Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:59:32.537Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Age susceptibility and excretion of Salmonella typhimurium in calves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

R. A. Robinson  and
K. I. Loken
R. A. Robinson
Affiliation:
Ruakura Agricultural Research Centre, Private Bag, Hamilton, New Zealand
K. I. Loken
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Bacteriology and Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St Paul, Minn., U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Two groups of calves were dosed orally with 104, 105, and 106S. typhimurium at approximately 2 days of age and at 14–21 days of age. No obvious clinical signs were observed with this strain, but younger calves excreted the salmonellas in the faeces for longer periods than older animals. The younger animals also excreted more salmonellas per gram of faeces in the first week following dosing. These observations may explain why salmonella cross-infection is likely to occur where very young calves are congregated. Following cessation of excretion of salmonellas in the faeces and subsequent slaughter of calves, examination of all the mesenteric, caecal, and colic lymph nodes showed these to be the most useful sites for recovery of salmonellas.

Provided good nutrition and hygienic conditions prevail, calves retained on their farm of origin for longer periods are more likely to recover from neonatal salmonella infections.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 66 , Issue 2 , June 1968 , pp. 207 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

References

Adinarayanan, N., Smyser, C. F. & Roekel, H. Van (1966). Field and laboratory studies of avian salmonellosis. Symp. int. Ass. vet. Fd Hyg. p. 134.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. S., Galbraith, N. S. & Taylor, C. E. D. (1961). An outbreak of human infection due to Salmonella typhimurium phage type 20a associated with infection in calves. Lancet, i, 854.Google Scholar
Anon. (1964). An analysis of the results of post-mortem examinations of calves, Nov. 1959 to Oct. 1961. Vet. Rec. 76, 1139.Google Scholar
Bierer, B. W. (1960). Effect of age factor on mortality in Salmonella typhimurium infection in turkey poults. J. Am. vet. med. Ass. 137, 657.Google Scholar
De Jong, H. & Ekdahl, M. O. (1965). Salmonellosis in calves—the effect of dose rate and other factors on transmission. N.Z. vet. J. 13, 59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guinée, P. A. M., Kampelmacher, E. H., Van Keulen, A. & Hofstra, K. (1964). Salmonellae in healthy cows and calves in the Netherlands. Zentbl VetMed. 11, 728.Google Scholar
Kampelmacher, E. H., Guinée, P. A. M. & Jansen, L. M. (1964). Studies on the use of surface decontamination of salmonella-contaminated mesenteric lymph nodes by boiling water. Tijdschr. Diergeneesk 89, 504.Google Scholar
Kent, T. H., Formal, S. B. & Labrec, E. H. (1966). Salmonella gastroenteritis in Rhesus monkeys. Archs Path. 82, 272.Google Scholar
McCall, C. E., Martin, W. T. & Boring, J. R. (1966). Efficiency of cultures of rectal swabs and faecal specimens in detecting salmonella carriers; correlation with numbers of salmonellas excreted. J. Hyg., Camb. 64, 261.Google Scholar
Merselis, J. G., Kaye, D., Connolly, C. S. & Hook, E. W. (1964). Quantitative bacteriology of the typhoid carrier state. Am. J. trap. Med. Hyg. 13, 425.Google Scholar
Moore, B. (1948). The detection of paratyphoid carriers in towns by means of sewage examination. Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth 7, 241.Google Scholar
Mushin, R. & Dubos, R. (1965). Colonization of the mouse intestine with Escherichia coli. J. exp. Med. 122, 745.Google Scholar
Newell, K. W. (1967). Possibilities for investigation and control of salmonellosis for this decade. Am. J. publ. Hlth 57, 472.Google Scholar
Nottingham, P. M. (1967). Salmonella infections in calves and other animals. II. Comparison of media. N.Z. Jl agric. Res. 10, 210.Google Scholar
Robinson, R. A. (1966). Field and experimental epidemiology of salmonella infection in calves. Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 26, 134.Google Scholar
Sarhan, A. E. & Greenberg, B. G. (1956). Estimation of location and scale parameters by order statistics from singly and doubly censored samples. Ann. math. Statist. 27, 427.Google Scholar
Severens, J. M., Roberts, E. & Card, L. E. (1944). A study of the defence mechanism involved in the hereditary resistance to pullorum disease. J. infect. Dis. 75, 33.Google Scholar
Szanton, V. L. (1957). Epidemic salmonellosis—a 30 month study of 80 cases of Salmonella oranienburg infection. Pediatrics, Springfield 29, 794.Google Scholar
Walton, J. R. (1966). Infectious drug resistance in E. coli isolated from healthy farm animals. Lancet ii, 1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Smith H. (1955). Observations on experimental fowl typhoid. J. comp. Path. 65, 37.Google Scholar
Williams, Smith H. (1966). Infected meat. Lancet ii, 490.Google Scholar