Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-8cnds Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T22:55:07.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Absorption or Saturation test of Castellani: its applications in Sero-Diagnosis, and in the Recognition of Bacterial Species. A Critical Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Frank E. Taylor
Frank E. Taylor
Affiliation:
Lecturer on Bacteriology, University of London, King's College.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Absorption or Saturation Test published by Castellani in 1902 is now becoming more extensively used by serological and bacteriological workers in European and American laboratories. Its use is also essential for the accurate study of certain tropical infections, so that it behoves all tropical workers to be familiar with this test. It is therefore believed that an account of the method together with a general review of the literature of the subject may not be out of place in this Journal.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , October 1918 , pp. 415 - 438
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1918

References

REFERENCES

1.Albrecht, and Gohn, (1901). Ueber die Aetiologie und pathologische Anatomie der Meningitis cerebro-spinalis epidemica. Wien. klin. Wochenschr. xiv. 984.Google Scholar
2.Bainbridge, (1909). On the paratyphoid and food-poisoning bacilli, and on the nature and efficiency of certain rat viruses. Journ. of Path. and Bact. xiii. 443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Bainbridge, and O'Brien, (1911). On the Paratyphoid Group of Bacilli. Journ. of Hygiene, xi. 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Ballner, and Sagasser, (1904). Über spezifische Bindung von Agglutininen bei Absorptionsversuchen. Arch. f. Hyg. li. 266.Google Scholar
5.Bezanĉon, and Griffon, (1900). Étude de la Réaction Agglutinante du Serum dans les Infections expérimentales et humaines à Pneumocoque. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, xiv. 449.Google Scholar
6.Bordet, (1899). Mécanisme de l'agglutination. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 248 footnote.Google Scholar
7.Boycott, (1906). Observations on the bacteriology of paratyphoid fever, and on the reactions of typhoid and paratyphoid sera. Journ. of Hygiene, vi. 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Broughton-Alcock, (1917). Private Communication from the Author.Google Scholar
9.Castellani, (1902). Agglutination bei gemischter Infection und Diagnose der letzteren. Zeitschr. f. Hyg. u. Infektionskr. xl. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Chantemeśse, and Grimberg, (1916). Les fièvres typhoides intriquées. Presse Médicale, Nos. 34–35, 273.Google Scholar
11.Chickering, (1915). The Concentration of the Protective Bodies in Antipneumococcus Serum. Specific Precipitate Extracts. Journ. Exper. Med. xxii. 248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Cole, (1913). The Treatment of Pneumonia by Specific Serums. Journ. Amer. Med. Assoc. lxi. 663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Conradi, (1904). Über Mischinfektion durch Typhus- und Paratyphus-bazillen. Deutsche med. Wochenschr. p. 1165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Crendiropoulo, (1913). Recherches sur les vibrions au lazaret de Tor pendant le pèlerinage 1912–1913. Alexandria, 1913.Google Scholar
15.D'Amato, (1910). Untersuchungen nach der Methode der Absorption der Agglutinine. Centralbl. f. Bakt. liii. 337.Google Scholar
16.Darre, and Dumas, (1914). Nouvelle Espèce de Para-meningocoque. Pluralité des Parameningocoques. Compt. Rend. Soc. Biol. lxxvii. 106.Google Scholar
