Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:22:43.055Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Antigenic analysis of Haemophilus ducreyi by Western blotting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

D. Abeck ,
A. P. Johnson  and
D. Taylor-Robinson
D. Abeck
Affiliation:
Division of Sexually Transmitted Diseases, MRC Clinical Research Centre, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex, HA1 3UJ
A. P. Johnson
Affiliation:
Division of Sexually Transmitted Diseases, MRC Clinical Research Centre, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex, HA1 3UJ
D. Taylor-Robinson
Affiliation:
Division of Sexually Transmitted Diseases, MRC Clinical Research Centre, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex, HA1 3UJ
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Twenty-one strains of Haemophilus ducreyi were analysed by Western blotting using two antisera produced in mice. Common antigens of molecular weights 58, 46, 41, 28, 22 and 16 kDa were detected in all the strains. The antigens were protein in nature, since they could not be detected in whole-cell lysates which had been treated with proteinase K. The H. ducreyi strains showed antigenic cross-reactivity with strains of H. influenzae and H. parainfluenzae, but showed minimal or no cross-reactivity with seven other species of bacteria.

Type
Special Article
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 101 , Issue 1 , August 1988 , pp. 151 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

References

REFERENCES

Abeck, D. & Johnson, A. P. (1987). Identification of surface-exposed proteins of Haemophilus ducreyi. FEMS Microbiology Letters 44, 49–51.Google Scholar
Abeck, D., Johnson, A. P., Wall, R. A. & Shah, L. (1987). Haemophilus ducreyi produces rough lipopolysaccharide. FEMS Microbiology Letters 42, 159–161.Google Scholar
Boustouller, Y. L., Johnson, A. P. & Taylor-Robinson, D. (1986). Detection of a species-specific antigen of Gardnerella vaginalis by Western blot analysis. Journal of General Microbiology 132, 1969–1973.Google Scholar
Hammond, G. W., Lian, C. J., Wilt, J. C. & Ronald, A. R. (1978). Antimicrobial susceptibility of Haemophilus ducreyi. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 13, 608–612.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, P. J. & Brown, T. M. (1983). Morphological heterogeneity among Salmonella lipopolysaccharide chemotypes in silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. Journal of Bacteriology 154, 269–277.Google Scholar
Odumeru, J. A., Ronald, A. R. & Albritton, W. L. (1983). Characterisation of cell proteins of Haemophilus ducreyi by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Journal of Infectious Diseases 148, 710–714.Google Scholar
Saunders, J. M. & Folds, J. D. (1986). Immunoblot analysis of antigens associated with Haemophilus ducreyi using serum from immunised rabbits. Genitourinary Medicine 62, 321–328.Google Scholar
Smith, H. (1977). Microbial surfaces in relation to pathogenicity. Bacteriological Reviews 41, 475–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, D. N., Echeverria, P., Hanchalay, S., Pitarangsi, C., Slootmans, L. & Piot, P. (1985). Antimicrobial susceptibility and characterisation of outer membrane proteins of Haemophilus ducreyi isolated in Thailand. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 21, 442–444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Towbin, H., Strehelin, T. & Gordon, J. (1979). Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 79, 4350–4354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar