Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:00:34.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis of a hepatitis C screening programme for US veterans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2005

I. A. ZUNIGA
Affiliation:
Department of Preventive Medicine, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, USA
J. J. CHEN
Affiliation:
Department of Preventive Medicine, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, USA
D. S. LANE
Affiliation:
Department of Preventive Medicine, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, USA
J. ALLMER
Affiliation:
Northport VA Medical Center, East Northport, NY, USA
V. E. JIMENEZ-LUCHO
Affiliation:
Northport VA Medical Center, East Northport, NY, USA Division of Infectious Diseases, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This study analyses a screening programme for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection among US veterans in a suburban Veterans Affairs Medical Center, in New York. This is the first study examining all 11 potential risk factors listed in the 2001 National U.S. Veterans Health Administration Screening Guidelines. A retrospective study was conducted of 5400 veterans ‘at risk’ of HCV, identified through a questionnaire in this institution's primary-care outpatient departments between 1 October 2001 and 31 December 2003. Multivariate logistic regression models were built to identify independent predictors of infection. Of 2282 veterans tested for HCV, 4·6% were confirmed by HCV PCR to be HCV infected. In the multivariate model developed, injection drug use, blood transfusion before 1992, service during the Vietnam era, tattoo, and a history of abnormal liver function tests were independent predictors of HCV infection. Our data support considering a more targeted screening approach that includes five of the 11 risk factors.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2005 Cambridge University Press

Footnotes

This study was presented in part at the 2004 Annual Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America in Boston, MA, USA.