17.Dochez, and Avery, (1915). Varieties of Pneumococcus and their Relation to Lobar Pneumonia. Journ. Exper. Med. xxi. 14.Google Scholar
18.Dochez, and Gillespie, (1913). A Biological Classification of Pneumococci. Journ. Amer. Med. Assoc. xi. 727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Dopter, and Koch, (1908). Sur la Coagglutination du Meningocoque et du Gonocoque. Compt. Rend. Soc. Biol. p. 215.Google Scholar
20.Dopter, and Pauron, (1914). Différenciation des Parameningocoques entre eux par la Saturation des Agglutinines. Compt. Rend. Soc. Biol. lxxii. 231.Google Scholar
21.Dopter, and Pauron, (1914). La Saturation des Agglutinines et des Précipitines appliquée à la Différenciation du Meningocoques et des Parameningocoques. Compt. Rend. Soc. Biol. p. 157.Google Scholar
22.Dreyer, (1916). The Use of Standard Agglutinable Cultures in testing the Agglutinating Power of a Serum against Dysentery Bacilli. The Medical Research Committee's Directions.Google Scholar
23.Eisenberg, and Volk, (1902). Untersuchungen über die Agglutination. Zeitschr. f. Hyg. u. Infektionskr. xl. 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Elser, and Huntoon, (1909). Studies on Meningitis. Journ. of Med. Res. xx. 461.Google Scholar
25.Eyre, and Washbourn, (1899). Further Experiments with Paue's Antipneumococcus Serum. Brit. Med. Journ. ii. 1247.Google Scholar
26.Firth, (1911). The Paratyphoid Problem in India. Journ. Roy. Army Med. Corps, xvii. 136.Google Scholar
27.Fulle, (1914). Ricerche Morfologiche e Biologiche intorno al Bacilli asiaticus I, asiaticus II, Bact. columbense (Castellani). Sperimentale. lxviii. 721.Google Scholar
28.Gautier, and Weissenbach, (1916). Le Diagnostique Typhique et Paratyphique chez les vaccinés et les non-vaccinés par la Sero-réaction de Widal. Valeur de l'épreuve de la saturation des Agglutinines dans le cas d'agglutinations multiples. Bull. et Mém. de la Soc. Méd. des Hôpit. Nos. 11, 12, 450.Google Scholar
29.Gordon, (1915). Identification of the Meningococeus. Journ. Roy. Army Med. Corps, xxiv. 455.Google Scholar
30.Gordon, and Murray, (1915). Identification of the Meningococcus. Journ. Roy. Army Med. Corps, xxv. 411.Google Scholar
31.Gratton, and Harvey, (1911). A Small Epidemic of Typhoid Fever caused by an Acute Carrier. Journ. Roy. Army Med. Corps, xvii. 131.Google Scholar
32.Gratton, and Wood, (1911). Paratyphoid Fever in India. Journ. Roy. Army Med. Corps, 143.Google Scholar
33.Gratton, and Harvey, (1911). An Inquiry into a Small Epidemic of Paratyphoid Fever in a Camp in India. Journ. Roy. Army Med. Corps, xvi. 9.Google Scholar
34.Harvey, (1909). Report on Enteric Fever Convalescent Depôt at Naina Tal. Abstracts from Annual Reports of Divisional Sanitary Officers for India, p. 105.Google Scholar
35.Harvey, (1915). The Causation and Prevention of Enteric Fever in Military Service with special Reference to the Importance of the Carrier. Journ. Roy. Army Med. Corps, xxv. 94, 193.Google Scholar
36.Händel, (1908). Zur Differenzierung der Ruhrbakterien mittels die Agglutination, Komplementablenkung und den backteriotropen Immuniserumwirkung. Arb. a. d. Kaiserl. Gesundheitsamte, xxviii 358.Google Scholar
37.Hetsch, and Lentz, (1903). Beitrag zur Frage nach der Specificität des Serum des normalen und cholera-immunisierten Pferdes enthaltenen Agglutinine. Festschr. f. Robert Koch, p. 17.Google Scholar
38.Hutt, (1913). Neue Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Pseudo-Dysenterie, etc. Zeitschr. f. Hygiene, lxxiv. 108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39.Knox, and Shorer, (1906). The Relation of Types of Diarrhœa in Children to Strains of B. dysenteriae. Journ. of Exper. Med. viii. 377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40.Kruse, (1907). Neue Untersuchungen über die Ruhr. Deutsche med. Wochenschr. xxxiii. 292.Google Scholar
