health. Immunise Australia Program. Whooping cough (pertussis) (http://www.immunise.health.gov.au/internet/immunise/publishing.nsf/content/immunise-pertussis).Google Scholar
24. Chou, MP, Clements, AC, Thomson, RM. A spatial epidemiological analysis of nontuberculous mycobacterial infections in Queensland, Australia. BMC Infectious Diseases 2014; 14: 279.Google Scholar
25. Furuya-Kanamori, L, et al. A population-based spatio-temporal analysis of Clostridium difficile infection in Queensland, Australia over a 10-year period. Journal of Infection 2014; 69: 447455.Google Scholar
26. Goltsman, D, et al. Geospatial and epidemiological analysis of severe burns in New South Wales by residential postcodes. Burns 2014; 40: 670682.Google Scholar
27. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Socio-ecomomic indexes for areas (SEIFA) 2011.Google Scholar
28. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2011 Census QuickStats (http://www.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2011/quickstat/3?opendocument&navpos=220). Accessed 2 June 2014.Google Scholar
29. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Census of Population and Housing: Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA), Australia, 2011 (http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/DetailsPage/2033.0.55.0012011?OpenDocume), 2013.Google Scholar
30. eMAST. National computational infrastructure. Observations. (http://www.emast.org.au), 2014.Google Scholar
31. Waller, LA, Gotway, CA. Applied Spatial Statistics for Public Health Data, vol. 368. John Wiley & Sons, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. Besag, J, York, J, Mollie, A. Bayesian image restoration, with two applications in spatial statistics. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 1991; 43: 159.Google Scholar
33. Mielcarek, N, et al. Live attenuated B. pertussis as a single-dose nasal vaccine against whooping cough. PLoS Pathogens 2006; 2: e65.Google ScholarPubMed
34. Gosai, A, Salinger, J, Dirks, K. Climate and respiratory disease in Auckland, New Zealand. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 2009; 33: 521526.Google Scholar
35. Grassly, NC, Fraser, C. Seasonal infectious disease epidemiology. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 2006; 273: 25412550.Google Scholar
36. Dowell, SF. Seasonal variation in host susceptibility and cycles of certain infectious diseases. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2001; 7: 369.Google Scholar
37. Earn, DJ, et al. Effects of school closure on incidence of pandemic influenza in Alberta, Canada. Annals of Internal Medicine 2012; 156: 173181.Google Scholar
38. Brennan, M, et al. Evidence for transmission of pertussis in schools, Massachusetts, 1996: epidemiologic data supported by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis studies. Journal of Infectious Diseases 2000; 181: 210215.Google Scholar
39. Australian Government Department of Health. Immunisation coverage annual reports (http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/cda-immunanrep.htm), 2014.Google Scholar
40. Australian Government Department of Health. National immunisation program schedlule (http://www.health.gov.au/internet/immunise/publishing.nsf/Content/nips), 2015.Google Scholar
41. Sheridan, SL, et al. Waning vaccine immunity in teenagers primed with whole cell and acellular pertussis vaccine: recent epidemiology. Expert Review of Vaccines 2014; 13: 10811106.Google Scholar
42. Choisy, M, Rohani, P. Changing spatial epidemiology of pertussis in continental USA. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 2012; 279: 45744581.Google ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. The temporal patterns of the monthly incidence of confirmed pertussis cases in the three age groups and Queensland (January 2006 to December 2012).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Average of observed monthly pertussis incidence by Queensland postal area.

Figure 2

Table 1. The monthly pertussis incidences (per 1000 population) and variables for Queensland (January 2006–December 2012).

Figure 3

Table 2. Model comparison for relative risk of monthly pertussis counts underlying socio-environmental factors and different random effects over the six models

Figure 4

Table 3. Bayesian Poisson regression models of pertussis, Queensland, Australia, 2006–2012

Figure 5

Fig. 3. Time trend in posterior mean relative risk of pertussis (solid line) with 95% credible intervals (dashed lines) from the spatio-temporal model during the study period in Queensland.

Figure 6

Fig. 4. The spatial distribution of structured and unstructured heterogeneities in posterior mean relative risk across Queensland.

Figure 7

Fig. 5. The spatio-temporal distributions of posterior mean relative risk over time across Queensland.