Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:41:20.929Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wilderness and The Biosphere

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1983

References

* Pearsall, S.H., III, ‘In Absentia Benefits of Nature Reserves: A Review’, to be published in our Spring 1984 issue.

See our account of the 3rd World Wilderness Congress, published on pp. 366–7 of this issue.

†† See Professor Craig B. Davis's account of ‘The World Council for The Biosphere/International Society for Environmental Education’, published on pp. 353–4 of this issue.

** See Drs Hugh Saddler & Andrew K. Dragun's comment ‘Australian High-court Decision Ensures Preservation of the South-West Tasmania Wilderness’, published on pp. 355–6 of this issue, and accounts or comments by Dr Dragun, Kedar N. Baidya, and Roger de Candolle, in earlier issues of Environmental Conservation.

††† See DrOza, G.M.'s ‘Save Silent Valley as a World Heritage Site?’, published in Environmental Conservation, 8(1), p. 52, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar As we go to press we have received, from Dr Oza, clippings from the Indian Express of 7 and 8 11 1983Google Scholar with such headings as ‘Silent Valley Project Scrapped’ and ‘Decision on Silent Valley hailed’, while his accompanying letter conveying the good news of a favourable-to-conservationists decision by the Kerala State legislature wisely ends ‘Now the emphasis has to be once again to achieve the status of the World Heritage Site to make it safer for future generations.’