Hostname: page-component-669899f699-7tmb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-29T18:35:45.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS & CASE STUDIES: Public Knowledge and Wastewater Management: A Case in San Francisco

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2011

Sheldon Gen
Sheldon Gen*
Affiliation:
Department of Public Administration, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California
*
Sheldon Gen, Department of Public Administration, San Francisco State University, 835 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94103; (phone) 415-817-4458; (fax) 415-817-4464; (e-mail) [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Contemporary wastewater management requires greater engagement of the public for reasons beneficial to both the public and wastewater managers. Such engagement, however, is contingent upon the public's requisite knowledge of the wastewater system, and significant factors work against the public's ability or willingness to understand the system. Using data from four focus groups, and representative data from a survey of 803 households in a major urban wastewater system, this study measures residents' level of knowledge about the wastewater system. While a majority of respondents could accurately identify the sources of wastewater that enter the sewers and actually are treated, few could identify any other important aspects of the system or any actual problems it is currently facing. Their lack of knowledge implies their potential participation in wastewater management issues is limited, which in turn limits the wastewater managers' abilities to leverage public support or meet public preferences for the wastewater system. These results emphasize the need for wastewater managers to communicate with their communities in ways meaningful to them in order to reap the benefits of public engagement.

Environmental Practice 12:328–341 (2010)

Type
Features
Information
Environmental Practice , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , December 2010 , pp. 328 - 341
Copyright
Copyright © National Association of Environmental Professionals 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ashforth, B.E., and Kreiner, G.E.. 1999. “How Can You Do It?” Dirty Work and the Challenge of Constructing a Positive Identity. Academy of Management Review 24(3):413–434.Google Scholar
Beecher, N., and Goldstein, N.. 2005. Public Perceptions of Biosolids Recycling. BioCycle 46(4):34–56.Google Scholar
Bruvold, W.H., and Ward, P.C.. 1972. Using Reclaimed Wastewater: Public Opinion. Journal (Water Pollution Control Federation) 44(9):1690–1696.Google ScholarPubMed
Daigger, G.T. 2007. Wastewater Management in the 21st Century. Journal of Environmental Engineering 133(7):671–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daily, S.J., McKinley, L., and High, T.. 1988. Educating the Public about Sanitation Rate Increases. Journal (Water Pollution Control Federation) 60(2):180–183.Google Scholar
DeLeon, R.E. 1992. Left Coast City: Progressive Politics in San Francisco, 1975–1991. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, 256 pages.Google Scholar
Gen, S., Shafer, H., and Nakagawa, M.. 2010. Perceptions of Environmental Justice: The Case of an U.S. Urban Wastewater System. Sustainable Development, DOI: 10.1002/sd.458. Available at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sd.458/abstract.Google Scholar
Guest, J.S., Skerlos, S.J., Barnard, J.L., Beck, M.B., Daigger, G.T., Hilger, H., Jackson, S.J., Karvazy, K., Kelly, L., MacPherson, L., Mihelcic, J.R., Pramanik, A., Raskin, L., Van Loosdrecht, M.C.M., Yeh, D., and Love, N.G.. 2009. A New Planning and Design Paradigm to Achieve Sustainable Resource Recovery from Wastewater. Environmental Science & Technology 43(16):6126–6130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanford, P.L., and Sokolow, A.D.. 1987. Mandates as Both Hardship and Benefit: The Clean Water Program in Small Communities. Publius 17(4):131–146.Google Scholar
Hopkins, G.J., and Hurlbert, D.. 1967. Organizing and Planning for Sewer Maintenance. Journal (Water Pollution Control Federation) 39(2):230–239.Google Scholar
Jonsson, A. 2005. Public Participation in Water Resources Management: Stakeholder Voices on Degree, Scale, Potential, and Methods in Future Water Management. Ambio 34(7):495–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krauss, G.D., and Page, A.L.. 1997. Wastewater, Sludge and Food Crops. BioCycle 38(2):74–80.Google Scholar
Ralston, S., and Ginley, J.. 2010. In Deep Water: Common Themes Keep Utility Managers Up at Night. American City and County, February 1, 40–43.Google Scholar
Roberts, N. 2008. Direct Citizen Participation: Challenges and Dilemmas. In The Age of Direct Citizen Participation, Roberts, N., ed. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY, 3–17.Google Scholar
Rogers, E.M., Matthews, S.J., Purdy, R.W., and Daly, J.C.. 1970. Communication Techniques in Water Pollution Control. Journal (Water Pollution Control Federation) 42(1):1–23.Google Scholar
Stenekes, N., Colebatch, H.K., Waite, T.D., and Ashbolt, N.J.. 2006. Risk and Governance in Water Recycling: Public Acceptance Revisited. Science, Technology, & Human Values 31(2):107–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarr, J.A., McCurley_III, J., McMichael, F.C., and Yosie, T.. 1984. Water and Wastes: A Retrospective Assessment of Wastewater Technology in the United States, 1800–1932. Technology and Culture 25(2):226–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tunstall, S. 2000. Public Perceptions of the Environmental Changes to the Thames Estuary in London, U.K. Journal of Coastal Research 16(2):269–277.Google Scholar
West, N. 1989. A Preliminary Review of Water Quality Parameters and Recreational User Perceptions of Nearshore Water Quality. Journal of Coastal Research 5(3):563–572.Google Scholar
Wolfson, M.M. 1983. Rural Wastewater Planning. Journal (Water Pollution Control Federation) 55(8):1042–1050.Google Scholar