Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:00:24.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Investigation into the Acid-fast Bacteria found in Human Faeces with Special Reference to their Presence in Cases of Tuberculosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

D. Moore Alexander
D. Moore Alexander
Affiliation:
Pathologist, Royal Southern Hospital, Liverpool.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Up to the year 1906 tubercle bacilli were considered to occur in the faeces only in pulmonary or abdominal tuberculosis, due to ingestion of the infected sputum or to ulceration of the intestinal tract.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , April 1910 , pp. 37 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1910

References

REFERENCES

Bodo, (1892). In Kolle and Wassermann's Handbuch, Vol. II. p. 88.Google Scholar
Calmette, and Gúerin, (1909). Sur l'évacuation de bacilles tuberculeux par bile etc. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sc. Vol. CXLVIII. No. 10.Google Scholar
Emerson, (1906). Clinical Diagnosis, p. 390.Google Scholar
Griffith, F. (1909). Third Interim Report of the Royal Commission on Tuberculosis.Google Scholar
Herter, (1908). Infantilism, p. 41.Google Scholar
Jousset, (III. 1903). L'Inoscopie. Arch. Med. Expér. p. 289.Google Scholar
Lichtheim, (I. 1883). Fortschr. d. Med.Google Scholar
Mironescu, (1901). Ueber das Vorkommen von tuberkelaehnlichen Bakterien in menschlichen Fäces. Zeitschr. f. Hyg. Vol. XXXVII. p. 497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, (1905). Pathogenic Microorganisms, p. 312.Google Scholar
Rosenberger, (XII. 1907). Amer. Journ. Med. Sci.Google Scholar
Rosenberger, (1908). Labs. Jefferson Med. Coll. Hosp. No. 4.Google Scholar
Rosenberger, (II. 1909). Amer. Journ. Med. Sci.Google Scholar
Sahli, (1906). Diagnostic Methods, p. 440.Google Scholar
Schroeder, and Cotton, (1907). Bulls. Nos. 86 and 89 U. S. Bureau of Animal Industry of Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Shaw, (II. 1897). Journ. Amer. Med. Assoc. p. 554.Google Scholar
Wood, (1905). Chemical and Microscopical Diagnosis.Google Scholar