41.Lentz, (1913). “Dysenterie” in Kolle and Wassermann's Handbuch der pathogenen Mikro-organismen, 2nd Ed. iii. 932.Google Scholar
42.Levy, and Fornet, (1906). Nahrungsmittelvergiftung und Paratyphosus. Centralbl. f. Bakt. xli. 161.Google Scholar
43.Lieberknecht, (1908–9). Über Pseudo-meningokokkenausden Rachen gesunder Schulkinder. Arch. f. Hyg. lxviii. 143.Google Scholar
44.Lösener, (1909). Zur Aetiologie der in Ostpreussen heimischen Ruhr. Centralbl. f. Bakt. xlviii. Orig. Heft 3.Google Scholar
45.Lüdke, (1911). Die Bacillenruhr, Jena. Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar
46.Mathers, (1915). The Varieties of Pneumococci causing Lobar Pneumonia, with Special Reference to their Biologic Differences. Journ. of Infect. Dis. xv. 514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47.Mayer, (1910). Zur Epidemiologie und Bakteriologie der Pseudo-dysenterie. Klin. Jahrbuch, i. 157.Google Scholar
48.Morgan, (1911). The Differentiation of the Mannite-fermenting Group of B. dysenteriae, with Special Reference to Strains isolated from various sources in this Country. Journ. of Hygiene, xi. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49.Neufeld, and Händel, (1910). Weitere Untersuchungen über Pneumokokken Heilsera. III Mitteilung. Über Vorkommen und Bedeutung atypischen Varietäten des Pneumococcus. Arb. a. d. Kaiserl. Gesundheitsamte, xxxiv. 293.Google Scholar
50.Neufeld, and Händel, (1907). Beitrag zur Beurteilung der El Tor Vibrionen. Arb. a. d. Kaiserl. Gesundheitsamte, xxvi.Google Scholar
51.Park, and Collins, (1904). Specific and non-specific or group agglutinins. Journ. of Med. Res. xii 180.Google Scholar
52.Posselt, and Sagasser, (1903). Über Beeinflussung der Agglutinine durch spezifische Absorption. Wien. klin. Wochenschr. xvi. 691.Google Scholar
53.Ruffer, (1907). Researches on the Bacteriological Diagnosis of Cholera. Sanitary, Maritime and Quarantine Council, Alexandria; also Brit. Med. Journ. i. 735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54.Ruffer, and Willmore, (1909). On the Etiology of Dysentery. Brit. Med. Journ. ii. 862.Google Scholar
55.Sacquépée, (1916). Agglutination paradoxale au cours d'infections typhoides avec septicémie Eberthienne. Bull. et Mém. Soc. Méd. des Hôpit. Nos. 11, 12.Google Scholar
56.Taylor, (1918). Castellani's Absorption Test: its Technique and Applications. Journ. of Trop. Med. and Hyg. xxi. 37–38.Google Scholar
57.Tulloch, (1917). On the Differentiation by means of the Absorption of Agglutinin Test of the Types of Meningococci obtained from the Cerebro-spinal Fluid of Cases during the Current Outbreak of Cerebro-spinal Fever. Journ. Roy. Army Med. Corps, xxix.Google Scholar
58.Tulloch, (1917). On the Bacteriology of Wound Infections in Cases of Tetanus, and the Identification of B. tetani by Serological Reactions. Journ. Roy. Army Med. Corps, xxix.Google Scholar
59.Wassermann, (1912). Überdas Verhalten der verschiedenen Typen der Dysenteriebazillen in serologischer Hinsicht. Zeitschr. f. Hyg. u. Infektionskr. lxxi. 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
60.Winter, (1911). VergleichendeUntersuchungen über die chemischen und biologischen Eigenschaften von Ruhrbacillen. Zeitschr. f. Hyg. u. Infektionskr. lxx. 273.Google Scholar
61.Zammit, and Broughton-Alcock, (1917). Report on the Laboratory Investigations into Cases of Plague in Malta. M.S. Report abstracted in Trop. Dis. Bulletin, X. No. 5, p. 283.Google Scholar